1 Ábalos, Iñaki, The Good Life (Barcelona, 2001)Google Scholar; Ardao, Arturo, “Assimilation and Transformation of Positivism in Latin America,” Journal of the History of Ideas 24/4 (1963), 515–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woll, Allen L., “Positivism and History in Nineteenth-Century Chile,” Journal of the History of Ideas 37/3 (1976), 493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lee Woodward, Ralph, ed., Positivism in Latin America, 1850–1900 (Lexington, 1971)Google Scholar; Zea, Leopoldo, Positivism in Mexico (Austin, 1974)Google Scholar.

2 See, for instance, Paul Mumford, Eric, The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928–1960 (Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar.

3 Ábalos, The Good Life, at 69.

4 See, for instance, Ludlow, J. M., “No. VII. Two Lay Dialogues,” in Tracts for Priests and People (London, 1861), 50Google Scholar; Henry Huxley, Thomas, Lay Sermons (London, 1870), 88, 153–91Google Scholar; Stuart Mill, John, The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte (New York, 1887)Google Scholar.

5 Pickering, Mary, Auguste Comte, vol. 3 (Cambridge, 2009), 10Google Scholar; Dixon, Thomas, The Invention of Altruism (Oxford, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wright, T. R., The Religion of Humanity (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar; Calabria, Michael D. and Macrae, Janet A., eds., Suggestions for Thought by Florence Nightingale (Philadelphia, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. None of these figures came close to becoming “complete” and steadfast adherents of organized positivism.

6 Wright, The Religion of Humanity, 66, 110, 219, 255.

7 Capon, David Smith, Architectural Theory, 2 vols. (New York, 1999), 2: 285–6Google Scholar, 1: 140.

8 Haac, Oscar A., ed., The Correspondence of John Stuart Mill and Auguste Comte (Oxon., 1995), 5Google Scholar; Pease, Edward R., The History of the Fabian Society (New York, 1916), 18Google Scholar.

9 Vernon, Richard, “Auguste Comte and the Withering-Away of the State,” Journal of the History of Ideas 45/4 (1984), 549–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, The Communist Manifesto (London, 2002)Google Scholar; Comte, Auguste, Appel aux conservateurs (Paris, 1855)Google Scholar.

11 Alengry, Franck, Essai historique et critique sur la sociologie chez Auguste Comte (Paris, 1900), 261Google Scholar.

12 The modernist period in architecture and urbanism typically dates between the 1890s and the 1970s.

13 Wigley, Mark, “Whatever Happened to Total Design?”, Harvard Design Magazine 5 (1998), 1–8Google Scholar.

14 Harrison, Frederic, The Philosophy of Common Sense (London, 1907), 44–5Google Scholar; Harrison, National Social Problems (London, 1908), 428.

15 The religion is the best-documented aspect of the movement. See Harrison, Frederic, “The Religion of Humanity,” Positivist Review 234 (1912), 120–30Google Scholar; Munro, Dr and Carey Hall, J., “Rationalists and the Religion of Humanity,” Positivist Review 236 (1912), 184–7Google Scholar; Bryson, Gladys, “Early English Positivists and the Religion of Humanity,” American Sociological Review 1/3 (1936), 343–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Billington, James H., “The Intelligentsia and the Religion of Humanity,” American Historical Review 65/4 (1960), 807–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wright, T. R., “George Eliot and the Religion of Humanity” (unpublished D.Phil., University of Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar; Vogeler, Martha S., “Frederic Harrison and the Religion of Humanity,” Ethical Record 83/10 (1978), 3–6Google Scholar; Wernick, Andrew, Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity (Cambridge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Raeder, Linda C., John Stuart Mill and the Religion of Humanity (Columbia, 2002)Google Scholar; Gould, F. J., “Positivism as a Religion of Hope,” Positivist Review 280 (1916), 76–83Google Scholar; McGee, John Edwin, A Crusade for Humanity (London, 1931)Google Scholar; Style, Jane M., Auguste Comte, Thinker and Lover (London, 1928)Google Scholar; Paula Lopes, R., Auguste Comte (Paris, 1946)Google Scholar; Sylvester Smith, Warren, London Heretics (London, 1967)Google Scholar.

16 Auguste Comte, System of Positive Polity, 4 vols. (London, 1875–7), 1: 123–4; Gouhier, Henri, La jeunesse d'Auguste Comte et la formation dur positivisme, 3 vols. (Paris, 1970), 2: 58–61Google Scholar, 3: 407. Comte called the “true principle of republicanism” a state where “all forces . . . work together for the common good.” The proclamation of a republic, he maintained, meant that each citizen devotes “all his faculties” to “the public welfare.” He aimed to achieve this mode of republicanism chiefly through the cultural celebrations of the Religion of Humanity. Henri Gouiher argues that the Religion of Humanity was based on the secular religions of the French Revolution, which aimed to establish a new republican culture.

