Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:49:58.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The paragenesis of Cookeite and hydromuscovite associated with gold at Ogofau, Carmarthenshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

A. Brammall
Affiliation:
Geological Department, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London
J. G. C. Leech
Affiliation:
Geological Department, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London
F. A. Bannister
Affiliation:
Mineral Department of the British Museum of Natural History

Extract

This paper describes occurrences of cookeite (not previously recorded as a British species) and hydromuacovite, associated with auriferous pyrite and arsenopyrite, blende, galena, carbonates, and free gold at Ogofau, on the left bank of the river Cothi, half a mile ESE. of Pumpsaint, Carmarthenshire.

The hillside around Ogofau is scarred with opencast workings and trenches reputed to be an 'ancient gold mine' dating back to Roman times. Though the mine is described as 'disused' on the Ordnance Survey map (six-inchcs/mile, Sheet XVII, NW.), these surface workings have been exploited for free gold intermittently within the last fifty years, and recent development work (by the Roman Deep Holdings,Ltd.) from a shaft sunk in 1910 is approaching the producing stage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 510 note 1 Several specimens, including a portion of the material used for chemical analysis, have been presented to the Trustees of the British Museum.

Page 512 note 1 Bowman, H. L., Min. Mag., 1902, vol. 13, p. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 512 note 2 Gevers, T. W. and Frommurze, H. F., Trans. Gcol. Soc. South Africa, 1930, vol. 32 (for 1929), p. 139.Google Scholar [M.A. 4-411.] de Kock, W.P., Trans. Geol. Soc. South Africa, 1933, vol. 35 (for 1932), p. 97.Google Scholar [M.A. 5-421.]

Page 513 note 1 No flakes, however, were found with a uniaxial centre surrounded by a biaxial rim, similar to those recorded by Penfield and Landes from Maine.

Page 513 note 2 Hendricks, S. B., Zeits. Krist., 1929, vol. 71, p. 269.Google Scholar [M.A. 4-160.]

Page 514 note 1 Pauliug, L., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1930, vol. 16, p. 578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar [M.A. 4- 465.]

Page 514 note 2 McMurchy, R. C., Zeits. Krist., 1934, vol. 88, p. 420.Google Scholar [M.A. 6-45.]

Page 515 note 1 McMurchy, R. C., Zeits. Krist., 1934, vol. 88, p. 420.Google Scholar [M.A. 6-45.]

Page 515 note 2 Jackson, W. W. and West, J., Zeits. Krist., 1930, vol. 76, p. 211.Google Scholar [.M.A. 4-467.]

Page 516 note 1 Hallimond, A. F., Min. Mag., 1925, vol. 20, p. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar