Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T14:52:00.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Imperial Coronation of 1819: Awadh, the British and the Mughals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael H. Fisher
Michael H. Fisher
Affiliation:
Western Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The interaction among the expanding British, the regional rulers of the Gangetic plain, and Mughal Emperors stands central to Indian history during the first half of the nineteenth century. Each of these three groups determined to advance its own political and cultural values in the face of the conflicting expectations and assumptions of the other two. The English East India Company regarded itself as under the authority of the British Parliament and the sovereignty of the British crown. At the same time, the Company continued nominally to acknowledge the sovereignty of the Mughal Emperor, at least in India. The various regional rulers of north India, most prominently the rulers of the province of Awadh, acted and apparently perceived themselves as de facto independent of the Mughals while also symbolically submitted to Mughal sovereignty. The Mughal Emperors, whose power to command armies had faded to nothingness during the last half of the eighteenth century, continued to pretend to absolute sovereignty over virtually all of India until 1858. Each of these three groups wished to see the 1819 imperial coronation by the Awadh ruler as an overt proof of their own cultural values and of their understanding of their relationships to the others.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 239 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Minutes of 18 November 1814, Bengal Secret Consultations [hereinafter cited as BSC] 18 November 1814, No. 19, Commonwealth Relations Office, London.

2 William Edwards records his personal participation in such a ceremony in 1843, carried out, however, without the prior approval of his superiors in the Company. Reminiscences of a Bengal Civilian (London: Smith Elder, 1866), p. 12.Google Scholar

3 E.g. 'Shārar, Abd al-Halim, Guẕishta Lakhn’ū: Mashriqī Tammadun kā Ākhri Namōna (Lucknow: Nasim Book Depot, 1965 reprint), pp. 50–4.Google ScholarIrwin, H. C., The Garden of India or Chapters on Oudh History and Affairs, 2 vols (Lucknow: Pustak Kendra, 1973 reprint), 1:98.Google Scholar

4 The Awadh rulers, for example, continued to implement land grants made by the Mughal Emperor. E.g. Persian Ms 10696, Regional Archives, Allahabad. Asafuddaula to Governor General, received 31 May 1780, India, Imperial Record Department, Calendar of Persian Correspondence, 12 vols (Calcutta: India, Imperial Record Department, 1911-), 5:425.Google Scholar

5 Cf. No. 1, Type A in Brown, C. J., ‘The Coins of the Kings of Awadh,’ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, n.s. 8, no. 6, Numismatic Supplement (06 1912): 249–79.Google Scholar

6 Resident to Governor General, 13 July 1814, Bengal Political Consultations [hereinafter cited as BPC] 28 July 1814, Commonwealth Relations Office, London.

7 Resident to Council, 16 April 1776, Foreign Secret Consultations [hereinafter cited as FSC] 29 April 1776, Commonwealth Relations Office, London.

8 Persian MS 84, Regional Archives, Allahabad.

9 Valentia, George Viscount, Voyages and Travels to India, Ceylon, the Red Sea, Abyssinia, and Egypt in the Years 1802 … 1806, 3 vols (London: William Miller, 1809), p. 146.Google Scholar

10 Hastings, Lord, ‘Summary of Operations in India,’ in Great Britain, Parliament, Parliamentary Papers (Commons), 1831–32, vol. 8, ‘Report of the Select Committee,’ Section 4:110.Google Scholar

11 Khan, Seid Gholam Hossein, Seir Mutaqherin, trans. Mustafa, M. Raymond alias Haji, 4 vols (Calcutta: T. D. Chatterjee, 1902), 3:332.Google Scholar

12 Shuja uddaula to King of England, 1 September 1173, Calendar of Persian Correspondence, 4:478. See Glieg, George Robert, Memoirs of the Life of the Right Hon. Warren Hastings, 3 vols (London: Richard Bentley, 1841), 2:332.Google Scholar

13 Bahādur Singh, ‘Yādgār-i Bahādurī,’ Persian MS 225, Regional Archives, Allahabad. Resident to Governor General, 7 May 1775, FSC 22 May 1775, no. 5. Polier, Antoine Louis Henri, Shah Allam II and His Court, ed. Gupta, Pratul Chandra (Calcutta: S. C. Sarkar, 1947), pp. 42, 44–5.Google Scholar

14 Nawab Wazir to Governor General, 23 December 1784, FSC 28 December 1784.

15 Shuka of the Mughal Emperor given in translation, Resident to Governor General, 15 July 1794, Home Miscellaneous Series, 447:279–82, Commonwealth Relations Office, London.

16 Shuka of the Mughal Emperor to the Resident at the Wazir's court, given in translation, 18 June 1794, Home Miscellaneous Series, 447:283, Commonwealth Relations Office, London. Prince Jehandar Shah to Governor General, 23 December FSC 28 December 1787.

17 For discussion of the Lucknow school see Bahādur Singh, fols 284b–86, Ali, Ahmed, The Golden Tradition: An Anthology of Urdu Poetry (New York: Columbia University Press, 1973)Google Scholar, Russell, Ralph and Islam, Khurshidul, Three Mughal Poets: Mir, Sauda, Mir Hasan (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1968)Google Scholar, and Sadiq, Muhammad, A History of Urdu Literature (Allahabad: Ram Narain Lal, 1940).Google Scholar

18 See Llewellyn-Jones, Rosie, ‘The City of Lucknow before 1856,’ in The City in South Asia: Pre-Modern and Modern, ed. Ballhatchet, Kenneth and Harrison, John (London: Centre of South Asian Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies, 1980), pp. 88–128.Google Scholar

19 For the significance of this office see Encyclopedia of Islam, 2d edn, s.v. ‘idjtihād.’

20 E.g. Nawab Wazir to Resident, 11 September 1816, BPC, 20 February 1818. Resident to Secretary to Government, Secret and Political, BPC 16 November 1827, no. 12.

21 Until 1189/1775, the coins struck by the Nawābs had been made in their Benaras mint; after that date, they were made in the Lucknow mint. As with the coins struck by the Company, their coins had been standardized from 1201/1786–87, bearing not the proper regnal year but rather all having the regnal year 26. Further, while the coins sent as specimens to the Emperor continued to be inscribed in accordance with his proper regnal year and titles, the coins circulated for public use continued to follow the standardized pattern and did not carry the name of the new Emperor, Akbar II, who acceded in 1806. See Brown, C. J., ‘The Coins of Awadh,’ Catalogue of the Coins in the India Museum, Calcutta, vol. 4 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928), pp. 1–60.Google ScholarThurston, Edgar, ‘Notes on the History of the East India Company Coins from 1753 to 1835,’ Journal ofthe Asiatic Society of Bengal 62, pt I (1893): 72.Google Scholar The East India Company continued to present these coins to the Emperor until 1835. Pannikar, K. N., British Diplomacy in North India: A Study of the Delhi Residency, 1803–1857 (New Delhi: Associated Publishing House, 1968), p. 141.Google Scholar

22 Resident to Governor General, 28 April 1800, FSC 15 May 1800, no. 6.

23 For a detailed study of a comparable event, see Madelung, Wilfred, ‘The Assumption of the Title Shahanshah by the Buyids,’ Journal of Near Eastern Studies 28, no. 2 (04 1969): 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Rawdon-Hastings, Francis, The Private Journal of the Marquess of Hastings, ed. Marchioness of Bute, 2 vols (London: Saunders and Otley, 1858), 1:19.Google Scholar

25 Minutes of 1 December 1815, Home Miscellaneous Series, vol. 603, Common wealth Relations Office, London.

26 Hastings, , Journal, 1:30.Google Scholar

27 Hastings, , ‘Summary,’ p. 110.Google Scholar

28 Hastings, , Journal, 1:171–2.Google Scholar

29 Haydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 2 vols (Lucknow: Nevil Kishore Press, 1907), 1:243.Google Scholar (My translation.)

30 Hastings, , Journal, 1:170–1.Google Scholar

31 'Alī, Muhammad Ahmad, Muraqqa'-i Awadh (title page missing, 1912), pp. 42–3.Google Scholar Interviews with Dr Taqi Ahmad in Lucknow and Aligarh in April, October, and December 1976 have established the contents of this ambassador's coded communications with the Awadh court.

32 Governor General to Court of Directors, 15 August 1814, Political Letter, Commonwealth Relations Office, London.

33 Hastings, , ‘Summary,’ p. 110.Google Scholar

34 Quoted in Kamāl al-Dīn Haydar, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 1:244.Google Scholar

35 Hastings, , ‘Summary,’ p. 110.Google Scholar Governor General to Court of Directors, 15 August 1814, Political Letter, Commonwealth Relations Office, London. Haydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 1:244. (My translation.)Google Scholar

36 The title Pādshāh means sovereign emperor. The Āīn-i Akbari glosses the title as: Pad, meaning stability and possession, Shah meaning origin or lord, thus ‘Lord or origin of stability and possession.’ 'Aliami, Abu 'l-Fazl, The Āīn-i Akbari, trans. Blockman, H. B., ed. Phillott, D. C. (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1927). p. 2.Google Scholar An early nineteenth-century author wrote extensively about the necessary attributes of a Pādshāh: justice, politics, vigor, munificence and bravery, supported by pomp, dignity, and bearing. Hasan, Sayyid Aqā, Ihsān al-Tawārīkh, 3 vols (Lucknow: Jangbahaduri Press, 1863–1865), 3:568–79.Google Scholar

37 Shārar, Guẕishta Lakhna'ū, pp. 87–8.Google Scholar

38 No. 1, Type A in Brown, , ‘Coins of the Kings of Awadh,’ p. 257.Google Scholar Each successive Awadh Pādshāh designed a more elaborate coat of arms along the same pattern. E.g. Persian MSS 162, 166–8, National Archives of India, New Delhi.

39 Haydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 1:244.Google Scholar

40 Resident to Governor General, 16 November 1819, BPC 20 November 1819.

41 Resident to Secretary to Government, 7 April 1819, BPC 24 April 1819, no. 57. This is probably No. 2, Type B in Brown, , ‘Coins of the Kings of Awadh,’ p. 257.Google Scholar

42 Nawab Wazir to Governor General, received 22 April 1819, BPC 7 August 1819. King of Oudh to Resident, 30 June 1825, BPC 14 October 1825, no. 13.

43 Resident to Secretary to Government, 7 April 1819, BPC 24 April 1819, no. 59. Governor General to Nawab Wazir, 1 August 1819, BPC 7 August 1819. Resident to Secretary to Government, 27 August 1819, BPC 25 September 1819.

44 Hāshim 'Ali Rizwī, ‘Mir'āt al-Bilād,’ Persian MS 2551, Regional Archives, Allahabad, fols. 144a and b. Khan, Amīr 'Ali, Wazīr Nāma (Cawnpur: Nizami Press, 1876), p. 28.Google ScholarPrasād, Kunwar Durgā, Bostān-i Awadh (Sandila: Queens Press, 1888), p. 413.Google Scholar

45 El, s.v. ‘Mūsa al Kāzim.’ The Safawids also claimed descent from this Imam.

46 al-Ghanī, Najam, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 5 vols (Lucknow: Nevil Kishore, 1919), 4:141–142.Google Scholar See Buckler, F. W., ‘The Political Theory of the Indian Mutiny,’ Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 4th Series, 5 (1922): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarHaidar, Muhammad, Tarikh-i Rashidi, trans. Ross, E. Denison, ed. Elias, Ney (London: S. Low, Marston and Company, 1898), pp. 238, 246–7.Google Scholar

47 El, s.v. ‘umma.’

48 Ibid., s.v. ‘idjtihād.’

49 In 1840, for example, the Awadh Pādshāh refused to accept at face value any coins but his own. Resident to Accountant, N.W. Provinces, n.d., IPC 22 June 1840, no. 130. Later the British rejected coins that they suspected had been issued by Birjīs Qadr, the leader of the ‘mutineers’ in Awadh. T. D. Forsyth, Secretary to Chief Commissioner, Lucknow, circular of 7 January 1859, no. 1/27 of 1859, U.P. State Archives, Lucknow, Board of Revenue, file 2273.

50 al-Ghanī, Najm, 4:141.Google Scholar

51 No. 3, Type D in Brown, , ‘Coins of the Kings,’ p. 258.Google Scholar

52 SirBurn, Richard, ‘The Coronation Medal of the First King of Oudh,’ Journal of the Numismatic Society of India 3, pt 2 (12 1941): 113–14.Google Scholar

53 al-Ghanī, Najm, 4:144.Google ScholarHaydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 1:245.Google Scholar

54 Husain, Khan Bahadur Pirzada Muhammad, ‘The Coronation of Muhammadan Sovereigns,’ Journal of the Panjab Historical Society 2 (1912): 142.Google ScholarJalaluddin, , ‘Sultan Salim (Jahangir) as a Rebel King,’ Islamic Culture 47, no. 2 (04 1973): 121–5.Google Scholar

55 MrsAli, Meer Hassan, Observations on the Mussulmauns of India, 2 vols (London: Parbury Allen, 1832), 11268–9.Google Scholar Resident to Secretary to Government, 20 October 1819, BPC 20 November 1819, no. 98. al-Ghanī, Najm, 4:144.Google Scholar

56 The use of a regular crown or coronation as a symbol of royal power is virtually unknown in Islamic tradition. El, s.v. ‘tadj.’

57 Shārar, Guẕishta Lakhn'ū, pp. 305–6.Google ScholarDrHoffmeister, W., Travels in Ceylon and Continental India (Edinburgh: William F. Kennedy, 1848), p. 261.Google Scholar Delhi, Museum of Archaeology, Loan Exhibit of Antiquities: Coronation Durbar of 1911. An Illustrated Selection of the Principal Exhibits (Calcutta: Archaeological Survey of India, n.d.), plate 14, A 375, p. 32, figures 1–3. Baird, J. G. A. (ed.), Private Letters of the Marquis of Dalhousie (Edinburgh: William Blackwood, 1911), p. 169.Google Scholar

58 Home, Robert, ‘Album’, and Smith, Robert, ‘Pictorial Journal of Travels in Hindustan, 1828–1833’, vol. 2, fol. 603Google Scholar, Oriental Students' Room, Victoria and Albert Museum, London. Major [Edward C.] Archer, Tours in Upper India and in Parts of the Himalayan Mountains, 2 vols (London: Richard Bentley, 1833), 1:17.Google Scholar

59 EI, s.v. ‘Ghadir ul Khumm.’

60 Resident to Secretary to Government, 12 October 1819, BPC 20 November 1819, no. 98.

61 Ibid.

62 Ibid.

63 Buckler, F. W., ‘The Oriental Despot,’ Anglican Theological Review 10 (1927–1928) 1238–49.Google Scholar

64 Resident to Secretary to Government, 12 October 1819, BPC 20 November 1819, no. 98.

65 Ibid.

66 Hastings, , ‘Summary,’ p. 111.Google ScholarArcher, , Tours, 1:21.Google Scholar

67 Resident to Secretary to Government, 16 November 1819, BPC 20 November 1819.

68 Archer, , Tours, 1:21.Google Scholar

69 Haydar, Sayyid Kamāl al-Dīn, Lucknow Almanac for the γear 1849 (Lucknow: H.M. Press, 1849), p. 46.Google Scholar

70 Haydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tarīkh-i Awadh, 1:245–6.Google Scholar

71 Mirza Soleman Shookoh letter received 3 July 1828, BPC 1 August 1828, no. 17.

72 Heber, Reginald, Narrative of a Journey through the Upper Provinces of India from Calcutta to Bombay, 1824 to 1825, 2 vols (Philadelphia: Carey, Lea and Carey, 1828), 1:313.Google ScholarElliott, Charles A., Chronicles of Oonao, A District of Oudh (Allahabad: Allahabad Mission Press, 1862), p. 123.Google ScholarArcher, , Tours, 1:21.Google Scholar

73 al-Ghanī, Najm, 4:146.Google Scholar

74 Resident Hyderabad [Russell] to Governor General, 22 January 1820, BSC 22 January 1820, no. 13.

75 Arzdasht from Raja Bijy Bahadur of Churkurry to the Address of the King of Oudh, BPC 3 February 1821, no. 5.

76 Deputy Secretary to Government to the Agent of the Governor General in Bundelkund, 3 February 1821, BPC 3 February 1821, no. 6.

77 Resident to Secretary to Government, 2 January 1828, BPC 25 January 1828, no. 22.

78 King of Delhi to King of England, 17 March 1821, BPC 17 March 1821, no. 73. Prinsip to Ochterlony, 10 March 1821, BPC 10 March 1821, no. 74.

79 'All, Muhammad Ahmad, p. 45.Google Scholar

80 Ibid.

81 Haydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tarīkh-i Awadh, quotes this Persian proclamation, 1:244.Google Scholar

82 Secretary to Government to Resident, 20 November 1819, BPC 20 November 1819, no. 59.

83 Ibid.

84 King of Oudh to Governor General, 29 March 1820, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 22.

85 King of Oudh to Resident, 30 June 1825, BPC 14 October 1825, no. 13.

86 King of Oudh to Governor General, 29 March 1820, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 22.

87 Secretary to Government to Resident, 22 April 1820, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 25. King of Oudh to Governor General, 28 July 1820, BPC 12 August 1820, no. 19.

88 Resident to Secretary to Government 22 October 1827, BPC 2 November 1827, no. 19. Secretary to Government to Resident, 2 November 1827, BPC 2 November 1827, no. 41.

89 Resident to Political Secretary to Government of India, 18 May 1842, India Political Consultations 15 June 1847, no. 37, Commonwealth Relations Office, London.

90 Resident to Governor General, 20 October 1827, BPC 16 November 1827, no. 15. al-Ghanī, Najm, p. 146.Google Scholar

91 King of Oudh to Resident, 30 June 1825, BPC 14 October 1825, no. 13.

92 Resident to King of Oudh, 26 May 1825, BPC 14 October 1825, no. 12.

93 King of Oudh to Resident, 30 June 1825, BPC 10 October 1825, no. 13.

94 Resident to Secretary to Government, 6 May 1820, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 23.

95 King of Oudh to Governor General, 29 May 1820, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 22.

96 Spry, H. H., Modern India with Illustrations of the Resources and Capabilities of Hindustan, 2 vols (London: Whittaker, 1837), 1:228.Google Scholar Resident to Governor General, 19 May 1929, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 24. Further, Ghāzī al-Dīn Haydar specified an entirely new set of Persian terms and forms of address to be substituted for those hitherto current in correspondence between himself and the Company. Resident to Persian Secretary to Government, 17 July 1820, BPC 12 August 1820, no. 18.

97 Resident to Secretary to Government, 19 May 1820, BPC 22 April 1820, no. 24.

98 Resident to Secretary to Government, 26 August 1823, BPC 12 September 1823, no. 21.

99 Bose, A. C., Hazrat Wajid Ali Shah, King of Oudh (n.p.: A. C. Bose, n.d.), p. 30.Google ScholarHaydar, Kamāl al-Dīn, Qaysar al-Tawārīkh, 2 vols (Lucknow: Nevil Kishore, 1879), 2:223–5.Google Scholar

100 T. D Forsyth, Secretary of Chief Commissioner, Lucknow, circular of 7 January 1859, no. 1/2- of 1859, U.P. State Archives, Lucknow, Board of Revenue, General, file 2273. S. Martin, Deputy Commissioner, Lucknow, letter no. 189 of 1858, quoted in Burn, Richard, ‘The Machlidar Subah Awadh Coins,’ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 32, numismatic supplement (1922): 1–2n.Google Scholar