17 The “Occidental Republic” is referred to as the “Republic of the West” in English translations of Comte's Système de politique positive, a work that that I will refer to as System. The first volume of System was published as A General View of Positivism in 1848.

18 Comte, System, 4: 7; Bell, Duncan, “Marking and Taking Worlds,” in Moyn, Samuel and Sartori, Andrew, eds., Global Intellectual History (New York, 2009), 254–79Google Scholar. Comte wrote, “When succeeding generations come to need more detailed rules, they will draw them from moral science,” the Religion of Humanity, “by the aid of an advance in sociological science.”

19 Wright, Julian, The Regionalist Movement in France, 1890–1914 (Oxford, 2003), 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rowe, Colin and Koetter, Fred, Collage City (Cambridge, 1983), 21Google Scholar. Also see Feichtinger, Johannes, Fillafer, Franz L., and Surman, Jan, eds. The Worlds of Positivism (Cham, 2018), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Welter, Volker M., Biopolis (Cambridge, 2002)Google Scholar; Meller, Helen, Patrick Geddes (London, 1990)Google Scholar; Hysler-Rubin, Noah, Patrick Geddes and Town Planning (London, 2011)Google Scholar.

20 Hall, Peter, Cities of Tomorrow (Oxford, 1988), 3Google Scholar. Indeed, Geddes held links to anarchists, like other positivists, who considered Kropotkin's works a valuable introduction to Comte's utopian thinking. See Alice Bridges, Mary, Recollections of John Henry Bridges (privately published, 1908) 256Google Scholar; Prince Kropotkin, Ethics, trans. Louis S. Friedland and Joseph R. Piroshnikoff (New York, 1924), 249–51; Belfort Bax, Ernest, A Handbook of the History of Philosophy (London, 1886), 368Google Scholar.

21 Soja, Edward W., Postmetropolis (London, 2000)Google Scholar, 67, 75.

22 Osborn, F. J., Green-Belt Cities (London, 1946), 39Google Scholar; Keele University, Le Play House Papers (KU-LP/11/8/7), ff. 186–207. Geddes warned in 1907 that speculative builders and architects could bastardize the garden city idea worldwide by promoting their work as a “garden city” without it having been set out on a sociological foundation. Osborn seemed to be confirming that this had become the state of play in 1946.

23 Buder, Stanley, Visionaries and Planners (Oxford, 1990)Google Scholar, 33, 170; Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies, Ebenezer Howard Papers, DE/Ho/F3/10, ff. 11–12. Spiller, Gustav, The Ethical Movement in Great Britain (London, 1934)Google Scholar 164. Howard expressed his keenness for positivism at the Letchworth ethical society.

24 Sylva Domhardt, Konstanze, “The Garden City Idea in the CIAM Discourse on Urbanism,” Planning Perspectives 27/2 (2012), 173–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Giedion, Sigfried, Space, Time and Architecture (Cambridge, 2002), 233Google Scholar.

26 Weaver, Clyde, Regional Development and the Local Community (New York, 1984)Google Scholar, 31.

27 Scott, John and Bromley, Ray, Envisioning Sociology (Albany, 2013), 90–1Google Scholar.

28 Jencks, Charles, Modern Movements in Architecture (London, 1985)Google Scholar; Banham, Reyner, Theory and Design in the First Machine Age (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Conrads, Ulrich, ed., Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture (Cambridge, 1971)Google Scholar. Refer to Jencks's “evolutionary tree” of the “modern movements.”

29 Saint-Simon proposed a Panamanian link between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and to connect Madrid to the Guadalquivir river and the Atlantic Ocean.

30 Rykwert, Joseph, The Seduction of Place (Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar, 62.

31 Claude Henri de Saint-Simon, Oeuvres, vol. 1 (Paris, 1868), 53, 210–4; Comte, System, 4: 500–2, General Appendix, ii; de Saint-Simon, Claude Henri, Catéchisme des industriels (Paris, 1823)Google Scholar, 59; Saint-Simon, Du système industriel (Paris, 1821), iii–x, 22–62; Saint-Simon, Du système industriel, 2e partie (Paris, 1821), 8–10.

32 Durkheim, Émile, Socialism (New York, 1962)Google Scholar, 134; Claude Henri de Saint-Simon, Oeuvres, vol. 4 (Paris, 1868), 11–96.

33 Auguste Comte, Cours de philsophie positive, vol. 4 (Paris, 1839), 294.

34 The sequence of the classification, from simplest to complex natural sciences, is astronomy and mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology.

35 Turner, Frank M., European Intellectual History from Rousseau to Nietzsche (London, 2014)Google Scholar, 94.

36 de Saint-Simon, Claude Henri, New Christianity (London, 1834)Google Scholar, 7.

37 Comte, System, 3: 523; Higginson, C. G., “The Incorporation of the Proletariate into Modern Society,” Positivist Review 51 (1897), 68–72Google Scholar; Branford, Victor, Outlines of the Sociology of London (London, 1908)Google Scholar, 14.

38 Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, The Communist Manifesto, ed. Stedman Jones, Gareth (London, 2002)Google Scholar.

39 Marx, Karl, Early Writings (London, 1992), 348Google Scholar.

40 Auguste Comte, Correspondance inédite d'Auguste Comte, vol. 3 (Paris, 1904), 326–8; Edger, Henry and Metcalf, M. John, Lettres d'Auguste Comte à Henry Edger et à M. John Metcalf (Paris, 1889), 13–14Google Scholar; Wunderlich, Roger, Low Living and High Thinking at Modern Times, New York (Syracuse, 1992), 164–71Google Scholar; Harp, Gillis J., Positivist Republic (University Park, 1995), 23–30Google Scholar. The activities here ultimately would include festivals, lectures, lessons in the arts, craft guild training, and women's clubs. The societies would serve as social investigation centres for regional place-making, in which the positivists fleshed out programs and manifestos for social reorganization that were imbued with Comte's utopian principles.

41 Collingham, H. A. C., The July Monarchy (London, 1988), 67–8Google Scholar, 345–75.

42 Comte, System, 4: 267.

43 Comte, System, 1: 123–4.

44 Branford, Victor and Geddes, Patrick, Our Social Inheritance (London, 1919), 35–7Google Scholar.

45 Pocock, J. G. A., Virtue, Commerce, and History (Cambridge, 2002), 42Google Scholar. Comte, Auguste, Catechism of Positive Religion (London, 1858), 349Google Scholar; Pickering, Mary, Auguste Comte, 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1993–2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 2: 10. Scholars of republicanism note that the public thing, the “res publica or the polis,” operated according to a functional mode of partecipazione where “public authority” was a matter of “public right.” The life of the zoon politikon involved “participation, equality, and ruling and being ruled in turn.” The global confederation of republics or city-states would be linked through the “spiritual” power of intellectuals, as a “sociocracy,” or rule by sociology. Comte's biographer, Mary Pickering, has demonstrated that the philosopher was a misogynist, but aspects of his work attempted obscure his views. He suggested that mothers should occupy the “first rank in [the] Sociocracy” of his eutopia. The mother's role as “Priestess of Humanity,” alongside the elders of the home, “is to breathe into [men and children] the dispositions most in harmony with their public duties”; husband and children would act as the mother's “theoretical and practical servants.”

46 Bevir, Mark, The Making of British Socialism (Princeton, 2011)Google Scholar, 17; Pocock, J. G. A., Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1975)Google Scholar; Pocock, Three British Revolutions (Princeton, 1980); Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History; Harrison, Royden, Before the Socialists (London, 1965)Google Scholar, 3–4, 210–339; Porter, Bernard, Critics of Empire (London, 1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar); Harris, Jose, “Epilogue: French Revolution to Fin de Siècle: Political Thought in Retrospect and Prospect, 1800–1914,” in Stedman Jones, Gareth and Claeys, Gregory, eds., The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Political Thought (Cambridge, 2010), 893–933, at 896Google Scholar. Tracing the discourse of “civic virtue” set out by J. G. A. Pocock, historians have shown that the language of “Atlantic republicanism” percolated from the works of Machiavelli through to the American revolutionists and the creation of a large “commercial republic,” and on down to the nineteenth century, where it can be found driving the efforts of British radicals and Chartists. From the mid-1850s to the mid-1880s positivism became the predominant language of Victorian politics by way of injecting “republican sentiments” into discussions of domestic labor conditions and social reform. This discourse of the “moralisation of capital” and empire then passed from the positivists and into the works of such thinkers as H. M. Hyndman, E. Belfort Bax, and Edward Bernstein.

47 Claeys, Gregory, Imperial Sceptics (Cambridge, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 3, 102–17, 273–84.

48 Oxford University, Bodleian Library, Richard Congreve Papers (OUBL-CP), MS.Eng.lett.c.185, ff. 130–44.

49 Stuart Mill, John, A System of Logic, vol. 1 (New York, 1856)Google Scholar, 586–7.

50 Henry Lewes, George, The Biographical History of Philosophy, vol. 4 (London, 1846)Google Scholar, 256.

51 OUBL-CP, MS.Eng.misc.c.349, f. 52.

52 Congreve, Richard, Essays, Political, Social, Religious, 3 vols. (London, 1874–1900)Google Scholar, 3: 529–769.

53 Saint-Simon, Oeuvres, 1: 176–7; Hinsley, Francis Harry, Power and the Pursuit of Peace (Cambridge, 1980)Google Scholar, 102–4.

54 Congreve, Essays, 3: 651.

55 Congreve made these suggestions during the Crimean War. He thought that a union between Europe's two great rivals– France and England– in warfare could commit to a peaceful European social reorganization.

56 Comte, Catechism, 337, 57; Congreve, Essays, 3: 529–769.

57 Aristotle, The Politics of Aristotle with English Notes (London, 1855), x–xviii.

58 Ibid., xxiv. Also see Congreve, Essays, 2: 356, 3: 488–9, 701–4; Martineau, Harriet, “The Religion of Positivism,” Westminster Review 69/136 (1858), 305–50Google Scholar.

59 Congreve, Essays, 1: 107, 201–8, 3: 107–18.

60 The suggestion to establish a “guardianship of nations” to break up empires peacefully became a positivist trope. Bee-Hive, 7 Jan. 1871; Daily News, 7 Jan. 1971; OUBL-CP, MS.Eng.Misc.a.10, f. 32; Congreve, Essays, 1: 74–80; Daily News, 23 Feb. 1882; N.A., “An Anti-Aggression League,” Saturday Review 53/1374 (1882), 224–5; Congreve, Essays, 2: 453; Daily News, 12 Jan. 1886.

61 The Reasoner, 5 May 1861; Congreve, Essays, 3: 521–4, 771–83, 1: 375–83; Comte, System, 1: 262; Swinny, S. H., “The Fiftieth Anniversary of the Positivist School,” Positivist Review 178 (1920), 273–80Google Scholar; BL-PP, Add.MSS, 43,844, ff. 3–34; TG, March 1869; Harrison, Frederic, The Creed of a Layman (London, 1907), 293–4Google Scholar; Bill, E. G. W., University Reform in Nineteenth-Century Oxford (Oxford, 1973)Google Scholar, 118–23.

62 Congreve, Richard, Two Addresses (London, 1870)Google Scholar; BL-PP, Add.MSS, 45,243 ff. 3–9.

63 Drew Egbert, Donald, Social Radicalism and the Arts (New York, 1970)Google Scholar, 417.

64 Rykwert, The Seduction of Place, 62.

65 Ingram, John K., ed., Passages from the Letters of Auguste Comte (London, 1901)Google Scholar, 163.

66 Harrison, National Social Problems, 262.

67 Harrison, Frederic, Autobiographic Memoirs, vol. 1 (London, 1911)Google Scholar, 53; Harrison, John Ruskin (London, 1902), 61–2.

68 Comte, Auguste, A General View of Positivism (London, 1908)Google Scholar, 326–86; Martineau, Harriet, ed., Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, vol. 3 (London, 1896)Google Scholar, 42; Harrison, Autobiographic Memoirs, 53.

69 Comte, System, 1: 134.

70 Harrison, Frederic, The Meaning of History (London, 1894)Google Scholar, ii–iii, 54–8, 236.

71 National Review, Oct. 1860; National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, Transactions, 1860 (London, 1860), 54. This war centred on the scuffles between the Master Builders’ Society and trade union operatives working on architecture and urbanism projects for the 1862 international exhibition.

72 National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, Transactions, 1861 (London, 1862), 717–21, 95–6; The Times, 15 July 1861, 22 July 1861; BLPES-HP 1/8, ff. 17–20; Harrison, Frederic, “Lancashire,” Westminster Review 24/1 (1863), 191–219Google Scholar; Harrison, Autobiographic Memoirs, 323.

73 Beesly, E. S., “The Trades’ Union Commission,” Fortnightly Review 2/7 (1867), 1–18Google Scholar, at 1; Beesly, The Sheffield Outrages (London, 1867); Congreve, Richard, Mr. Broadhead and the Anonymous Press (London, 1867)Google Scholar. The inquiry was a “symptom of the enormous social revolution” of modern times, according to Beesly, who stirred immense controversy and nearly lost his post at University College London by suggesting that the Sheffield murders were no less immoral than the Jamaican Mutinies.

74 Harrison, Autobiographic Memoirs, 323.

75 Howell, George, Labour Legislation, Labour Movements and Labour Leaders (London, 1902)Google Scholar, 128.

76 Harrison, Frederic, “The Trades-Union Bill,” Fortnighly Review 6/31 (1869), 30–45Google Scholar; London Metropolitan University, London Trades Council, 2/2, f. 174; The Times, 14 March 1874; Bradford Observer, 20 March 1874; Bishopsgate Institute Library, George Howell Papers, 1/11, f. 20.

77 British Library of Political and Economic Science, Frederic Harrison Papers (BLPES-HP) 2/2, ff. 16–17; Harrison, Frederic, Order and Progress (London, 1875)Google Scholar, 152–237.

78 Potter, George, “The First Point of the New Charter,” Contemporary Review 18/1 (1871), 547–58Google Scholar, at 547.

79 Harrison, Autobiographic Memoirs, 251; Harrison, Frederic, “Our Social Programme,” Positivist Review 13 (1894), 1–5Google Scholar.

80 Harrison, “Our Social Programme.”

81 Harrison, Frederic, “Ideal London,” Contemporary Review 74 (1898): 139–52Google Scholar; Comte, System, 4: 380; Harrison, Frederic, Memories and Thoughts (London, 1906)Google Scholar, 284; Harrison, The Meaning of History, 247–51, 414–31. Like Comte, who outlined a “collective system” of mixed-use, multi-family housing blocks, Harrison described “the future working homes of our great cities” as “a scientific system of tenements.” He imagined detached six-story blocks accommodating thirty families, with spaces for communal cooking, washing, bathing and disporting to supplement those of each flat. Each block would also contain spaces for education, health care, craft, and worship. Transport links, libraries, museums, parks, schools, hospitals, and cemeteries would all remain within walking distance.

82 London County Council, Opening of Kingsway and Aldwych (London, 1905), 3–5. Harrison complained of the greed and collusion of the county council, speculative builders, and architects who cut housing to an over-crowded minimum. Also against Harrison's advice, they built Bush House instead of creating a plaza along the north-northwest side of the St Mary-le-Strand Church. Harrison angrily resigned.

83 Booth, Mary, Charles Booth: A Memoir (London, 1918)Google Scholar, 8–9.

84 Senate House Library, Charles Booth Papers (SHL-BP), MS.797/II/26/15, ff. vii, ix; SHL-BP, MS.797/II/24/6, ff. 7, 15–19.

85 Booth, Charles Booth, 8–9, 95–8.

86 SHL-BP, MS.797/II/26/15, ff. xi–xiv.

87 Booth, Charles, “Life and Labour of the People in London: First Results of an Inquiry Based on the 1891 Census,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 56 (1893), 557–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Booth, Charles, Aves, Ernest, and Higgs, Henry, Family Budgets (London, 1896)Google Scholar, 5–11; Brooke, Michael Z., Le Play (London, 1970), 9–12Google Scholar, 55–8, 166–7.

88 Booth, Charles, “Occupations of the People of the United Kingdom, 1801–81,” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 49 (1886), 314–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Booth, Labour and Life of the People, vol. 2 (London, 1891), 262–96; Booth, Pauperism (London, 1892), 166–7, 200.

89 Booth, Charles, Life and Labour of the People in London, vol. 9 (London, 1904)Google Scholar, 234–80, 309.

90 Booth, Charles, Labour and Life of the People, vol. 1 (London, 1889)Google Scholar, 163–70.

91 Northern Echo, 26 Aug. 1889, 169; Booth, Labour and Life of the People, 1: 169; Harrison, Frederic, “The New Trades-Unionism,” Nineteenth Century 26 (1889), 721–32Google Scholar; Congreve, Essays, 2: 594.

92 Booth, Pauperism, 166–7, 200; Comte, System, 1: 130; Booth, Charles, Old Age Pensions and the Aged Poor (London, 1899)Google Scholar, 36–42, 67–8.

93 Booth, Charles, Improved Means of Locomotion as a First Step towards the Cure of the Housing Difficulties of London (London, 1901), 1–23Google Scholar; The Times, 15 Feb. 1901.

94 Mary Booth, Charles Booth, 95–98; Swinny, S. H., “Two Faithful Lives: Charles Booth and Alasdair Geddes,” Positivist Review 315 (1919), 286–7Google Scholar. Also compare Comte, System, 1: 128–9; Booth, Life and Labour, 9: 165–71.

95 Liveing, Susan and Geddes, Patrick, A Nineteenth-Century Teacher (London, 1926)Google Scholar, 11; Congreve, Essays, 2: 225; Geddes, Patrick, “A Current Criticism of the Positivist School,” Positivist Review 343 (1921), 145–9Google Scholar. In response to Huxley's Lay Sermons (1870), Congreve described Comte's System as the “definitive construction” of sociological science. Geddes later criticized his colleagues for not more fully advancing the complete system of positivism.

96 OUBL-CP, MSS.Eng.lett.c.186, ff. 98–146; OUBL-CP, MSS.Eng.lett.e.57, ff. 136–9. Geddes recalled that Congreve's intellectual impact on him was a “revelation.” Congreve, in fact, regarded Geddes as “my prospect”—the leader of a Scottish positivist society.

97 Geddes, Patrick, The Classification of Statistics (Edinburgh, 1881)Google Scholar, 12, 23–9; University of Strathclyde, Patrick Geddes Papers (US.T-GED) 9/18, f. 176; US.T-GED 2/5/19; US.T-GED 2/5/20.

98 Geddes, Patrick, John Ruskin (Edinburgh, 1884)Google Scholar, 14, 26–7.

99 British Library of Political and Economic Science, London Positivist Society Papers, 1/1, ff. 1–4; Pickering, Auguste Comte, 3: 571; Swinny, “Two Faithful Lives.”

100 Branford, Victor, “The Edinburgh Summer Meeting,” Positivist Review 12 (1893), 215–20Google Scholar.

101 As suggested, Comte's “civic types” were those who lived in cities. They consisted of the “Spiritual power” of intellectuals and emotionals, and “Temporal power” of industrial chiefs and trade unionists. Le Play's “rustic types” were those who lived outside the city proper.

102 Branford, Victor and Geddes, Patrick, Our Social Inheritence (London, 1919)Google Scholar, 35.

103 Swinny, S. H., “Comte and Le Play,” Positivist Review 298 (1917), 223–31Google Scholar.

104 NLS, MS.10556, ff. 109–125, at 109. Also see Geddes, Patrick, The Civic Survey of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1911)Google Scholar, 537; Geddes, “The City Survey,” Garden Cities and Town Planning 1 (1911), 276–85; Patrick Geddes and Gilbert Slater, Ideas at War, (London, 1917), 208; Geddes, Patrick, City Development (Edinburgh, 1904)Google Scholar, 35, 213.

105 Geddes, Patrick, “The Influence of Geographical Conditions on Social Development,” Geographical Journal 12/6 (1898), 580–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Geddes, Education for Economics (Manchester, 1895).

106 Geddes, Education for Economics, 1–28, 47; Mumford, Lewis, The Story of Utopias (New York, 1922)Google Scholar, 233; Comte, System, 2: 302–6, 4: 257–95; Abercrombie, Patrick, “A Civic Society,” Town Planning Review 8/2 (1920), 79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Geddes, Patrick, “Cyprus, Actual and Possible,” Contemporary Review (June 1897), 3–19Google Scholar.

108 Geddes, City Development, 1–3, 21–35, 166, 221; NLS, MS.10612 ff. 2, 18, 22, 25; Comte, System, 4: 274–5. Assuming the role of an “urban hygienist” and offering a synoptic view of Dunfermline life, he stepped beyond the boundaries of the park experiment. He articulated positivist ideas through an array of illustrative media: a topographic model, photographs, and architectural drawings. Geddes aimed to “spiritualise” the body politic by making Dunfermline a “pioneer in education” and “social betterment,” which included a new version of Comte's “Temple of Humanity.” Altogether “park and gardens and culture institutes” would serve as a “Cathedral of the People,” enabling Dunfermlinians to more fully participate in the making of their modern town anew, as the capital of a garden city-state.

109 Geddes, City Development, 3, 20, 98, 210.

110 Royal Institute of British Architects, Transactions: Town Planning Conference London, 10–15 October 1910 (London, 1911), 66–71.

111 KU-LP/11/8/7 ff. 186–207.

112 Geddes, Patrick, Cities in Evolution (London, 1915)Google Scholar, 96, 207–10, 52.

113 Geddes, Patrick, The Civic Survey of Edinburgh (Outlook Tower, 1911)Google Scholar, 537–57.

114 Sociological Society, Sociological Papers, vol. 2 (London, 1906), 92–3; Geddes, Patrick, “Two Steps in Civics,” Town Planning Review 4/3 (1913), 78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

115 Branford, Victor V., “A Craft University,” Athenaeum 1/4626 (1918), 79–82Google Scholar.

116 NAPSS, Transactions, 1861, 3; N.A., Journal of the Dublin Statistical Society, vol. 1 (Dublin, 1856), 322–23; N.A., Transactions of the Manchester Statistical Society, Session 1858–9 (Manchester, 1859), 70–71; Branford, Victor, Interpretations & Forecasts (New York, 1914), 373Google Scholar. There were various social-science and statistical groups but they generally refrained from considerations of sociology. Branford explained that unlike true sociologists, they remained “unilluminated by reference to the constructive and directive formulae of the main founders of sociology . . . they put to sea without a compass.”

117 Halsey, A. H., A History of Sociology in Britain (Oxford, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 9–11, 248; Renwick, Chris, British Sociology's Lost Biological Roots (New York, 2012), 3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abrams, Philip, The Origins of British Sociology, 1834–1914 (Chicago, 1968), 101–43Google Scholar; Kent, R. A., A History of Empirical Sociology (Aldershot, 1981), 91–98Google Scholar; Annan, Noel, The Curious Strength of Positivism in English Political Thought (London, 1959)Google Scholar.

118 Branford, Victor V., “A Sociological Approach towards Unity,” in Hand, James Edward, ed., Ideals of Science and Faith (London, 1904), 103–56, at 136–7Google Scholar.

119 Sociological Society, Sociological Papers, vol. 1 (London, 1905), 142.

120 Mumford, Lewis, Values for Survival (New York, 1946), 153Google Scholar.

121 Branford, Victor, “Survivals and Tendencies in the University,” Sociological Review 7/1 (1914), 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

122 Ibid.

123 Plunkett, Horace, Ireland in the New Century (London, 1904), 226–52Google Scholar; Branford, Victor V., An Undeveloped Estate of the Empire (London, c. 1899), 3–14Google Scholar.

124 Branford, “A Sociological Approach”; Veblen, Thorstein, The Theory of the Leisure Class (New York, 1934)Google Scholar; Branford, Victor, “The Founders of Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 10/1 (1904), 94–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

125 Branford, Interpretations and Forecasts, 301–56.

126 Branford, Victor, “The Mobilisation of National Credit,” Sociological Review 7/4 (1914), 307–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 312; Sociological Society Cities Committee, Papers for the Present, No. 2: The Banker's Part in Reconstruction (London, 1917–19), 1–33, at 4. The Bank of England would consolidate the activities of the Co-partnership Tenants Limited, Agricultural Organisation Society and Urban Banks Association to enable shopkeepers, artisans, and craftspeople to receive credit. Branford claimed that the unification of the nation's financial system mirrored Comte's vision. Idealist financiers, Branford imagined, could act as civic functionaries – a “hieratic craft” of “social selection,” “directing and controlling communitary life and welfare.”

127 Gould, Frederick J., Auguste Comte and Positivism (London, 1916), 9Google Scholar; Branford, Victor, Whitherward? Hell or Eutopia (London, 1921), 1–59Google Scholar; Sociological Society Cities Committee, Papers for the Present, No. 9: The Drift to Revolution (London, 1919), 42.

128 Sociological Society Cities Committee, Papers for the Present, No. 2, 1–17.

129 Sybella Branford, “An Industrial Symposium,” New Age, 7 Dec. 1916; W. Anderson, “Regionalism and an Educational Guild,” New Age, 12 Oct. 1916; Victor V. Branford, “Ora Labora,” The Times, 11 Aug. 1920.

130 Branford, V., “Towards the Third Alternative,” Sociological Review 11 (1919), 62–5Google Scholar; Sociological Society Cities Committee, Papers for the Present, No. 7: The Third Alternative (London 1917–9); Sociological Society Cities Committee, Papers for the Present, No. 14: Earth, Hell, and the Third Alternative (London, 1919); Branford, Victor and Geddes, Patrick, The Coming Polity (London, 1917), 52Google Scholar.

131 Gilbert, E. W., “Practical Regionalism,” Geographical Journal 94/1 (1939), 29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fawcett, C. B., “Natural Divisions of England,” Geographical Journal 49/2 (1917), 124–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Le Play Society, The Tradition of Le Play (London, n.d.), 1–4, at 4.

132 Fawcett, Charles Bungay, Provinces of England (London, 1919), 27Google Scholar.

133 Lanchester, H. V., Town Planning in Madras (London, 1918), 18Google Scholar.

134 See Wilson, Matthew, “A New Civic Spirit for Garden City-States: On the Lifework of Sybella Gurney,” Journal of Planning History 20/10 (2018), 1–25Google Scholar.

135 Branford, Sybella and Farquharson, Alexander, An Introduction to Regional Surveys (London, 1924), 1–17Google Scholar, 32–46.

136 Branford, Victor Verasis and Abercrombie, Patrick, The Coal Crisis and the Future (London, 1926)Google Scholar; Abercrombie, Patrick, Town and Country Planning (London, 1959), 9–130Google Scholar; Mumford, Lewis, The Culture of Cities (London, 1940), 351Google Scholar.

