Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:26:55.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacterial Cellulose Produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus Culture Using Complex Carbon Sources for Biomedical Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2016

Mayra Elizabeth Garcia-Sanchez ,
Ines Jimenez Palomar ,
Yolanda Gonzalez-Garcia  and
Jorge R. Robledo-Ortiz
Mayra Elizabeth Garcia-Sanchez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Ines Jimenez Palomar*
Affiliation:
inMateriis S.A. de C.V., Guadalajara, Mexico.
Yolanda Gonzalez-Garcia
Affiliation:
Departamento de Madera, Celulosa y Papel, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Jorge R. Robledo-Ortiz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Madera, Celulosa y Papel, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
*
*(Email: ines.jimenez@inmateriis.com)
Get access

Abstract

Tissue engineering scaffolding is the external media or structure in which cell growth, migration and reproduction is enabled in order to stimulate tissue regeneration. In order to promote tissue regeneration, scaffolding materials are required to have certain properties such as biocompatibility, adequate mechanical properties and surface topographical features in order to provide specific biological signals to promote cell attachment and proliferation [1].

Cellulose is the most abundant, inexpensive and readily available carbohydrate polymer in the world and it is traditionally extracted from plants or their wastes [2]. Although the plant itself is the major contributor of cellulose, various types of bacteria are able to produce cellulose and it is termed bacterial cellulose [3]. Bacterial cellulose is a well suited scaffold for tissue regeneration due to its biocompatibility, mechanical properties and its ability to be combined with other structures such calcium phosphates [4], which can create composites with intrinsic properties that meet the requirements of the different tissues of the human body [5].

Through additive manufacturing, highly complex structures can be created which are similar to those found in nature. This work will explore the different ways to produce biomimetic structures for tissue engineering applications through the combination of bacterial cellulose and additive manufacturing producing complex structures of a highly a biocompatible material for a range of different biomedical applications [6]. In addition to the manufacturing and processing techniques, the use of mango (juice/peel) as a complex carbon source for the production of bacterial cellulose was investigated.

Keywords

biomedicalbiomaterialbiological synthesis (assembly)
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 36: Soft Materials and Biomaterials , 2016 , pp. 2563 - 2567
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Helenius, Gisela, Bäckdahl, Henrik, Bodin, Aase, Nannmark, Ulf, Gatenholm, Paul, and Risberg, Bo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 76, no. 2 (2006).Google Scholar
Esa, Faezah, Masrinda Tasirin, Siti, and Abd Rahman, Norliza. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2 (2014).Google Scholar
Jozala, Angela Faustino, Aparecida Nedel Pértile, Renata, Alves dos Santos, Carolina, de Carvalho Santos-Ebinuma, Valéria, Martins Seckler, Marcelo, Miguel Gama, Francisco, and Pessoa, Adalberto Jr. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 99, no. 3 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Honglin, Xiong, Guangyao, Zhang, Chen, Li, Deying, Zhu, Yong, Guo, Ruisong, and Wan, Yizao. Materials Science and Engineering: C 49 (2015).Google Scholar
Petersen, Nathan, and Gatenholm, Paul. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 91, no. 5 (2011).Google Scholar
Markstedt, Kajsa, Mantas, Athanasios, Tournier, Ivan, Ávila, Héctor Martínez, Hägg, Daniel, and Gatenholm, Paul. Biomacromolecules 16, no. 5 (2015).Google Scholar
Yamada, Yuzo, Yukphan, Pattaraporn, Thi Lan Vu, Huong, Muramatsu, Yuki, Ochaikul, Duangjai, Tanasupawat, Somboon, and Nakagawa, Yasuyoshi. The Journal of general and applied microbiology 58, no. 5 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, R. E., Ph, D., & Anderson, S. M. Biogenesis of Bacterial Cellulose, 435–447(1991).Google Scholar
Klemm, D., Schumann, D., Udhardt, U., & Marsch, , Progress in Polymer Science, 26(9), 1561–1603 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandamme, E. J., De Baets, S., Vanbaelen, a., Joris, K., & De Wulf, P. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 59(1–3), 93–99 (1998).Google Scholar
Nimeskern, Luc, Ávila, Héctor Martínez, Sundberg, Johan, Gatenholm, Paul, Müller, Ralph, and Stok, Kathryn S.. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 22 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, Cristian J., Torres, Fernando G., Gomez, Clara M., Troncoso, Omar P., Canet-Ferrer, Josep, and Martínez-Pastor, Juan. Materials Science and Engineering: C 29, no. 4 (2009).Google Scholar
Sundberg, Johan, Guccini, Valentina, Håkansson, Karl MO, Salazar-Alvarez, German, Toriz, Guillermo, and Gatenholm, Paul. Polymer 75 (2015).Google Scholar
Åkerholm, Margaretha, Hinterstoisser, Barbara, and Salmén, Lennart. Carbohydrate research 339, no. 3 (2004).Google Scholar