Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T17:51:41.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW OF THE FAMILY HYDROPHILIDAE OF CANADA AND ALASKA (COLEOPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Aleš Smetana
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 120 , Supplement S142 , 1988 , pp. 3 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angus, R.B. 1970 a. A revision of the beetles of the genus Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) subgenera Orphelophorus d'Orchymont, Gephelophorus Sharp and Meghelophorus Kuwert. Acta zool. fenn. 129. 62 pp.Google Scholar
Angus, R.B. 1970 b. Revisional studies on east Palaearctic and some Nearctic species of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei (No. 226). Acta zool. hung. 16: 249–290.Google Scholar
Angus, R.B. 1970 c. Helophorus orientalis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), a parthenogenetic water beetle from Siberia and North America, and a British Pleistocene fossil. Can. Ent. 102: 129–143.Google Scholar
Angus, R.B. 1973. The habitats, life histories and immature stages of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 125: 1–26, 4 pl.Google Scholar
Balfour-Browne, J. 1958. La réserve naturelle intégrale du Mont Nimba. VI. Coléoptères Hydrophiloides. Mem. Inst. fr. Afr. noire: 169–190.Google Scholar
Bedel, L.E.M. 1881. Faune des Coléoptères du bassin de la Seine (et de ses bassins secondaires). Vol. I. Appendix to Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 24 + 360 pp.Google Scholar
Bedel, L.E.M. 1891. Synopsis des grands Hydrophiles (Genre Stethoxus Solier). Rev. Ent. 10: 306–323.Google Scholar
Berge Henegouwen van, A. 1986. Revision of the European species of Anacaena Thomson (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ent. Scand. 17: 393–407.Google Scholar
Berthold, A.A. 1827. Latreille's natürliche Familien des Thierreiches. (German translation von Latreille: Families naturelles.… 1825). Weimar. 8 + 602 pp.Google Scholar
Bertrand, H.P.I. 1972. Larves et nymphes des coléoptères aquatiques du globe…. Paris. 804 pp.Google Scholar
Bertrand, H.P.I. 1977. Larves et nymphes des coléoptères aquatiques du globe. Errata et addenda. Abbeville, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An illustrated descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera or beetles (exclusive of Rhynchophora) known to occur in Indiana. Indianapolis. 1386 pp.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1923. Notes on the Coleoptera from southern Florida with descriptions of new species. Can. Ent. 55: 13–20.Google Scholar
Böving, A.G., and Craighead, F.C.. 1931. An illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entomologica am. N.S. 11: 1–351, 125 pl.Google Scholar
Böving, A.G., and Henriksen, K.L.. 1939. The developmental stages of the Danish Hydrophilidae (Ins., Coleoptera). Vidensk. Meddr. dansk nat. Foren. 102: 27–162.Google Scholar
Brown, W.J. 1929. Some new species of Coleoptera. Can. Ent. 61: 108–110.Google Scholar
Brown, W.J. 1931. New species of Coleoptera (II). Can. Ent. 63: 115–122.Google Scholar
Brown, W.J. 1937. The Coleoptera of Canada's eastern arctic. Can. Ent. 69: 106–111.Google Scholar
Brown, W.J. 1940 a. Notes on the American distribution of some species of Coleoptera common to the European and North American continents. Can. Ent. 72: 65–78.Google Scholar
Brown, W.J. 1940 b. Some new and poorly known species of Coleoptera. Can. Ent. 72: 182–187.Google Scholar
Casey, T. 1884. Contributions to the descriptive and systematic coleopterology of North America. Part I. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc: 1–60.Google Scholar
Cheary, B.S. 1971. The biology, ecology and systematics of the genus Laccobius (Laccobius) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) of the New World. Riverside. 178 pp.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1927. Helophorus aquaticus L. in America. Psyche 34: 174–175.Google Scholar
Erichson, W.F. 1837–1839. Die Käfer der Mark Brandenburg I. Berlin. 740 pp.Google Scholar
Eschscholtz, J.F. 1822. Entomographien. Erste Lieferung. Berlin. 128 + 3 pp., 2 col. pl.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae…………………‥Flensburgi et Lipsiae. 30 + 832 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1781. Species Insectorum … Vol. I and II. Hamburgi et Kilii. Vol. I, 8 + 552 pp.; Vol. II, 517 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1792. Entomologia Systematica. I, 2. Hafniae. 538 pp.Google Scholar
Fall, H.C. 1901. List of the Coleoptera of Southern California, with notes on habits and distribution and descriptions of new species. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 8: 1–282.Google Scholar
Fall, H.C. 1924 a. New species of North American Hydrobiini. JIN.Y. ent. Soc. 32: 85–99.Google Scholar
Fall, H.C. 1924 b. Some notes on Cercyon, with descriptions of three new species. Psyche 31: 247–253.Google Scholar
Forster, J.R. 1771. Novae species Insectorum, Centuria I. London. 8 + 100 pp.Google Scholar
Ganglbauer, L. 1904. Die Käfer von Mitteleuropa IV.1. Wien. 286 pp.Google Scholar
Gemminger, M., and Harold, E.. 1868. Catalogus Coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Tom II. Monachii. pp. 425–978.Google Scholar
Gentili, E. 1985. I Laccobius americani – I. I Laccobius del Canada (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mus. A. Stoppani Sem. Arcivesc. Milano, 6° Annuario (N.S.) 1983: 31–45.Google Scholar
Germar, E.F. 1824. Insectorum species novae aut minus cognitae descriptionibus illustratae. Coleoptera. Halae. 24 + 624 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Green, J.W. 1946. A new species of Enochrus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 72: 61–631 pl.Google Scholar
Gundersen, R.W. 1977. New species and taxonomic changes in the genus Enochrus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 31: 251–272.Google Scholar
Gundersen, R.W. 1978. Nearctic Enochrus. Biology, keys, descriptions and distribution (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). St. Cloud, Minnesota. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1808. Insecta Suecica descripta. Clasis I. Coleoptera sive Eleutherata. Vol. I, pars 1. Scaris572 pp.Google Scholar
Hardy, A.R., Cheary, B.S., and Malcolm, S.E.. 1981. A clarification of the authorship of some names in Laccobius Erichson (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 57: 303–305.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1946. Notes on European Coleoptera in Washington, including a new species of Megasternum. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 22: 77–80.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1965. The beetles of the Pacific Northwest, Part IV. Univ. Wash. Publs Biol. 16. IX + 268 pp.Google Scholar
Hellman, J.L. 1975. A taxonomic revision of the genus Hydrochus of North America, Central America and West Indies. Univ. of Maryland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Herbst, J.F.W. 1797. Natursystem aller bekannten in- und ausländischen Insecten … Vol. 7. Berlin. 346 pp pl. 96–116.Google Scholar
Hilsenhoff, W.L., and Tracy, B.H.. 1982. A new species of Hydrochara (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) from the western Great Lakes region. Great Lakes Ent. 15: 99–102.Google Scholar
Hope, F.W. 1838. The Coleopterists Manual…Vol. 2. Predaceous land and water beetles. London. 168 pp 24 col. pl.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1873. Revision of the genera and species of the tribe Hydrobiini. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 13: 118–137.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1876. Synoptic tables of some genera of Coleoptera, with notes and synonymy. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 5: 246–252.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1890 a. Notes on some Hydrobiini of Boreal America. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 17: 237–278.Google Scholar
Horn, G.H. 1890 b. A revision of Sphaeridiini inhabiting Boreal America. Trans Am. ent. Soc. 17: 279–314.Google Scholar
Hosseinie, S.O. 1976 a. Comparative life histories of three species of Tropisternus in the laboratory (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 61: 261–268.Google Scholar
Hosseinie, S.O. 1976 b. Comparative studies on developmental stages of three species of Tropisternus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 61: 847–857.Google Scholar
Illiger, J.C.W. 1798. Verzeichnis der Käfer Preussens. Halle. 42 + 510 pp.Google Scholar
Illiger, J.C.W. 1801. Magazin für Insectenkunde. Vol. 1, Heft 1–2. Braunschweig. 8 + 260 pp.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R. 1955. L'édéage. Initiation aux recherches sur la systématique des Coléoptères. Publs Mus. natn. Hist. nat. 16. 155 pp.Google Scholar
Kellen, W.R. 1953. A quantitative sampler for aquatic insects. J. econ. Ent.: 913–914.Google Scholar
Knisch, A. 1922. Hydrophiliden-Studien (Op. 10). Arch. Naturgesch. 88. A (5): 87–126.Google Scholar
Knisch, A. 1924. Zwei neue nearktische Palpicornier (Col. Hydrophilidae Op. 13). Ent. Anz. 4: 55–56.Google Scholar
Laporte, F.L. (Castelnau). 1840. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux Articulés. Vol. 2. Nécrophages – Trimères Paris. 564 pp., pl. 1–38.Google Scholar
LaRivers, I. 1949. Entomic nematode literature from 1926 to 1946 exclusive of medical and veterinary titles. Wasmann Club Collect. 7: 177–206.Google Scholar
Leach, W.E. 1815. Entomology. In Brewster, Edinburgh Encyclopaedic Vol. 9. Edinburgh, pp. 57–172.Google Scholar
Leach, W.E. 1817. The Zoological Miscellany. Vol. II. London. 151 pp., pl. 121–150.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1850. General remarks upon the Coleoptera of Lake Superior. In Agassiz, Lake Superior. Vol. IV. Boston, p. 201–242.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1851–1852. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera, from California. Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York 5: 125–216.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1855. Synopsis of the Hydrophilidae of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 7: 356–375.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1859. The Coleoptera of Kansas and eastern New Mexico. Smithson. Contr. Knowl. 11. 6 + 58 pp 2 pl.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1861 a. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Washington. 25 + 286 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1861 b. New species of Coleoptera inhabiting the Pacific district of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 13: 338–359.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1863. New species of North American Coleoptera. Part I. Smithson. Misc. Colins 167. 177 pp.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1948 a. Some nearctic species of palpicorn water beetles, new and old (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Wasmann Club Collect. 7: 33–46.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1948 b. Contributions toward a knowledge of the insect fauna of Lower California. No. 11. Coleoptera: Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae, Hydrophilidae, Limnebiidae. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (4) 24: 375–4483, 2 pl.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1950. New species and subspecies of nearctic water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae). Wasmann Club Collect. 7 (1949): 243–256.Google Scholar
Leech, H.B. 1956. (Aquatic Coleoptera, part), pp. 293–371in Usinger, R.L. (Ed.), Aquatic Insects of California. Berkeley. 508 pp.Google Scholar
Leng, C.W., and Mutchler, A.J.. 1918. Insects of Florida. V. The water beetles. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 38: 73–116.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae…. ed. X, Vol. I. Holmiae. 2 + 824 pp.Google Scholar
Linné, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica. Ed. 2. Stockholmiae. 578 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Malcolm, S.E. 1971. The water beetles of Maine: including the Families Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Noteridae, and Hydrophilidae. Univ. Maine. Tech. Bull. 48. 49 pp.Google Scholar
Malcolm, S.E. 1979. Two new species of Laccobius from eastern North America (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Jl. N.Y. ent. Soc. 87: 59–65.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1843. Beitrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Aleutischen Inseln, der Insel Sitkha und Neu-Californiens. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 16, 2: 175–314.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1852. Zeiter Nachtrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Nord-Amerikanischen Laender des Russischen Reiches. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 25, 2: 283–387.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1853. Dritter Nachtrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Nord-Amerikanischen Laender des Russischen Reiches. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 26, 3: 95–273.Google Scholar
Marsham, T. 1802. Entomologia Britannica. I. Coleoptera. London. 31 + 548 pp.Google Scholar
Matta, J.F. 1974. The Insects of Virginia: No. 8. The aquatic Hydrophilidae of Virginia (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Res. Div. Bull. 94. Virg. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg. 44 pp.Google Scholar
Matta, J.F. 1982. The bionomics of two species of Hydrochara (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) with descriptions of their larvae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 84: 461–467.Google Scholar
McCorkle, D.V. 1965. (Subfamily Elophorinae). pp. 23–38. in Hatch, M.H. (Ed.), The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part IV. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 16. 268 pp.Google Scholar
Melsheimer, F.. 1846. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 2 (1844–1845): 26–53, 98–118.Google Scholar
Merritt, R.W., and Cummins, K.W. (Eds.). 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd ed.Dubuque. 722 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1963. Paracymus tarsalis, a new species from the northwestern United States (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 17: 91–93.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1964. Notes on Enochrus and Cymbiodyta from the Pacific Northwest (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 18: 69–78.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1965 a. Notes on northwestern Berosus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) with two new species. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 73: 28–33.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1965 b. Three new species of Crenitis from the Pacific Northwest (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 19: 33–36.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1965 c. (Family Hydrophilidae exclusive Helophorinae and Sphaeridiinae). In Hatch, M.H. (Ed.), The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part IV. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 16. 268 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1965 d. New Laccobius (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) from the Pacific Northwest with notes on previously named species. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 73: 56–62.Google Scholar
Miller, D.C. 1974. Revision of the New World Chaetarthria (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Entomologica Am. 49: 1–123.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. 1845. Observations sur le musée entomologique de l'université impériale de Moscou. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 18, 3: 332–388, pl. V–VII.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. 1853. Hydrocanthares de la Russie, catalogisés par M. Helsingfors. Helsingfors. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. 1859. Coléoptères nouveaux de Californie. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 32, 2: 122–185.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. 1860. Coléoptères de la Sibérie orientale et particulier des rives de l'Amour (rapportés par Schrenck, Maack, Ditmar, Voznessenski). In Schrenck, Reisen und Forschungen im Amurlande. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg. pp. 79–257, 6 col. pl., 1 map.Google Scholar
Moulins, M. 1960. Contribution à la connaissance de quelques types larvaires d'Hydrophilidae. Trav. Lab. zool. Dijon 30: 1–416 + 7; 42 pl.Google Scholar
Müller, O.F. 1764. Fauna Insectoram Fridrichsdalina…. Hafniae et Lipsiae. 24 + 96 pp.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E. 1844. Histoire naturelle de Coléoptères de France. Palpicoraes. Paris. 7 + 196 pp., 1 pl.Google Scholar
Notman, H. 1919. Coleoptera collected at Mooers, Clinton Co. N.Y. September 9–13, with descriptions of new species. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 14: 129–141.Google Scholar
Notman, H. 1920. Coleoptera collected at Windsor, Broome Co., N.Y., 26 May to 5 June, 1918, with notes and descriptions. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 28: 178–194.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1919. Contribution à l'étude des sous-familles des Sphaeridiinae et les Hydrophilinae (Col., Hydrophilidae). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 88: 105–168.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1926. Contribution à l'étude des Hydrophilides. V. Bull. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 66: 91–106.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1927. Über zwei neue diluviale Helophoren-Arten. Jber. Abh. Naturw. Ges. Isis, Dresden 1926: 100–104.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1938. Contribution à l'étude des Palpicomia. XII. Bull. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 78: 426–438.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1942 a. Révision des Laccobius américains (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrobiini). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 18: 1–18.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1942 b. Contribution à l'étude de la tribu Hydrobiinae Bedel, specialement de sa sous-tribu Hydrobiae (Palpicomia, Hydrophilidae). Mem. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 24: 1–68.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1945. Notes sur des Helophorus, spécialement américains (Coleoptera Palpicomia Hydrophilidae). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 21: 1–28.Google Scholar
d'Orchymont, A. 1946. Notes on some American Berosus (s. str.) (Coleoptera, Palpicomia, Hydrophilidae). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 22: 1–20.Google Scholar
Palisot de Beauvois, A.M.F.J. 1805–1821. Insectes recueillis en Afrique et en Amérique…. Paris. 276 pp., 90 col. pl.Google Scholar
Paykull, G. 1798. Fauna Suecica, Insecta. Vol. I. Upsaliae, 8 + 358 + 2 pp.Google Scholar
Pennak, R.W. 1978. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States. 2nd ed.John Wiley & Sons, 803 pp.Google Scholar
Perkins, P.D., and Spangler, P.J.. 1981. A description of the larvae of Helocombus bifidus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 57: 52–56.Google Scholar
Poppius, B. 1907. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Coleopteren-Fauna des Lena-Thales in Ost-Sibirien. I.I. Gyrinidae, Hydrophilidae, etc. Ofvers, finska VetenskSoc. Forh. 49: 1–17.Google Scholar
Preyssler, J.D.E. 1790. Verzeichniss bohmischer Insecten. Erstes Hundert. Prag. 108 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1877. Petite Faune Entomologique du Canada précédée d'un Traité élémentaire d'Entomologie. Vol. I. Les Coléoptères. Québec. VIII + 785 pp.Google Scholar
Quennedey, A. 1965. Contribution à la connaisance de quelques types larvaires de Sphaeridiinae (Col., Hydrophilidae). Trav. Lab. Zool. Stn aquic. Grimaldi Dijon 66: 1–56.Google Scholar
Randall, S.W. 1838 a. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the state of Maine. Boston J. nat. Hist. 2: 1–33.Google Scholar
Randall, S.W. 1838 b. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the state of Massachusetts. Boston J. nat. Hist. 2: 34–52.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 1885. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Palpicomes (2nd ed.). Annls Soc. linn. Lyon (N.S.) 31: 213–396.Google Scholar
Richmond, E.A. 1920. Studies on the biology of the aquatic Hydrophilidae. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 42: 1–94, pl. I–XVI.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J. 1880. Bidrag till nordvestra Sibiriens Insektfauna. Coleoptera I. Cicindelidae – Micropeplidae. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Årsb. 17: 1–115.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1823. Descriptions of coleopterous insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the command of Major Long. Jl Acad. nat. Hist. Philad. 3: 139–216.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1824. Appendix to the narrative of an expedition to the source of St. Peter's River…., under the command of Major S.H. Long, U.S.T.E. Western Quarterly Reporter 2: 268–378.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1825. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the United States. Jl Acad. nat. Hist. Philad. 5: 160–204.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1835. Descriptions of new North American coleopterous insects, and observations on some already described. Boston J. nat. Hist. 1: 151–203.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G.C.M. 1887–1891. Fauna Baltica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) der Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Ed. 2. Königsberg. 10 + LVI + 192 + 818 pp.Google Scholar
Semenov, A. 1900. On a new genus of the family Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) and a contribution to a study of parallel morphology. Horae Soc. ent. rossicae 34: 614–630.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1882–1887. Aquatic beetles and Staphylinidae. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera 1, 2. London. 824 pp., 19 pl.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1883. Revision of the species included in the genus Tropisternus (fam. Hydrophilidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond.: 91–117.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. 1915. Studies in Helophorini 1–8. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 51: 2–5, 27–30, 113–118, 130–138, 156–163, 198–204, 233–238, 270–277.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1971. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 79. VI + 303 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1974. Revision o the genus Cymbiodyta Bed. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 93. IV + 113 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1978. Revision of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 105. 292 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1980. Revision of the genus Hydrochara Berth. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 111. 100 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1984. Revision of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Hydrophili dae). Supplementum 2. Can. Ent. 116: 555–566.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1985 a. Revision of the subfamily Helophorinae of the Nearctic region (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 131. 154 pp.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1985 b. Synonymical notes on Hydrophilidae. Coleopts Bull. 39: 328Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1987. Replacement name for Helophorus frater Smetana 1985 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 41: 262.Google Scholar
Solier, A.J.J. 1834. Observations sur la tribu des Hydrophiliens, et principalement sur le genre Hydrophilus de Fabricius. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 3: 299–318.Google Scholar
Spangler, P.J. 1961. Notes on the biology and distribution of Sperchopsis tessellatus (Ziegler) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 15: 105–112.Google Scholar
Spangler, P.J. 1962. Description of the larva and pupa of Ametor scabrosus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 16: 15–19.Google Scholar
Spangler, P.J. 1966. A new cryptic species of Cymbiodyta from the midwestern U.S. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ent. News 77: 211–216.Google Scholar
Stace Smith, G. 1930. Coleoptera of Copper Mt., B.C. Part II. Mus. and Art Notes 5: 22–25.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1833. The nomenclature of British insects…. 2nd ed. London. 136 pp.Google Scholar
Sturm, J. 1807. Deutschlands Fauna….V. Abtheilung. Die Insecten. Vol. 2. Nürnberg, 4 + 279 pp., pl 21–52.Google Scholar
Summers, S.V. 1874. Catalogue of the Coleoptera from the region of Lake Pontchartrain, La. Bull. Buffalo Soc. nat. Sci. 2: 78–99.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1853. Oefversigt af de i Sverige funna arter of Familien Palpicomia. Öfvers. K. VetenskAcad. Förh. 10: 40–58.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1859, 1867. Skandinaviens Coleoptera. Vol. I, Vol. IX. Lund, Vol. I, 304 pp.; Vol. IX, 407 pp.Google Scholar
Van Tassel, Eileen R. 1966. Taxonomy and biology of the subfamily Berosinae of North and Central America and the West Indies. The Catholic Univ. of America. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1866. Descriptions of Coleoptera. In Lord, (Ed.), The Naturalist in Vancouver and British Columbia. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.F. 1895. The Coleoptera of Canada. X.I. The Hydrophilidae of Ontario and Quebec. Can. Ent 27:181–186, 213–216.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.B. 1923. Life history of the scavenger water beetle Hydrous (Hydrophilus) triangularis, and its economic relation to fish breeding. Bull. Bureau Fisheries 39: 9–38.Google Scholar
Winters, F.C. 1926. Notes on the Hydrobiini (Coleoptera – Hydrophilidae) of Boreal America. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 3: 49–58.Google Scholar
Winters, F.C. 1927. Key to the subtribe Helocharae Orchym. (Coleoptera-Hydrophilidae) of Boreal America. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 4: 19–29.Google Scholar
Winters, F.C. 1944. Sphaeridini inhabiting Boreal America. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 39: 94–95.Google Scholar
Wood, D.M., Dang, P.T., and Ellis, R.A.. 1979. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 6. The mosquitoes of Canada. Diptera: Culicidae. Agric. Can. Publ. 1686. 390 pp.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, D.P. 1965. A preliminary check-list of the aquatic Hydrophilidae of Illinois. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 58: 205–206.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, D.P. 1966. Notes on Nearctic Paracymus with descriptions of new species (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 39: 712–725.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, D.P. 1967. The aquatic Hydrophilidae of Illinois. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 60: 422–431.Google Scholar
Young, F.N. 1954. The water beetles of Florida. Univ. Fla. Publ. biol. Sci. Ser. 5 (1): 1–238.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, F.A. 1908. Catalogue des Coléoptères aquatiques des familles des Dryopidae, Georyssidae, Cyathoceridae, Heteroceridae et Hydrophilidae. Horae Soc. ent. rossicae 38: 283–420.Google Scholar
Ziegler, D. 1844. Descriptions of new North American Coleoptera. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 2: 43–417.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, C. 1869. Synonymical notes on Coleoptera of the United States, with descriptions of new species, from the MSS. of the late Dr. C. Zimmermann. Edited by John L. LeConte, M.D. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 2: 243–259.Google Scholar