Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:53:24.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluorescent Carbon Particles formed from Concentrated Glucose Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2019

Tomilola Obadiya
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE68178, U.S.A.
Harsh Uppala
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE68178, U.S.A.
David Sidebottom*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE68178, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Simple glucose solutions were heat treated in an attempt to produce carbon nanodots (CNDTs) with a monodisperse size distribution using a bottom-up approach. Absorption and fluorescence properties of the heat-treated solutions display remarkable similarity to CNDTs reported in the literature. However, particle-sizing and AFM measurements indicate the increasing fluorescence is accompanied by the growth of particles that are larger than most CNDTs discussed in the literature (a concentrated population of monodisperse 30 nm particles and a low concentration of much larger, roughly 500 nm, particles). A dialysis study, shows these larger particles are not responsible for the bulk of the optical properties but, rather the optical properties likely stem from molecular by-products that accompany the heating and caramelization of the sugar.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Jaiswal, A., Ghosh, S. S. and Chattopadhyay, A., Chem. Commun. 48, 407 - 409 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, H., Wang, X., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, F. and Yang, X., Chem. Commun. 2009, 5118 - 5120 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Kang, Z., Liu, Y., and Lee, S-T., J. of Materials Chem. 22(46), 24230 - 24253 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, M., et al. , Nano Lett. 15, 6030 - 6035 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sk, M. P., Jaiswal, A, Paul, A., Ghosh, S. S. and Chattopadhyay, A., Sci. Reports (Nature) 2, 383 (2012).Google Scholar
Tang, L., et al. , ACS Nano 6(6), 5102-5110 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, S. N. and Baker, G. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6726-6744 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X. Y., Ray, R., Gu, Y. L., J Ploehn, H., Gearheart, L., Raker, K., and Scrivens, W. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 12736-12737 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidebottom, D., Phys. Rev. E 76, 011505 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidebottom, D. and Tran, T., Phys. Rev. E 82, 051904 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelis, A., Ann. Chem. Phys. 52(3), 352 - 404 (1858).Google Scholar
Tomasik, P., Pakasinski, M. and Wiejak, S., Adv. Carbohyd. Chem. Biochem. 47, 203 - 278 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essner, J. B., Kist, J. A., Polo-Parada, L., and Baker, G. A., Chem. Mater. 30, 1878 - 1887 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar