Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:26:31.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the septimic character of 2 and 3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Helen Popova Alderson
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, Cambridge

Extract

Let e be an integer greater than 1 and let pbe a prime such that p ≡ 1 (mod e). Criteria for 2 to be a residue of degree e modulo p have been obtained in various forms for e = 2, 3, 4 and 5. Thus, Euler and Lagrange proved that 2 is a quadratic residue mod p if and only if p ≡ ± 1 (mod 8). Gauss showed that 2 is a cubic residue mod p if and only if p is representable as p = l2 + 27m2 with integers l and m, and that 2 is a quartic residue mod p if and only if p is representable as p = 12 + 64m2. Lehmer (5) and Alderson (1) have found similar but more complicated conditions for 2 to be a quintic residue mod p. There are analogous results about 3. For example, it follows from quadratic reciprocity that 3 is a quadratic residue mod p if and only if p ≡ ± 1 (mod 12), and Jacobi(4) showed that 3 is a cubic residue mod p if and only if 4p is representable as l2 + 35m2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Alderson, H.On the quintic character of 2. Mathematika 11 (1964), 125130.Google Scholar
(2)Dickson, L. E.Cyclotomy, higher congruences and Waring's problem. Amer. J. Math. 57 (1935), 391424.Google Scholar
(3)Dickson, L. E.Cyclotomy and trinomial congruences. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (1935), 363380.Google Scholar
(4)Jacobi, C. G. J.De residuis cubicis commentatio numerosa. J. reine angew. Math. 2 (1827), 6669.Google Scholar
(5)Lehmer, E.The quintic character of 2 and 3. Duke Math. J. 18 (1951), 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar