Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T01:21:06.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS OF CANADIAN PEATLANDS: SYNOPSIS OF PAN TRAP COLLECTIONS AT FOUR SOUTHERN ONTARIO PEATLANDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David C.A. Blades  and
Stephen A. Marshall
David C.A. Blades
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Stephen A. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access

Abstract

This report is a synopsis of the terrestrial arthropod faunas collected from four peatlands in southern Ontario. The peatlands surveyed were the Wylde Lake bog (43°55′N, 80°30′W), Crieff fen (43°25′N, 80°07′W), Oliver bog (43°20′N, 80°16′W), and the Wainfleet bog (42°55′N, 79°17′W). Arthropods were collected in yellow pan traps (aluminum pan traps at Wainfleet) during the period May 1987 to June 1988 (including the period of snow cover from December to March). A total of 33 029 specimens were removed from the pan trap samples and of these 17 173 individuals were assigned to species. Between 603 and 870 species of arthropods were identified from each site. Collections from each site were compared using taxonomic and ecological groupings (based on feeding behaviour and habitat preference) of species. Sorensen's Index of Similarity was used to compare the overlap of species among sites. The Hymenoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, and Araneae were the most species-rich orders collected at each site. More species preferring peatlands were collected at each of the three undisturbed peatlands (Wylde L., Crieff, and Oliver) than at the mined bog, Wainfleet. Species not usually associated with peatlands were more numerous in the Wainfleet collection than in collections from the undisturbed sites. It is concluded that grouping of species by habitat preference is a useful technique for assessing habitat disturbance.

Résumé

On trouvera ici un compte-rendu des arthropodes terrestres récoltés dans quatre tourbières du sud de l’Ontario. Les tourbières échantillonnées sont la troubière ombrotrophe du lac Wylde (43°55′N, 80°30′O), la tourbière minérotrophe Crieff (43°25′N, 80°07′O) et les tourbières ombrotrophes Oliver (43°20′N, 80°16′O) et Wainfleet (42°55′N, 79°17′O). Les arthropodes ont été récoltés au moyen de pièges à cuvettes jaunes (cuvettes d’aluminium à Wainfleet) de mai 1987 à juin 1988 (y compris la période de couverture de neige de décembre à mars). Au total, 33 029 spécimens ont été recueillis dans les échantillons et 17 173 ont pu être identifiés à l’espèce. À chaque endroit, entre 603 et 870 espèces d’arthropodes ont été reconnues. Les récoltes des différentes tourbières ont été comparées au moyen de regroupements taxonomiques et de regroupements écologiques d’espèces (basés sur les habitudes alimentaires et les préférences d’habitat). Le chevauchement entre les tourbières a été évalué au moyen de l’indice de similarité de Sorensen. Les hyménoptères, les diptères, les coléoptères et les araignées étaient les ordres les plus riches en espèces représentés dans les tourbières. Plus d’espèces reliées aux tourbières ont été récoltées dans chacune des trois tourbières non perturbées (lac Wylde, Crieff et Oliver) qu’à la tourbière Wainfleet qui est soumise à l’exploitation minière. Les espèces non directement associées aux tourbières étaient plus abondantes dans la tourbière de Wainfleet que dans les tourbières non perturbées. Nous concluons que le regroupement des espèces en fonction de leur préférence d’habitat constitue une bonne méthode d’évaluation des parturbations du milieu. [Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 126 , Supplement S169 , 1994 , pp. 221 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: #4 - 957 Meares Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8V 3J5.

References

Blades, D.C.A. 1990. Faunistics and Ecology of Arthropods in Four Ontario Peatlands. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.332 pp.Google Scholar
Bray, S.M. 1986. Floristic Analyses of the Bogs and Fens of the Great Lakes Region. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.Google Scholar
Butterfield, J., and Coulson, J.C.. 1983. The carabid communities on peat and upland grasslands in northern England. Holarctic Ecology 6: 163–174.Google Scholar
Coulson, J.C., and Butterfield, J.. 1986. The spider communities on peat and upland grasslands in northern England. Holarctic Ecology 9: 229–239.Google Scholar
Coulson, J.C., and Whittaker, J.B.. 1978. Ecology of moorland animals, pp. 52–94in Heal, O.W., and Perkins, D.F. (Eds.), Production Ecology of British Moors and Montane Grasslands. Springer-Verlag, Britain.Google Scholar
Curtis, D.J. 1980. Pitfalls in spider community studies. Journal of Arachnology 8: 271–280.Google Scholar
Cwikla, P.S. 1987. Annotated list of leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from two Ohio fens with a description of a new Chlorotettix. Ohio Journal of Science 87(4): 134–137.Google Scholar
Dawson, J.B. 1958. Study of Some Wetlands in Southern Ontario with Special Reference to Ducks. M.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.Google Scholar
Dice, L.R. 1943. The Biotic Provinces of North America. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Drees, B.M. 1982. A checklist of horse flies and deer flies (Diptera: Tabanidae) of Cedar Bog, Champaign County, Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 82: 170–176.Google Scholar
Farkas, M.J., and Brust, R.A.. 1986. Pitcher-plant sarcophagids from Manitoba and Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 118: 1307–1308.Google Scholar
Finnamore, A.T. 1994. Hymenoptera of the Wagner Natural Area, a boreal spring fen in central Alberta. pp. 181–220 in Finnamore, A.T., and Marshall, S.A. (Eds.), Terrestrial Arthropods of Peatlands, with Particular Reference to Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 169: 289 pp.Google Scholar
Fraser, J.Z. 1989. The Wainfleet bog: A recent example of government and private agency cooperation in wetland conservation and management. In Bardecki, M.J., and Patterson, N. (Eds.), Wetlands, Inertia or Momentum. Federation of Ontario Naturalists, Don Mills, Ont.426 pp.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J.S. (Ed.). 1932. The Natural History of Wicken Fen. Bowes and Bowes, Cambridge, U.K. 652 pp.Google Scholar
Glooschenko, V., Parker, B., Coo, L., Kent, R., Wedeles, C., Mason, A., Dawson, J., Herman, D., and Smith, P.. 1987. Provincially and Regionally Significant Wetlands in Southern Ontario. Interim Report — 1987. Wildlife Branch, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, Ont.Google Scholar
Gore, A.J.P. (Ed.). 1983. Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen, and Moor. Ecosystems of the World, Vols. 4a,b. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co., New York, NY. 440 pp.Google Scholar
Greenslade, P.J.M. 1964. Pitfall trapping as a method of studying populations of Carabidae (Coleoptera). Journal Animal Ecology 33: 301–310.Google Scholar
Heinrich, B. 1976. Flowering phenologies: Bog, woodland and disturbed habitats. Ecology 57: 890–899.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1957 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. I. Description of the bog. The Canadian Entomologist 89: 235–238.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1957 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. III. Exyra rolandia Grt. (Lepidoptera: Phalaenidae) reared from the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L. The Canadian Entomologist 89: 564.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1957 c. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. IV. Seasonal distribution of the black fly, Simulium vittatum Zett. (Diptera: Simuliidae). Entomological News 68: 263–265.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1958 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. V. Seasonal distribution of horseflies and deerflies (Tabanidae). The Canadian Entomologist 90: 255–256.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1958 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. VI. Seasonal distribution of the wood gnat, Sylvicola marginata (Say) (Diptera: Sylvicolidae). Entomological News 69: 65–67.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1958 c. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. VIII. Seasonal distribution of filth flies. American Midland Naturalist 60: 186–195.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1958 d. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. IX. Insects trapped as adults emerging from Redmond's Pond. The Canadian Entomologist 90: 623–627.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1959 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. VII. Wasps reared from the blueberry stem gall on Vaccinium atrococcum. Transactions of the American Microscopal Society 78: 212–214.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1959 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. X. Inquilines and victims of the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea L. The Canadian Entomologist 91: 171–180.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1960. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XI. Seasonal distribution of adult insects in the Chamaedaphne calyculata association. The Canadian Entomologist 92: 241–251.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1961. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XII. A study of the population of insects emerging as adults from Redmond's Pond in 1957. American Midland Naturalist 65: 89–100.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1962. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XIII. Seasonal distribution of wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Entomological News 73: 79–81.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1963 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XIV. Observations on sowbugs Cylisticus convexus (DeGeer) and Tracheoniscus rathkei (Brandt) (Isopoda: Oniscidae). Ecology 44: 615–617.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1963 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XVI. Seasonal distribution of Hemiptera (Corixidae, Notonectidae, Belostomatidae, Nepidae) in Redmond's Pond. The Canadian Entomologist 95: 1109–1111.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1964. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXI. Distribution of centipedes (Chilopoda) and millipedes (Diplopoda). Natural History Papers, National Museum of Canada 26.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1965 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XVIII. Distribution of harvestmen and spiders in the bog. Natural History Papers, National Museum of Canada 28.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1965 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XX. Insects and millipeds associated with fungi. Canadian Field Naturalist 79: 25–28.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1966 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXIII. Insects associated with the flowering leatherleaf, Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench. Transactions of the American Microscopal Society 85: 303–305.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1966 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXVII. Insects associated with flowering blueberry, Vaccinium atrococcum (Gray) Heller. Canadian Field Naturalist 80: 242–244.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1967a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXXII. Observations on the seasonal distribution of Odonata in the bog. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 98: 45–48.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1967 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXXIII. Distribution of Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) in the bog. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 98: 48–52.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1968. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXXVIII. Insects associated with flowering boneset, Eupatorium perfoliatum L. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 99: 65–69.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1969. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XXXIX. Insects trapped in the leaves of sundew, Drosera intermedia Hayne and Drosera rotundifolia L. Canadian Field Naturalist 83: 233–237.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1970 a. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XLII. Distribution of mites (Acarina) in the bog. Canadian Field Naturalist 85: 65–66.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1970 b. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XLIV. Flies (Sarcophagidae, Muscidae, and Tachinidae) trapped in the bog. Entomological News 81: 189–190.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1970 c. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XLV. Insects associated with flowering dandelion, Taraxacum officinale Weber. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 101: 59–62.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1971. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XLVI. Ground beetles (Carabidae) from the damp, wooded zone of the bog. Entomological News 82: 225–227.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1972. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XLVII. Insects of the Sphagnum mat. Entomological News 83: 145–151.Google Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1973. Studies of the Byron Bog in Southwestern Ontario. XLIX. Additional observations on the insects of Redmond's Pond. Entomological News 84: 96–98.Google Scholar
Kirk, W.D.J. 1984. Ecologically selective colored traps. Ecological Entomology 9: 35–41.Google Scholar
Krogerus, R. 1960. Okologische Studien uber nordische Moorarthropoden. Artenbestand, okologische Faktoren, Korrelation der Arten. Commentaciones biologicae 21(3): 1–238.Google Scholar
Krombein, K. et al. , 1979. The Catalog of Hymenoptera North of Mexico. Vols. 1–3. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Mason, C.F., and Standen, V.. 1983. Aspects of secondary production. pp. 367–382 in Gore, A.J.P. (Ed.), Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen, and Moor. Ecosystems of the World, Vols. 4a,b. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co., New York, NY. 440 pp.Google Scholar
Pearson, R.G., and White, E.. 1964. The phenology of some surface-active arthropods of moorland country in North Wales. Journal of Animal Ecology 33: 245–258.Google Scholar
Pendreigh, K.M., and Marshall, S.A.. 1986. The terrestrial, saprophagous Diptera of an Ontario bog, with special reference to small dung flies (Sphaeroceridae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 117: 15–19.Google Scholar
Reader, R. 1975. Competitive relationships of some bog ericads for major insect pollinators. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 1300–1305.Google Scholar
Reader, R. 1976. Bog ericad flowers: Self-compatability and relative attractiveness to bees. Canadian Journal of Botany 55: 2279–2287.Google Scholar
Reichle, D.E. 1966. Some pselaphid beetles with boreal affinities and their distribution along the postglacial fringe. Systematic Zoology 15: 330–344.Google Scholar
Reichle, D.E. 1967. The temperature and humidity relations of some bog pselaphid beetles. Ecology 48: 208–215.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D.M., and Danks, H.V.. (Eds.). 1987. Aquatic insects of peatlands and marshes in Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 140: 174 pp.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D.M., Wiens, A.P., and Bilyj, B.. 1988. Chironomidae (Diptera) of peatlands in northwestern Ontario, Canada. Holarctic Ecology 11: 19–31.Google Scholar
Small, E. 1976. Insect pollinators of Mer Blue peat bog of Ottawa. Canadian Field Naturalist 90(1): 22–28.Google Scholar
Sorensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation of Danish commons. Konagelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 5: 1–34.Google Scholar
Thiele, H.-U. 1977. Carabid Beetles in their Environments. A Study on Habitat Selection by Adaptations in Physiology and Behaviour. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 369 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, T.J. Jr., 1957. Ecological studies of the arthropods associated with certain decaying materials in four habitats. Ecology 38: 262–276.Google Scholar
Wolcott, A.B., and Montgomery, B.E.. 1933. An ecological study of the coleopterous fauna of a tamarack swamp. American Midland Naturalist 14: 113–169.Google Scholar
Wormington, A., Elkirt, W., Kirk, D., and Loebel, K.. 1977. North Wellington county environmentally sensitive areas. Centre for Resources Development, Publication # 84. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.Google Scholar