137 Abercrombie, “A Civic Society,” 82.

138 Abercrombie, Patrick, “The Basis of Reconstruction,” Town Planning Review 7/3–4 (1918), 203–10, at 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 Wilson, Matthew, “On the Material and Immaterial Architecture of Organised Positivism in Britain,” Architectural Histories 3/1 (2015), 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

140 Mallgrave, Harry Francis, Architectural Theory: an Anthology from Vitruvius to 1870, vol. 1 (London, 2006), 353–9Google Scholar, 90–94, 506–15; Colquhoun, Alan, Collected Essays in Architectural Criticism (London, 2009), 167–8Google Scholar; Capon, Architectural Theory, 2: 285–6; Bressani, Martin, Architecture and the Historical Imagination (Farnham, 2014), 270Google Scholar.

141 Sullivan, Louis, Democracy (Detroit, 1961), 136Google Scholar; Andrew, David S., Louis Sullivan and the Polemics of Modern Architecture (Chicago, 1985)Google Scholar.

142 Sullivan, Louis, Kindergarten Chats and Other Writings (New York, 1978), 65–102Google Scholar; Sherman, Paul, Louis Sullivan, an Architect in American Thought (Englewood Cliffs, 1962), 93Google Scholar.

143 Wright, Frank Lloyd, Modern Architecture (Princeton, 2008)Google Scholar, xi, 23, 97.

144 Wright, Frank Lloyd, The Disappearing City (New York, 1932), 76Google Scholar.

145 Reyner Banham, Theory and Design, 144; Berlage, Hendrik Petrus, Thoughts on Style, 1886–1909 (Santa Monica, 1996), 37–63Google Scholar, 313.

146 Bergdoll, Berry, European Architecture 1750–1890 (Oxford, 2000), 179–82Google Scholar; Piland, Sherry, “A Positivist Reading of Labrouste Bibliothèque Sainte-Geneviève,” Athanor 10 (1991), 45–51Google Scholar.

147 Alan Colquhoun, Modern Architecture (Oxford, 2002), 68. Muthesius, Hermann, The English House (London, 2007)Google Scholar. Muthesius's celebrated study The English House (1904) helped to introduce positivist ideas and the English Arts and Crafts movement to German designers.

148 Behrens's firm employed Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe.

149 Anderson, Stanford, Peter Behrens and a New Architecture for the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, 2000), 145Google Scholar.

150 van Doesburg, Theo, “Creative Demands,” in Conrads, Ulrich, ed., Programs (Cambridge, 1971), 64–5Google Scholar.

151 Theo van Doesburg, Robert van't Hoff, Vilmos Huszar, et al., “Manifesto I,” in Conrads, Programs, 39–40.

152 Theo van Doesburg, “Towards a Plastic Architecture,” in Conrads, Programs, 78–80.

153 Walter Gropius, “Programme of the Staatliches Bauhaus in Weimar,” in Conrads, Programs, 49.

154 Gropius, Walter, The New Architecture and the Bauhaus (Cambridge, 1965), 54Google Scholar; Galison, Peter, “Aufbau/Bauhaus,” Critical Inquiry 16/4 (1990), 709–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

155 Comte, A General View of Positivism, 327.

156 Martineau, Positive Philosophy, 237.

157 August Comte, System, 1: 123–4.

158 Gropius, Walter, Apollo in the Democracy (New York, 1968), 61Google Scholar.

159 Gropius, Walter, Scope of Total Architecture (New York, 1970), 145Google Scholar.

160 Martineau, Positive Philosophy, 244; Harrison, Autobiographic Memoirs, 391.

161 Comte, Catechism, 140, added emphasis.

162 Fishman, Robert, Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1977), 194–5Google Scholar, 258; CIAM, “La Sarraz Declaration,” in Conrads, Programs, 109–13, at 109.

163 Domhardt, “The Garden City Idea.”

164 Curtis, William J. R., Le Corbusier (New York, 1986), 63Google Scholar; Curtis, Modern Architecture since 1900 (London, 2013), 225.

165 Mumford, The CIAM Discourse, 2.

166 CIAM, “La Sarraz Declaration,” 110.

167 Ibid., 167.

168 “Charter of Athens,” in Conrads, Programs, 137–45, at 138, 141.

169 Lewis Mumford, Culture of Cities, 351.

170 Mumford, The CIAM Discourse, 238.

171 Edger and Metcalf, Lettres D'Auguste Comte, 13–14; Comte, Correspondance inédite, 327–8; Comte, A General View, 326–86; Geddes, Patrick and Slater, Gilbert, Ideas at War (London, 1917), 221Google Scholar.

172 Eisenman, Peter, “Post-functionalism,” in Nesbitt, Kate, ed., Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture (Princeton, 1996), 78–83Google Scholar. Moore, Stephen, “Technology, Place, and Nonmodern Regionalism,” in Canizaro, Vincent B., ed., Architectural Regionalism (New York, 2007), 432–445Google Scholar.

173 Liveing and Geddes, A Nineteenth-Century Teacher, 9.