Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:17:25.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An overview of radionuclide behaviour research for the UK geological disposal programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

S. Vines  and
R. Beard
S. Vines*
Affiliation:
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, Radioactive Waste Management Directorate, NDA Harwell Office, Building 587, Curie Avenue, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RH, UK
R. Beard
Affiliation:
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, Radioactive Waste Management Directorate, NDA Harwell Office, Building 587, Curie Avenue, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RH, UK
*
*E-mail: sarah.vines@nda.gov.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the UK, radioactive wastes currently planned for disposal in a geological disposal facility (GDF) are intermediate-level waste, some low-level waste and high-level waste. Disposal of other materials, including spent fuel, separated uranium and separated plutonium are also included in the planning of a GDF, if such materials are classified as wastes in the future. This paper gives an overview of the radionuclide behaviour research studies of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Radioactive Waste Management Directorate (NDA RWMD). The NDA RWMD's current understanding of the processes that control radionuclide behaviour in groundwater and how the engineered and natural barriers in a GDF would contain radionuclides is presented. Areas requiring further work are also identified.

Keywords

solubilitysorptioncomplexationresearch and development
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 8 , December 2012 , pp. 3373 - 3380
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2012] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

References

Baston, G.M.N. and Dawson, J. (2012) NAPL Generation from PVC Aged in Aqueous Solutions. Serco Report SERCO/TAS/002834/002.Google Scholar
Baston, G.M.N., Brownsword, M., Smith, A.J. and Smith-Briggs, J.L. (1997) Further Near-field Solubility Studies. Nirex Report NSS/R257.Google Scholar
Clacher, A.P. and Cowper, M.M. (2011) Effect of ADVA Cast 551 on the Solubility of Plutonium(IV) and Uranium(VI). Serco Report SERCO/TAS/003145/ 001 Issue 02.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. (2012) The potential for non-aqueous phase liquid production from irradiated PVC and vinylstyrene (VES). Serco Report SERCO/TAS/1008 Department for Environment Fisheries and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) and the Devolved Administration for Wales and Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
(2008) Managing Radioactive Waste Safely: A Framework for Implementing Geological Disposal. DEFRA, London, 100 pp.Google Scholar
Harrison, M.T. (2011) Review of Glass Dissolution Rates for use in the Disposal System Safety Case Performance Assessment Models. National Nuclear Laboratory Report NNL(10)10734 Issue 3.Google Scholar
Hayes, M., Angus, M. and Garland, R. (2012) Current Status Paper on the Potential Use of Superplasticisers in a Geological Disposal Facility. National Nuclear Laboratory Report NNL(12)11905.Google Scholar
Heath, T. and Williams, S.J. (2005) Effects of Organic Complexants and their Treatment in Performance Assessments. Serco Report SA/ENV-0726.Google Scholar
Heath, T., Pilkington, N.J., Tweed, C. and Williams, S. (1998) Radionuclide solubility at high pH. In: The Chemistry of Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste (S. Baker, T.G. Heath and R. McCrohon, editors). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Chemistry/Nirex Symposium. Nirex Report S/98/008.Google Scholar
Humphries, P.N., Laws, A. and Dawson, J. (2010) A Review of Cellulose Degradation and the Fate of Degradation Products Under Repository Conditions. Serco Report SERCO/TAS/002274/001.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2006) Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Specific Safety Requirements. Safety Standards Series Report SSR-5. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2009) Record of an Expert Meeting to discuss the Forward Strategy for the Hatches database. NDA Report 9446386.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010a) Geological Disposal: Radionuclide Behaviour Status Report. NDA report NDA/RWMD/034.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010b) Geological Disposal: Gas Status Report. NDA Report NDA/RWMD/037.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010c) Geological Disposal: Biosphere Status Report. NDA Report NDA/RWMD/036.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010d) Geological Disposal: An Overview of the Generic Disposal System Safety Case. NDA Report NDA/ RWMD/010.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010e) Geological Disposal: Generic Post-Closure Safety Assessment. NDA Report NDA/RWMD/030, 2010.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2011) R&D Programme Overview - Research and Development Needs in the Current Preparatory Studies Phase. NDA Report NDA/RWMD/073.Google Scholar
Randall, M., Rigby, B., Thompson, O. and Trivedi, D. (2012) Assessment of the effects of cellulose degradation products on the behaviour of europium and thorium. National Nuclear Laboratory Report NNL(12)12236.Google Scholar
SKB (2006) Buffer and Backfill process report for the safety assessment SR-Can. SKB Technical Report TR-06–18. September 2006. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB), Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Small, J., Thompson, O. and Trivedi, D. (2011) Data Packs for Use in the Elicitation of Solubility and Sorption of Carbon Species in a Cementitious Near Field and for Sorption in the Far Field. National Nuclear Laboratory Report NNL(08)9537 Issue .Google Scholar
Swanton, S.W., Alexander, W.R. and Berry, J.A. (2010) Review of the behaviour of colloids in the near field of a cementitious repository. Serco Report SERCO/ TAS/000475/01 Issue 02.Google Scholar
Utton, C., Hand, R.J., Hyatt, N.C. and Swanton, S.W. (2011) Glass durability in high pH environments: A review of the literature. Serco Report SERCO/TAS/ 003133/001.Google Scholar
Watson, S., Benbow, S., Chittenden, N., Lansdell, A., Rivett, M.O. and Towler, G. (2012) Potential for Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids to Influence Radionuclide Migration. Amec report 17698/TR/03.Google Scholar
Wealthall, G. (2002) Migration of NAPLs in the Geosphere: Implications for Repository Performance. British Geological Survey Report CR/02/284. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK.Google Scholar
White, M., Baldwin, T., Hicks, T. and Hooker, P. (2008) Engineered Barrier Materials for Geological Disposal Facilities. Galson Sciences Report 0828–1. version 1, November 2008.Google Scholar