Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T19:50:41.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models of Peasant Differentiation and Aspects of Agrarian Economy in Colonial India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Shri Prakash
Shri Prakash
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Given their sheer numbers, it is hardly surprising that the fate of peasants during British Rule in India should have become a principal index for evaluating its successes and failures. Since the Raj was much more than another effete political superimposition on supposedly timeless villages, the question of agrarian growth or stagnation during its currency is intertwined with more general issues. In so far as colonialism meant a sizable expansion of trade to and from the rural areas, its impact on village social structure in India bears comparison with that of a modern market on peasantries in other parts of the world. Perhaps, the classic case of a peasantry coming face to face with a growing market happened in Russia between 1860 and 1930. The history of that period has generated conceptual discussion about the dynamics of peasant society. The possibility of some of those ideas shedding light on the situation in India has prompted Indo-Russian contrasts and comparisons in agrarian history on more than one occasion (Charlesworth: 1979; Stein: 1984). As a sequel to these writings the Russian debate is considered here briefly in order to suggest some ways in which it might be useful in the Indian context.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1985 , pp. 549 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, F. G. H., The Land Revenue Rules in Bombay Presidency (Bombay, 1921).Google Scholar
Arizpe, L., ‘Relay Migration’, in Towards a Political Economy of Urbanization in the Third World, edited by Safa, H. I. (O.U.P., Delhi, 1982).Google Scholar
Baker, C. J., The Politics of South India, 1920–1937 (Cambridge, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. J., The Economy of South India (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
Bayly, C. A., Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Breman, J., Patronage and Exploitation (Berkeley, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G.Modern India, A Sketch of the System of Civil Government (London, 1852).Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N., ‘The Russian Stratification Debate and India’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 13, no. 1 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, N., ‘Rich Peasants and Poor Peasants in late Nineteenth Century Maharashtra’, Dewey, C. and Hopkins, A. G. (eds), The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Charlesworth, N., ‘The “Middle Peasant Thesis” and the Roots of Rural Agitation in India, 1914–1947’, Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 7, no. 3 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, N., The Origins of Fragmentation of Landholdings in British India: A Comparative Examination. Robb, Peter (ed.), Rural India (London, 1983).Google Scholar
Chayanov, A. V., The Theory of Peasant Economy, transl. and ed. Thorner, D., Smith, R. E. F. and Kerblay, B. (Homewood, III., 1966).Google Scholar
Epstein, T. S., Economic Development and Social Change in South India (Manchester, 1962).Google Scholar
Farmer, B. H., Agricultural Colonization in India since Independence (Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
Fox, R. G., Kin, Clan, Raja and Rule, State-Hinterland Relations in Pre-industrial India (California, 1971).Google Scholar
Galeski, B., Basic Concepts of Rural Sociology (Manchester, 1972).Google Scholar
Goody, J., Thirsk, J. and Thompson, E. P., Family and Inheritance, Rural Society in Western Europe 1200–1800 (Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar
Hardiman, D., ‘The Roots of Rural Agitation in India, 1914–1947: A Rejoinder to Charlesworth’. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 8. no. 3 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M., ‘Chayanov and the Economics of the Russian Peasantry’, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 2, no. 4 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M., ‘Resource Allocation and Agrarian Class Formation: The Problem of Social Mobility among Russian Peasant Households, 1880–1930’, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 4, no. 2 (1978).Google Scholar
Hussain, A. and Tribe, K., Marxism and the Agrarian Question (London, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautsky, K., ‘The Agrarian Question’, transl. J. Banaji, Economy and Society, vol. V (1976).Google Scholar
Keatinge, G., Agricultural Progress in Western India (London, 1921).Google Scholar
Kessinger, T., Vilyatpur (Berkeley, 1974).Google Scholar
Kumar, D., ‘Landownership and Equality in Madras Presidency, 1853–54 to 1946–47’, The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. XII, no. 3 (1975).Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Western India in the Nineteenth Century (Canberra, 1968).Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I., The Development of Capitalism in Russia (Moscow, 1956).Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I., Theory of the Agrarian Question, Selected Works, Vol. XII (Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1938).Google Scholar
Lerner, S., ‘Fertility Patterns in Rural Mexico: Critical Comments on Some Findings’, Proceedings of the Conference on Economic and Demographic Change (Helsinki, 1978).Google Scholar
Lesthaege, R., ‘Oscillating Fertility: Amplifying and Dampening Mechanisms’, Proceedings of the Conference on Economic and Demographic Change (Helsinki, 1978).Google Scholar
Low, D. A., Congress and the Raj (London, 1977).Google Scholar
McGee, T., ‘Circulatory Migration in S.E. Asia’, in Towards a Political Economy of Urbanization in the Third World, ed. by Safa, H. I. (O.U.P. Delhi, 1982).Google Scholar
Mukhtyar, G. E., Life and Labour in a South Gujarat Village (Calcutta, 1930).Google Scholar
Patnaik, U., ‘Class Differentiation within the Peasantry, An Approach to an Analysis of Indian Agriculture’, Economic and Political Weekly (25 09 1976).Google Scholar
Patnaik, U., ‘Neo-Populism and Marxism: The Chayanovian View of the Agrarian Question and its Fundamental Fallacy’. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 6, no. 4 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, D., Kanbi and Patidar: A Study of the Patidar Community of Gujarat (Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
Prakash, S., ‘The Evolution of Agrarian Economy in Gujarat, India, 1850–1930’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, 02, 1984, unpublished.Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Report on the General Administration of the Bombay Presidency 1911/12, Official Publications Room (OPR), Cambridge University Library (CUL).Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Report of the Bombay Banking Enquiry Committee, 1930, OPR—CUL.Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Report on the First Revision Settlement of the Jambusar Taluka of the Broach District (Bombay 1903), OPR—CUL.Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Report on the First Revision Settlement of the Broach Taluka of the Broach District (Bombay 1902), OPR—CUL.Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Report on the Cost of Production of Crops in the Principal Sugar Cane and Cotton Tracts in India (Madras, 1940).Google Scholar
Shanin, T., The Awkward Class (1972).Google Scholar
Shukla, J. B., Life and Labour in a Gujarat taluka (Calcutta, 1937).Google Scholar
Stein, B., Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India (Oxford and Delhi, 1980).Google Scholar
Stein, B., ‘Kulaks and Capitalism: Indo-Russian Comparisons considered,’ Postgraduate Seminar, Institute of Commonwealth Studies (London, 02 1984).Google Scholar
Stokes, E. T., The Peasant and the Raj (Cambridge, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tada, H., ‘Disintegration of the Peasantry in India; Some Issues’, The Developing Economies, vol. XII, no. 1 (1975).Google Scholar
Washbrook, D. A., The Emergence of Provincial Politics, The Madras Presidency (Cambridge, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
N.B. For references to Raychaudhury, Tapan, Chaudhuri, B. B. and Fukazawa, H., see Cambridge Economic History of India, vol. II (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar