Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T09:48:49.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reductions of ideals in local rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. G. Northcott
Affiliation:
The UniversitySheffield
D. Rees
Affiliation:
Downing CollegeCambridge

Extract

This paper contains some contributions to the analytic theory of ideals. The central concept is that of a reduction which is defined as follows: if and are ideals and , then is called a reduction of if n = n+1 for all large values of n. The usefulness of the concept depends mainly on two facts. First, it defines a relationship between two ideals which is preserved under homomorphisms and ring extensions; secondly, what we may term the reduction process gets rid of superfluous elements of an ideal without disturbing the algebraic multiplicities associated with it. For example, the process when applied to a primary ideal belonging to the maximal ideal of a local ring gives rise to a system of parameters having the same multiplicity; but the methods work almost equally well for an arbitrary ideal and bring to light some interesting facts which are rather obscured in the special case. The concept seems to be suitable for a variety of applications. The present paper contains one instance which is a generalized form of the associative law for multiplicities (see § 8), and the authors hope to give other illustrations in a separate paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Chevalley, C.Intersections of algebraic and algebraic varieties. Trans. Amer. math. Soc. 57 (1945), 185.Google Scholar
(2)Prüfer, H.Untersuchungen über die Teilbarkeitseigenshaften in Körpern. J. reine angew. Math. 168 (1932), 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Samuel, P. La notion de multiplicité en algèbre et en géometrie. Thesis (Paris), 1951.Google Scholar