Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T23:10:57.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social cohesion and economic development: some reflections on the Italian case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2016

Sandro Busso  and
Luca Storti
Sandro Busso*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Centro de investigação e Estudos de Sociologia (CIES-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal
Luca Storti
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
*
∗Corresponding author. Email: sandro.busso@unito.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The processes of globalisation, market deregulation and the retreat of the welfare state in advanced capitalist societies have revitalised the debate about how to reconcile economic development and social cohesion. This debate has been widespread in Italy, where great differences occur between local contexts as regards economic performance, the level of inequality and, more generally, the cohesion of the social fabric. Within this framework, this paper explores the level of both economic development and social cohesion in Italian provinces, through the analysis of secondary data. With particular reference to the Italian situation, the article therefore contributes to the debate on the focalisation and operationalisation of the two concepts. Finally, the complex relation between economic development and social cohesion is analysed, and its non-linear trend is outlined.

Keywords

Economic developmentsocial cohesioninequalitiesNorth–South divideMezzogiornoTerza ItaliaThird Italy
Type
Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 18 , Issue 2: Special Issue: The Cult of Mussolini in Twentieth-Century Italy Guest Editors: Christopher Duggan, Stephen Gundle and Giuliana Pieri , May 2013 , pp. 197 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asso, P. F., and Trigilia, C., eds. 2010. Remare controcorrente. Imprese e territori dell'innovazione in Sicilia. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. 1988. La costruzione sociale del mercato. Studi sullo sviluppo di piccola impresa in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. 2007. Prima lezione di sociologia. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A. 2009. “Il nord: una città-regione globale?” Stato e Mercato, no. 2:163–186.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, A., and Storti, L. 2008. “Gli imprenditori dello sviluppo locale.” In Ceto medio. Come e perché occuparsene, edited by Bagnasco, A., 255–283. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ballarino, G., and Schadee, H. 2005. “Civic and Economic Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis of Italian Provinces, 1980–2000.” European Sociological Review 21(3):243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Berger-Schmitt, R. 2002. “Considering Social Cohesion in Quality of Life Assessments: Concepts and Measurements.” Social Indicators Research, no. 58:403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger-Schmitt, R., and Noll, H. H. 2000. Conceptual Framework and Structure of a European System of Social Indicators. Mannheim: EuReporting Working Paper no. 9.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. 1999. “Social Cohesion: A Dialectical Critique of a Quasi Concept.”, Working paper. Accessed 30 June, 2011. http://www.omiss.ca Google Scholar
Bonazzi, G. 2008. Storia del pensiero organizzativo. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Bottazzi, G. 2007. Sviluppo e sottosviluppo. Idee, teorie, speranze e delusioni. Cagliari: Aisara.Google Scholar
Busso, S., and Storti, L. 2011. “I contesti ad alta densità mafiosa: un quadro socio–economico.” In Alleanze nell'ombra. Mafie ed economie locali in Sicilia e nel Mezzogiorno, edited by Sciarrone, R., 67–94. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Camozzi, A. 2008. “Coesione sociale: definizioni e metodologie di misurazione a confronto.” Sociologia e politiche sociali 11(2):35–54.Google Scholar
Cannari, L., and Franco, D. 2011. “Il mezzogiorno: ritardi, qualità dei servizi pubblici, politiche.” Stato e Mercato, no. 91:3–40.Google Scholar
Cartocci, R. 2007. Mappe del tesoro. Atlante del capitale sociale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cerea, S., Cucca, R., and Rago, M. 2010. Sviluppo economico e integrazione sociale: il caso dei distretti industriali lombardi. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Chan, J., To, H. P., and Chan, E. 2006. “Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research.” Social Indicators Research, no. 75:273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, P. 1999. Metodologia e tecniche della ricerca sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 1999. Social Change in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Commission, European. 2004. A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation, Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion3/cohesion3_en.htm (last accessed 8 April 2013).Google Scholar
Franzini, M. 2010. Ricchi e poveri. L'Italia e le disuguaglianze (in)accettabili. Milan: EGEA.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E. 2004. “Social Cohesion.” Annual Review of Sociology, no. 30:409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Guizzardi, L. 2008. “Che cos'è, oggi, la coesione sociale? Alcune riflessioni semantiche di un concetto-pilastro della sociologia.” Sociologia e politiche sociali 11(2):11–34.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. 2006. “Inequality and the Knowledge Economy: Running to Stand Still?” Social Policy & Society 5(2):207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Istat, . 2010. Conti economici nazionali, http://www.istat.it/conti/nazionali (last accessed 8 April 2013).Google Scholar
Jenson, J. 1998. Mapping Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research, CPRN Study F/03. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. 1955. “Economic Growth and Income Inequality.” American Economic Review, no. 45:1–28.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1969. “Dai concetti agli indici empirici.” In L'analisi empirica nelle scienze sociali, edited by Boudon, R. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. Vol. 1, 41–52. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Leti, G. 1983. Statistica descrittiva. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lockwood, D. 1999. “Civic Integration and Social Cohesion.” In Capitalism and Social Cohesion: Essays on Exclusion and Integration, edited by Gough, I., and Olofsson, G., 63–84. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyson, T. A. 2006. “Big Business and Community Welfare: Revisiting a Classic Study by C. Wright Mills and Melville Ulmer.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, no. 65:1001–1023.Google Scholar
Marradi, A. 2007. Metodologia delle scienze sociali. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Martinelli, A. 2004. La modernizzazione. Rome–Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W., and Ulmer, M. 1946. Small Business and Civic Welfare: Report of the Smaller War Plants Corporation to the Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
O'Connell, M. 2003. “Anti ‘Social Capital’. Civic Values versus Economic Equality in the EU.” European Sociological Review 19(3):241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perulli, P., and Pichierri, A., eds. 2010. La crisi italiana nel mondo globale. Economia e società del Nord. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Poggio, T. 2007. “L'analisi secondaria di dati quantitativi: opportunità, problemi, fonti.” In Le ricerche di Petronilla. Una guida alle fonti statistiche per l'analisi secondaria nella ricerca sociale, edited by Trento, A.A.V.V.: Quaderno n. 38, Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Università di Trento.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R. Y. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z. R., and Beaujot, R. 2007. “Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating.” Social Indicators Research, no. 3:461–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranci, C., and Torri, R. 2006. Milano tra coesione sociale e sviluppo. Milan: Bruno Mondadori.Google Scholar
Ricolfi, L. 2010. Il sacco del nord. Saggio sulla giustizia territoriale. Milan: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behaviour of Individuals.” American Sociological Review, no. 15:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, M., and Santambrogio, A., eds. 2002. Émile Durkheim, contributi ad una rilettura critica. Rome: Meltemi.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2002. “Cities in a World Economy.” In Readings in Urban Theory, edited by Fainstein, S. S. and Campbell, S., 32–56. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sciarrone, R., ed. 2011. Alleanze nell'ombra. Mafie ed economie locali in Sicilia e nel Mezzogiorno. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Serravalli, G. 1999. Teatro regio, teatro comunale. Società, istituzioni e politica a Modena e a Parma. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Steiner, P. 2001. Economia, mercati, società. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J. P. 2010. La misura sbagliata delle nostre vite. Perché il PIL non basta più per valutare benessere e progresso sociale. Milan: Etas.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. 2000. Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomassi, F. 2009. “Efficienza ed equità, flessibilità e sicurezza in Europa e in Italia.” Stato e Mercato 3:301–327.Google Scholar
Trigilia, C. 2008. “Come sostenere i sud che si muovono. Ovvero, perché non bisogna tornare al ‘mezzogiorno’.” Meridiana, no. 61:169–188.Google Scholar
Trigilia, C. 2011. “Perché non si è sciolto il nodo del Mezzogiorno? Un problema di sociologia economica.” Stato e Mercato, no. 91:41–75.Google Scholar
Viesti, G. 2011. “Un commento.” Stato e Mercato, no. 91:87–94.Google Scholar
Zajczyk, F. 1997. Il mondo degli indicatori sociali. Rome: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar