Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:16:57.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PATTERNS OF DIVERSITY IN THE CANADIAN INSECT FAUNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H.V. Danks
H.V. Danks*
Affiliation:
Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 6P4
Get access

Abstract

The diversity of the Canadian insect fauna decreases and its composition (at all taxonomic levels) changes as climates become progressively more harsh toward the north. This climatic trend dominates patterns of diversity, but many other factors interact to produce the observed patterns. In the arctic, species richness is greatest in the west. Farther south, overall species richness is greatest in the west (especially British Columbia), associated with coastal and cordilleran habitats, and to a somewhat smaller degree in the southeast (especially Ontario), associated with deciduous forests and particularly with transitional forests which occupy a large area of southeastern Canada. However, certain taxa are better represented in the west or in the east, depending on present-day habitats and on historical factors. These conclusions, based chiefly on a sample of taxa of different types, are possible only because basic systematic work has been carried out to distinguish and map the species. Preliminary data on numerical patterns, such as the numbers of species relative to different potential resources such as host plants in different zones, tend to suggest that the occurrence of species in the north may depend so heavily on climatic factors that potential resources are not fully exploited and the effects of interspecific interactions on diversity are reduced.

Résumé

La diversité de la faune entomologique canadienne diminue et sa composition (à tous les rangs taxinomiques) se modifie en fonction des conditions climatiques qui deviennent progressivement plus rigoureuses vers le nord. Cette tendance du climat détermine les patterns de diversité, mais plusieurs autres facteurs y contribuent également. Dans l'arctique, la richesse en espèces est plus considérable vers l'ouest. Plus au sud, la richesse globale en espèces est plus grande dans l'ouest (surtout en Colombie-Britannique) où elle est associée aux habitats de la côte et à ceux de la cordillère, et, à un degré moindre, dans le sud-est (particulièrement en Ontario) où elle est associée aux forêts décidues, notamment aux forêts mixtes qui recouvrent une grande surface du sud-est canadien. Cependant, certains taxons sont mieux représentés dans l'ouest ou dans l'est, à cause des habitats qu'ils y trouvent et à la suite de l'action de facteurs historiques. De telles conclusions, basées en grande partie sur un échantillon de taxons divers, ne peuvent être avancées que grâce aux études systématiques qui ont permis de distinguer et de cartographier les espèces. Des données numériques préliminaires, telles le nombre d'espèces présentes relativement aux différentes ressources potentielles, par exemple les plantes hôtes dans des zones différentes, semblent indiquer que la présence d'espèces dans le nord peut être reliée de façon tellement étroite aux facteurs climatiques que les ressources potentielles ne sont pas totalement exploitées et les effets des interactions interspécifiques sur la diversité sont alors réduits. [Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 125 , Supplement S165 , 1993 , pp. 51 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, T.A., and Bliss, L.C.. 1974. Susceptibility to environmental impact in the Queen Elizabeth Islands. Arctic 27: 234–237 and map.Google Scholar
Beschel, R.E. 1969. [Floristic relations of the nearctic islands.] Bot. Zh. SSSR 54: 872–891. [In Russian, English summary.]Google Scholar
Borror, D.J., Delong, D.M., and Triplehorn, C.A.. 1981. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. 5th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, Toronto, etc.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y. (Ed.). 1991. Checklist of Beetles of Canada and Alaska. Agric. Can. Publ. 1861/E: 430 pp.Google Scholar
Bradley, G.A. 1974. Parasites of Forest Lepidoptera in Canada. Part 1. Can. For. Serv. Publ. 1336: 99 pp.Google Scholar
Bradley, J.C. 1956. The distribution of northeastern insects. Ent. News 67: 257–261.Google Scholar
Bright, D.E. 1976. The Bark Beetles of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera: Scolyidae). The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, Part 2. Can. Dep. Agric. Publ. 1576: 241 pp.Google Scholar
Bright, D.E. 1981. Taxonomic Monograph of the Genus Pityophthorus Eichoff in North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 118: 378 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1976. A revision of the genus Sepedophilus Gistel (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of America north of Mexico. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 99: 89 pp.Google Scholar
Chernov, Yu.I., Striganova, B.R., and Ananjeva, S.I.. 1977. Soil fauna of the polar desert at Cape Cheluskin, Taimyr Peninsula, USSR. Oikos 29: 175–179.Google Scholar
Clarke, A.H. Jr., 1973. The freshwater molluscs of the Canadian interior basin. Malacologia 13: 1–509.Google Scholar
Corbet, P.S. 1966. The role of rhythms in insect behaviour. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 3: 13–28.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1979 a. Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1979 b. Terrestrial habitats and distributions of Canadian insects, pp. 195–210 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1979 c. Summary of the diversity of Canadian terrestrial arthropods, pp. 240–244 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1980. Arthropods of Polar Bear Pass, Bathurst Island, Arctic Canada. Syllogeus 25: 68 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1981. Arctic Arthropods: A Review of Systematics and Ecology with Particular Reference to the North American fauna. Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.608 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1987. Insect–plant interactions in arctic regions. Revue Ent. Québ. 31: 52–75 [1986].Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. 1990. Arctic insects: instructive diversity, pp. 444–470 in Harington, C.R. (Ed.), Science and History in the Canadian Arctic Islands: Canada's Missing Dimension. Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ont. 2 vols, 855 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V, and Foottit, R.G.. 1989. Insects of the boreal zone of Canada. Can. Ent. 120: 625–690.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., and Rosenberg, D.M.. 1987. Aquatic insects of peatlands and marshes in Canada: Synthesis of information and identification of needs for research, pp. 163–174 in Rosenberg, D.M., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Aquatic Insects of Peatlands and Marshes in Canada. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 140: 174 pp.Google Scholar
Downes, J.A. 1964. Arctic insects and their environment. Can. Ent. 96: 280–307.Google Scholar
Downes, J.A. 1965. Adaptations of insects in the arctic. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 257–274.Google Scholar
Edlund, S.A., and Alt, B.T.. 1989. Regional congruence of vegetation and summer climatic patterns in the Queen Elizabeth Islands, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic 42: 3–23.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., and Ineichen, H.. 1988. The diurnal eclosion activity of Chironomus nuditarsis (Dipterd)in the course of the seasons. Zool. Jb., Abt. Syst. Okoi. Geogr. Tiere 115: 93–115.Google Scholar
Goulet, H. 1986. The Genera and Species of the Nearctic Dolerini (Symphyta: Tenthredinidae: Selandriinae): Classification and Phylogeny. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 135: 208 pp.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K.G.A. 1982. The Spittlebugs of Canada (Homoptera: Cercopidae). The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, Part 10. Agric. Can. Publ. 1740: 102 pp.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K.G.A. 1983. Introduced and native leafhoppers common to the Old and New Worlds (Rhynchota: Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Can. Ent. 115: 473–511.Google Scholar
Harvey, G.T. 1985. The taxonomy of the coniferophagous Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): A review. pp. 16–48 in Sanders, C.J., Stark, R. W., Mullins, E.J., and Murphy, J. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Spruce Budworm Research. Proc. CANUSA Spruce Budworms Res. Symp., Bangor, Maine. 1984. Can. For. Serv., Ottawa, Ont.527 pp.Google Scholar
Hopla, C.E. 1964–1965. The feeding habits of Alaskan mosquitoes. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 59/60: 88–127.Google Scholar
Hustich, I. 1960. Plant geographical regions, pp. 54–62 in Sømme, A. (Ed.), The Geography of Norden. Heinemann, London/Cappelens, Oslo. 363 pp.Google Scholar
Janzen, D.H. 1981. The peak in North American ichneumonid species richness lies between 38° and 42° N. Ecology 62: 532–537.Google Scholar
Kelton, L.A. 1978. The Anthocoridae of Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, Part 4. Agric. Can. Publ. 1639: 101 pp.Google Scholar
Kloet, G.S., and Hincks, W.D.. 1978 et seq. A Checklist of British Insects. 2nd ed. Royal Entomological Society of London, London, England.Google Scholar
Knutson, L., Sailer, R.I., Murphy, W.L., Carlson, R.W., and Dogger, J.R.. 1990. Computerized data base on immigrant arthropods. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 83: 1–8.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, J.D., and Wood, D.M.. 1988. A zoogeographic analysis of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera) of Beringia, and some inferences about past Beringian habitats, pp. 109–123 in Downes, J.A., and Kavanaugh, D.H. (Eds.), Origins of the North American Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 144: 168 pp.Google Scholar
Larson, D.J., and Colbo, M.H.. 1983. The aquatic insects: Biogeographic considerations, pp. 593–677 in South, G.R. (Ed.), Biogeography and Ecology of the Island of Newfoundland. Junk, The Hague. 723 pp.Google Scholar
Larson, D.J., and Langor, D. W.. 1982. The carabid beetles of insular Newfoundland (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindellidae) — 30 years after Lindroth. Can. Ent. 114: 591–597.Google Scholar
Lewis, T., and Taylor, L.R.. 1964. Diurnal periodicity of flight by insects. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 116: 343–476.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1957. The Faunal Connections between Europe and North America. Wiley, New York, NY. 344 pp.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1961–1969. The ground-beetles of Canada and Alaska, parts 2–6; 1. Opusc. Ent. Suppl. 20(1961), 23(1963), 29(1966), 33(1968), 34(1969), 35(1969). 1192 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, V.G., Kevan, D.K. McE., Matthews, J.V. Jr.,, and Tomlin, A.D.. 1982. Status and research needs of Canadian soil arthropods: A brief. Bull. ent. Soc. Can. 14(1): Suppl. 5 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, J.V. Jr., 1979. Tertiary and quaternary environments: Historical background for an analysis of the Canadian insect fauna, pp. 31–86 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
May, R.M. 1978. The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas. pp. 188–204 in Mound, L.A., and Waloff, N. (Eds.), Diversity of Insect Faunas. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 9: 204 pp.Google Scholar
May, R.M. 1988. How many species are there on earth? Science 241: 1441–1449.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. et al. , 1979. Diptera. pp. 389–424 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
McGuffin, W.C. 1972. Guide to the Geometridae of Canada. II. Subfamily Ennominae. 1. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 86: 159 pp.Google Scholar
McGuffin, W.C. 1977. Guide to the Geometridae of Canada (Lepidoptera). II. Subfamily Ennominae. 2. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 101: 191 pp.Google Scholar
McGuffin, W.C. 1981. Guide to the Geometridae of Canada (Lepidoptera). II. Subfamily Ennominae. 3. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 117: 153 pp.Google Scholar
McGuffin, W.C. 1987. Guide to the Geometridae of Canada (Lepidoptera). II. Subfamily Ennominae. 4. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 138: 182 pp.Google Scholar
Mound, L.A., and Waloff, N. (Eds.). Diversity of Insect Faunas. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 9: 204 pp.Google Scholar
Munroe, E.G. 1956. Canada as an environment for insect life. Can. Ent. 88: 372–476.Google Scholar
Munroe, E.G. 1963. Characteristics and history of the North American fauna: Lepidoptera. Proc. XVIth int. Congr. Zool. (Washington 1963) 4: 21–27.Google Scholar
Munroe, E.G. 1979. Lepidoptera. pp. 427–481 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Rowe, J.S. 1972. Forest Regions of Canada. Can. For. Serv. Publ. 1300: 172 pp.Google Scholar
Schwert, D.P., and Ashworth, A.C.. 1988. Late Quaternary history of the northern beetle fauna of North America: A synthesis of fossil and distributional evidence, pp. 93–107 in Downes, J.A., and Kavanaugh, D.H. (Eds.), Origins of the North American Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 144: 168 pp.Google Scholar
Scoggan, H.J. 1978. The flora of Canada. Publs natn. Mus. Nat. Sci. (Bot.) 7, Vols. 1–4: 1711 pp.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E. 1979 a. Present patterns in the fauna and flora of Canada, pp. 87–179 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E. 1979 b. Hemiptera. pp. 329–348 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Shields, O. 1989. World numbers of butterflies. J. Lepid. Soc. 43: 178–183.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1971 a. Revision of the Tribe Quediini of America North of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 79: 303 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1971 b. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Supplementum 1. Can. Ent. 103: 1833–1848.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1973. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Supplementum 2. Can. Ent. 105: 1421–1434.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1976. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Supplementum 3. Can. Ent. 108: 169–184.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1978. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Supplementum 4. Can. Ent. 110: 815–840.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1981. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Supplementum 5. Can. Ent. 113: 613–644.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1988. Review of the Family Hydrophilidae of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 142: 316 pp.Google Scholar
Spence, J.R., and Spence, D.H.. 1988. Of ground beetles and men: Introduced species and the synanthropic fauna of western Canada, pp. 151–168 in Downes, J.A., and Kavanaugh, D.H. (Eds.), Origins of the North American Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 144: 168 pp.Google Scholar
Strong, D.R. Jr.,, Simberloff, D., Abele, L.G., and Thistle, A.B. (Eds.). 1984. Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1969. The genera of Ichneumonidae. Mem. Am. Ent. Inst. 1(11).Google Scholar
Turnbull, A.L. 1979. Recent changes to the insect fauna of Canada, pp. 180–194 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M., and Corbet, P.S.. 1975. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Vol. III. Part III: The Anisoptera — Three Families. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo. 307 pp.Google Scholar