Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:30:25.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antisite Defects and Nonequilibrium Phase Transition in Intermetallics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Among the many point defects in crystalline solids, antisite defects play a key role in the stability of intermetallics. Such defects are either thermal equilibrium defects or are introduced by some external forcing.

There are, indeed, many examples where intermetallics or compound semiconductors are “driven,” i.e., sustained in nonequilibrium configurations by external forcing. Good examples include the following:

∎ Intermetallics in alloys under irradiation, like FeZr2 in Zircalloy used as a cladding material in pressurized water nuclear reactors, or any of the compounds produced by ion implantation or ion beam mixing (atoms are continuously forced to change lattice sites because of replacement collsions). See, for example, Reference 1.

∎ Intermetallics in superalloys under cyclic fatigue (γ′ precipitates in persistent slip bands undergo sustained shearing, and sometimes redissolves).

∎ Intermetallics during high-energy ball milling, a promising technique to stabilize nonequilibrium phases.

∎ Ordered compounds when formed by vapor phase deposition.

In such compounds, atoms are forced to leave their optimum local surroundings by nuclear collisions, shearing, fracturing, and welding respectively, or land on a surface at a random position, while thermal jumps tend to restore some degree of local atomic order. For simplicity, we call such compounds “driven systems” or “driven intermetallics.” Indeed, such systems are driven away from the usual thermodynamic equilibrium by a permanent dynamical forcing (nuclear collisions, plastic shear, etc.).

Type
Point Defects Part II
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Banerjee, S., Urban, K., and Wilkens, M., Acta Metall. 35 (1984) p. 234.Google Scholar
2.Brechet, Y., Louchet, F., Marchionni, C., and Verger-Gaugry, J.L., Philos. Mag. 56 (1987) p. 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Martin, G. and Gaffet, E., J. de Physique Colloque C4, Suppl. 14, 51 (1990) p. 71.Google Scholar
4.Bellon, P., Chevalier, J.P., Augarde, E., Andre, J.P., and Martin, G., J. Appl. Phys. 66 (1988) p. 2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bellon, P. and Martin, G., Phys. Rev. B39 (1989) p. 2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Haider, E., Bellon, P., and Martin, G., Phys. Rev. B42 (1990) p. 8274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kubo, R., Matsuo, K., and Kitahara, K., J. Stat. Phys. 9 (1973) p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bellon, P. and Martin, G., in Characterization of the Structure and Chemistry of Defects in Materials, edited by Larson, B.C., Rühle, M., and Seidman, D.N. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 138, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) p. 15; P. Bellon, F. Haider, and G. Martin, in Radiation Materials Science, proc. of the international conference held in Alushta, U.S.S.R. (1990), to appear in J. Nucl. Mater.Google Scholar
9.Soisson, F., Bellon, P., and Martin, G., to be published.Google Scholar
10.Chen, Y., Le Hazif, R., and Martin, G., Proc. International Symposium on Mechanical Alloying, Kyoto, 1991.Google Scholar
11.Rehn, L.E., Okamoto, P.R., Pearson, J., Bhadra, R., and Grimsditch, M., Phys. Rev. Let. 59 (1987) p. 2987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Limoge, Y., Rahman, A., Hsieh, H. and Yip, S., J. Non Cryst. Solids 99 (1988) p. 75; C. Massobrio, V. Pontikis, and G. Martin, Phys. Rev. B41 (1990) p. 10486; M.J. Sabochick and N.Q. Lam, Scripta Met. 24 (1990) p. 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar