Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:22:15.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Malthus and the Theory of ‘Unequal Powers’: Population and Food Production in India, 1800–1947

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Simon Commander
Simon Commander
Affiliation:
Overseas Development Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The spectre of a ‘Malthusian’ catastrophe engulfing the subcontinent commands less attention currently than in relatively recent times. This is largely attributable to the greater sense of confidence in the food-grain supply capacity of Indian agriculture in the wake of the Green Revolution. From the mid-1960s through to 1980, output has maintained a growth rate in excess of 2.5% p.a., with yield increments rather than area increments accounting for the major part. Since 1950, per capita net availability of foodgrains has increased by over 20%, while the real price of foodgrains has shown a steady downward trend since 1968. Current projections suggest that self-sufficiency in food production can be sustained through to the end of the century. Yet this remains partly contingent on climatic factors and a slackening trend of population growth. However, population growth rates currently exceed 2.2% p.a. and the relative stability of fertility rates means that a diminution is by no means assured. While supply shortfalls could be met through increased imports of food commodities, the possible emergence of India in the longer term as a food deficitary economy could have serious implications for the international grain market, given the current structure of supply for foodgrains and the growing dependence, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, on food imports.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 661 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I would like to thank Chris Bayly, Neil Charlesworth, Gilbert Etienne, Jayati Ghosh and Tony Wrigley for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

1 Harrison, J. et al. , India: Demand and Supply Prospects for Agriculture. World Bank Staffing Paper 500 (Washington, 1981).Google Scholar

2 Srinivasan, T. N. and Bardhan, P. K. (eds), Poverty and Income Distribution in India (Calcutta, 1974)Google Scholar; Ahluwalia, M. S., ‘Rural Poverty and Agricultural Performance in India’, Journal of Development Studies (1978), pp. 298–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Calculated from, Harrison, op.cit; Blyn, G., Agricultural Trends in India, 1891–1347: Output, Availability and Productivity (Philadelphia, 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heston, A., ‘National Income’, in Kumar, D. (ed.), Cambridge Economic History of India, Volume 2, 1757–1970 (Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar; Report of the Indian Famine Commission, Part 1 (Calcutta, 1880), p. 68.Google Scholar

4 Malthus, T. R., An Essay on Population (2 vols), Book I Chapter 11 (Everyman Edition, London, 1961).Google Scholar

5 Ambirajan, S., ‘Political Economy and Indian Famines’, South Asia, 1 (1971), pp. 20–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Classical Political Economy and British Policy in India (Cambridge, 1978).Google Scholar

6 Hunter, W. W., The India of the Queen and Other Essays (London, 1903), p. 147.Google Scholar

7 Greenough, P., Prosperity and Misery in Modern Bengal. The Famine of 1943–44 (New York, 1982), p. 62.Google Scholar

8 Sen, A. K., Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar

9 Malthus, T. R., Principles of Political Economy Considered with a View to their Practical Application (London, 1820).Google Scholar

10 Malthus, , 1820, p. 351.Google Scholar

11 Malthus, , 1961, 1, p. 10.Google Scholar

12 Ricardo, D., Notes on Malthus' Principles of Political Economy, vol. 2, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Sraffa, Piero (Cambridge, 1951), pp. 108–9.Google Scholar

13 Malthus, , 1820, p. 353.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 413.

15 In later editions of the Essay, preventive checks, principally moral restraint, were accorded greater significance.

16 Malthus, , 1820, pp. 38–9.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., pp. 293ff.

18 Ibid., p. 300.

19 Ibid., pp. 301ff.

20 Ibid., pp. 313–14.

21 Ibid., pp. 380ff.

22 Sowell, T., Classical Economics Reconsidered (Princeton, 1974), p. 91.Google Scholar

23 Ricardo, , 1951, pp. 303ff.Google Scholar

24 malthus, , 1820, p. 353.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., p. 294.

26 Ibid., p. 335.

27 Ibid., pp. 352–3.

28 Keynes, J. M., The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London, 1936).Google Scholar

29 Eltis, W. A., The Classical Theory of Economic Growth (London, 1984), p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Dobb, M., Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith (Cambridge, 1973), p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Ladurie, E. Le Roy, Les paysans de Languedoc (Paris, 1966), vol. 1, p. 654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Malthus, , 1961, 1, p. 119.Google Scholar

33 Greenough, , 1982, Appendix A.Google Scholar

34 , D. and Visaria, P., ‘Population, 1757–1947’, in Kumar, 1983, pp. 463–532.Google Scholar

35 Cassen, R. H., India: Population, Economy and Society (London, 1978), pp. 146ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Bernier, François, Travels in the Mughal Empire, 1656–1669 (Delhi, 1972).Google Scholar

37 O'Brien, P. K., ‘Agriculture and the Industrial Revolution’, Economic History Review, Second Series, 30, 1 (1977), p. 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

38 Morris, M. D., ‘The Population of All-India, 1800–1951’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 11 (1974), pp. 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Postan, M. M., The Medieval Economy and Society (London, 1975)Google Scholar; Bois, Guy, Crise du féodalisme (Paris, 1976).Google Scholar

40 Commander, Simon, ‘The Agrarian Economy of Northern India, 1800–1900.’ Cambridge Ph.D, 1980, pp. 58ff.Google Scholar

41 Moens, S. M, Report on the Settlement of Bareilly District (1874), p. 50Google Scholar; Fremantle, S. H., Final Report on Settlement of Bareilly (Allahabad, 1903), p. 8.Google Scholar

42 Calvert, H., Wealth and Welfare of the Punjab (Lahore, 1936)Google Scholar; Darling, M., The Punjab Peasantry in Prosperity and Debt (Reprinted, Delhi, 1977).Google Scholar

43 Blyn, G., 1966, pp. 321–2.Google Scholar

44 Census of India, 1931, vol. XVII, Punjab (Lahore, 1933), p. 15.Google Scholar

45 Guha, Sumit, ‘The Agrarian Economy of the Bombay Deccan 1818–1941’. Cambridge Ph.D. 1981, p. 244.Google Scholar

46 Kumar, Dharma, Land and Caste in South India (Cambridge, 1965), pp. 105–6.Google Scholar

47 Cited in Bagchi, A. K., ‘De-industrialization in Gangetic Bihar 1809–1901’, in De, Barun (ed.), Essays in Honour of S. C. Sarkar (Delhi, 1976), p. 511.Google Scholar

48 Sources for Table 3: Martin, R. M., History of the Colonies of the British Empire (London, 1943), pp. 288–9Google Scholar; Hunter, W. W., A Statistical Account of Bengal (London, 1875–1879), 20 volsGoogle Scholar; idem, Annals of Rural Bengal (London, 1897), p. 34Google Scholar; ‘Return of the Area and Population of India’, Parliamentary Papers, 1857, Sess.2, vol. XXIX, pp. 86–7Google Scholar; Hutton, J. H., Census of India, 1931, vol. 1, pt 2 (Delhi, 1933)Google Scholar; Census of India, General Tables, 1941 (Delhi, 1943), pp. 118–26.Google Scholar

49 Klein, Ira, ‘Malaria and Mortality in Bengal 1840–1921’, IESHR, 9, 2 (1972)Google Scholar; Islam, M. M., Bengal Agriculture 1920–1946 (Cambridge, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also, Baker's, C. J.Review of Islam's book, Modern Asian Studies, 14, (1980), pp. 513–18.Google Scholar

50 Krishnamurthy, J., ‘The Occupational structure’, in Kumar, 1983, pp. 534/5.Google Scholar

51 Visaria, , 1983, pp. 517–21; Cassen, 1978.Google Scholar

52 Hamilton, W., The East India Gazetteer (London, 1815), p. 164Google Scholar; Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series, Bombay Presidency, vol. 1 (Bombay, 1909)Google Scholar; Census of India, 1951, vol.4: 1 (Bombay, 1953)Google Scholar; Gazetteer of Bombay City and Island by Edwardes, S. M. (Bombay, 1909), vol. 1, pp. 150ff.Google Scholar

53 Mehta, S. D., The Cotton Mills of India 1854–1954 (Bombay, 1954)Google Scholar; Morris, M. D., The Emergence of an Industrial Labour Force in India: A Study of the Bombay Cotton Mills 1854–1947 (Berkeley, 1965), Appendix 1.Google Scholar

54 District Gazetteer of Bengal, vol. 19, 1901–1902 (Calcutta, 1905)Google Scholar; Census of India, 1951, vol. 6:3 (Delhi, 1953).Google Scholar

55 Montgomery, R., Statistical Report of the District of Cawnpore (Agra, 1849), Appendix XXVIIGoogle Scholar; Bayly, C., ‘Town Building in North India 1790–1830’, Modern Asian Studies, 9, 4 (1975), p. 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Census of India, 1951, Uttar Pradesh, General Tables (Delhi, 1953).Google Scholar

56 Hamilton, , 1815, p. 164Google Scholar; Census of India, 1951, Madras (Delhi, 1953).Google Scholar

57 Bayly, C. A., Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars. North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion, 1770–1870 (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar

58 Davis, , 1951.Google Scholar

59 Zachariah, K. C., Internal Migration in the Indian Sub-Continent 1901–1931 (London, 1964).Google Scholar

60 Census of India, 1881, vol. 1, General Report.

61 Cassen, , 1978, p. 117.Google Scholar

62 Visaria, , 1983, p. 572Google Scholar; Gupta, P. Das, ‘Estimation of Demographic Measures for India, 1881–1961’, Population Studies, vol. 25, no. 3 (1971), pp. 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

63 See, inter alia, Agarwala, S. N., ‘The Age of Marriage in India’, Population Index, 23, 2 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Census of India, 1971, Female Age at Marriage, Ministry of Home Affairs (Delhi, 1977); Census of India, 1901, vol. 1, Report by Risley, H. H. and Gait, E. A. (Calcutta, 1903)Google Scholar; Jairath, V. K., ‘Production Relations and Population’, in, Hawthorn, G. (ed.), Population and Development (London, 1979), pp. 172–3Google Scholar; Cassen, , 1978, pp. 52–4.Google Scholar

64 Wrigley, E. A. and Schofield, R. S., The Population History of England 1541–1871 (London, 1981), pp. 421ff, 459.Google Scholar

65 Census of India, 1971.

66 Female Infanticide among Rajput Tribes of Zillah Agra—Selections from Records of Government, NWP, vol. 3, 1855; Ibbetson, Denzil, Punjab Castes (Lahore, 1916).Google Scholar

67 Metcalf, T. R., Land, Landlords and the British Raj (Berkeley, 1979)Google Scholar; Washbrook, D. A., The Emergence of Provincial Politics—The Madras Presidency 1870–1920 (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 97ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Commander, 1980, ch. 2.

69 Blyn, , 1966, pp. 93ff.Google Scholar

70 Heston, , 1983, p. 410–11.Google Scholar The ‘revisionist’ literature further consists of: Heston, A., ‘Official Yields per Acre in India’, IESHR, 10 (1973), and 15 (1978)Google Scholar; Clive Dewey, Patwari and Chaukidar: Subordinate Officials and the Reliability of India's Agricultural Statistics’, in Dewey, C. and Hopkins, S. G. (eds), The Imperial Impact (London, 1978), ch. 17Google Scholar; M. M. Islam, 1979. Their conclusions have been counter-criticized by, amongst others, Saith, A., ‘Agrarian Structure, Technology and Marketed Surplus’. Cambridge Ph.D, 1978, pp. 342–61.Google ScholarMishra, S., ‘Patterns of Long-Run Agrarian Change in Bombay and Punjab 1881–1972’. Cambridge PhD, 1981Google Scholar; Baker, C. J., 1980; Commander, 1980, p. 110ffGoogle Scholar; Desai, Ashok, ‘Revenue Administration and Agricultural Statistics in Bombay Presidency’, IESHR, vol. XV (1978), pp. 173–86.Google Scholar

71 Blyn, , 1963, pp. 150ff.Google Scholar

72 For example, Moreland, W. H., The Agriculture of the United Provinces (Allahabad, 1912).Google Scholar

73 Agriculture Statistics of British India.

74 Commander, , 1980, pp. 11ffGoogle Scholar; Saith, A., 1978, pp. 342–61.Google Scholar

75 Mishra, Satish, ‘Commercialisation, Peasant Differentiation and Merchant Capital in Late Nineteenth-Century Bombay and Punjab’. Journal of Peasant Studies, 10, 1 (1982), pp. 3–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76 Index Numbers of Indian Prices, 1861–1931 (Delhi, 1933)Google Scholar; McAlpin, M., Price Movements and Fluctuations in Economic Activity, 1860–1947, in Kumar, D. (ed.), 1983, P 894Google Scholar: For pre-1860 prices, see Commander, 1980, ch. 3; Narain, Brij, 80 Years of Punjab Food Prices, 1841–1920, Lahore, Board of Economic Inquiry (Punjab, 1926).Google Scholar

77 Chaturvedi, S. C., Rural and Urban Wages in UP (Lucknow, 1956)Google Scholar; Datta, K. L., Report of the Enquiry into the Rise of Prices in India (Allahabad, 1915), vol. 3, pp. 202–3Google Scholar; O'Conor, J. E, Prices and Wages in India (Calcutta, 1886).Google Scholar

78 Kessinger, T. G., Vilyatpur 1848–1968: Social and Economic Change in a North Indian Village (Berkeley, 1974)Google Scholar; Charlesworth, N., ‘Agrarian Society and British Administration in Western India, 1847–1920’. Cambridge Ph.D, 1974Google Scholar; Prasad, Tiryugi, The Organization of the Wheat Trade in the North West of the United Provinces (Allahabad, 1932)Google Scholar; Washbrook, , 1976, pp. 64ffGoogle Scholar; Kumar, Ravindar, ‘The Rise of the Rich Peasant in Western India’, in Low, D. A. (ed.), Soundings in Modern South Asian History (London, 1968), pp. 25ff.Google Scholar

79 Vilar, Pierre, ‘Réflexions sur la crise de l'ancient type’, in Conjoncture économique, structures sociales. Hommage à Ernest Labrousse. (La Haye, 1974), p. 38.Google Scholar

80 McAlpin, M. B., Subject to Famine. Food Crises and Economic Change in Western India, 1860–1920 (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar

81 Hill, S. A., Report on the Rainfall of the N.W.P, (Allahabad, 1879)Google Scholar; Buckley, R. B., The Irrigation Works of India (London, 1906), p. 15Google Scholar; District Gazetteer of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, Cawnpore, vol. 19 (Allahabad, 1909), p. 22.Google Scholar

82 More detailed treatment of these issues is in Commander, 1980, chs 5 and 6.

83 Wright, A., Agra to M. Moore, Secretary to Board of Revenue, 10 December 1812 to 15 January 1813. B.R.C.C. Range 91, vol. 32.Google Scholar

84 Lindsay, C., ‘Account of the Famine of 1837/38 in Farrukhabad District’, NWP Judicial and Revenue Department Delhi Division, Home Misc. India Office, vol. 487; ‘Relief Measures in the NWP’, Indian Agriculturist, 1 November 1877, vol. 2, p. 341;Google Scholar‘The Operation of the Laisser-Fairc Principle in Times of Scarcity’, Calcutta Review, 46 (1867), pp. 102ffGoogle Scholar; Ryley, J., Magistrate, Kanpur, to Board of Revenue (10 December 1812), 10 July 1813, Board of Revenue, Ceded and Conquered, India Office, Range 92, vol. 16.Google Scholar

85 Guha, , 1981, pp. 270ffGoogle Scholar; Auckland to Court of Directors, Meerut Camp, 13 February, 1838. N. A. I. Home Misc. vol. 487, 1838/39.

86 Dupaquier, J., ‘De l'animal à l'homme: le mécanisme autorégulateur des populations traditionelles’, Revue de l'Institut de Sociologie, 2 (1972)Google Scholar; Deronet, B., Clés pour un systè;me auto-régulateur des populations rurales d'Ancien Régime, Annales E.S.C., 1, (1980), pp. 3–41.Google Scholar

87 Report on Census of India, vol. 1, (1881), p. 124.Google Scholar

88 Girdlestone, C. E. R., Report on Past Famines in the N.W.P. (Allahabad, 1868).Google Scholar

89 Smith, R. Baird, Report on the Famine of 1860/1 (Allahabad, 1861).Google Scholar

90 Report of the Plague Commission, Parliamentary Papers, 1902, vol. LXXII.Google Scholar

91 Calculated from Census of India, General Reports, 1901, 1911, 1921, 1931 and 1941, Punjab, vol. XVII, p. 16.Google Scholar

92 Report on the Administration of the U.P. of Agra and Oudh, 1918/19 (Allahabad, 1920).

93 Biraben, J. N., Les hommes et la peste en France et dans les pays européens el méditerraneens, vol. 1, (Paris, 1971), Postan, 1975, p. 30.Google ScholarShrewsbury, J. F. D., A History of Bubonic Plague in the British Isles (Cambridge, 1970), pp. 54ff.Google Scholar

94 Klein, Ira, ‘Death in India 1871–1921’. Journal of Asian Studies, vol. XXXII, 4 (08 1973), pp. 653–7.Google Scholar

95 A Sanitary Report on Certain Districts in the Meerut Division by Cutcliffe, H. C. (Allahabad, 1868), pp. 37–8Google Scholar; Report on Effect of Canals on Mortuary Rate by Planck, C., 14 October 1879Google Scholar, NWP Irrigation Proceedings, March 1881, no. 22. See also, Whitcombe, Elizabeth, Agrarian Conditions in Northern India, vol. 1, The United Provinces under British Rule 1860–1900 (California, 1972).Google Scholar

96 Papers regarding Village Sanitation in India 1888–1895, Selections from Records of Government in India, Home Department, no. CCCXXXVII; Report on the Treatment of Epidemic Cholera, by Murray, J. (Agra, 1869), pp. 8–10Google Scholar; Davis, , 1951.Google Scholar

97 Sen, A. K., ‘Food Entitlement and Food Aid Programmes’, in, Report of the World Food Programme Seminar on Food Aid (Rome, 1984), pp. 111–22.Google Scholar

98 Department of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics, Government of India, Review of Trade, 1880 onwards, annual numbers.

99 Ray, R., Industrialization in India: Growth and Conflict in the Private Corporate Sector, 1914–1927 (Delhi, 1979).Google Scholar