Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T07:23:45.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Bardeen and the BCS Theory of Superconductivity*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Lillian Hoddeson
Get access

Extract

Every theory of superconductivity can be disproved! This tongue-in-cheek theorem struck a chord when Felix Bloch announced it in the early 1930s. Virtually every major physicist then working on theory—including Bloch, Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli, Werner Heisenberg, Lev Landau, Leon Brillouin, W. Elsasser, Yakov Frenkel, and Ralph Kronig—had tried and failed to explain the mysterious phenomenon in which below a few degrees kelvin certain metals and alloys lose all their electrical resistance. The frequency with which Bloch's theorem was quoted suggests the frustration of the many physicists who were struggling to explain superconductivity.

Neither the tools nor the evidence were yet adequate for solving the problem. These would gradually be created during the 1940s and 1950s, but bringing them to bear on superconductivity and solving the long-standing riddle required a special set of talents and abilities: a deep understanding of quantum mechanics and solid-state physics, confidence in the solubility of the problem, intuition about the phenomenon, a practical approach to problem-solving, patience, teamwork, and above all refusal to give up in the face of repeated failures. When John Bardeen took on the problem of superconductivity in the late 1930s, he held it like a bulldog holds a piece of meat, until he, his student J. Robert Schrieffer, and postdoctoral candidate Leon Cooper solved it in 1957.

Type
Special Feature
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 50 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article draws in part on a manuscript by L. Hoddeson and V. Daitch, Centle Genius: The Life and Physics of John Bardeen; and on sections on superconductivit y by L. Hoddeson and G. Baym, “Collective Phenomena,” in Out of the Crystal Maze: A History of Solid State Physics, 1900–1960, edited by L. Hoddeson, E. Braun, J. Teichmann, and S. Weart (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992) p. 489.

References

1.Hoddeson, L., Baym, G., and Eckeri, M. “The Development of the Quantum Mechani cal Electron Theory of Metals, 1926-1933,” in Out of the Crystal Maze: A History of Solid Stat Physics, 1900-1960, (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992) pp. 88-181, esp. 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sommerfeld, A. and Bethe, H., “Elektronen theorie der Metalle,” in Handbuch der Physik Ser. 2, edited by Geiger, H. and Shee, K. (Springer, Berlin, 1933) 24, pp. 333-622, quot on p. 555.Google Scholar
3. For example, see Hoddeson, L. and Baym, G, “Collective Phenomena,” in Out of the Crystal Maze: A History of Solid State Physia 1900-1960, Chapter 8, edited by Hoddeson, L.Braun, E., Teichmann, J., and Weart, S. (Oxfon University Press, New York, 1992) p. 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wigner, E.P. and Bardeen, J., “Theory of th Work Functions of Monovalent Metals,” Phys. Rev. 48 (1935), p. 84; J. Bardeen, “Theory of the Work Function, II. The Surface Double Layer,” Phys. Rev., 49 (1936) p. 653; Phys. Rev., “Reminiscences of Early Days in Solid State Physics,” in The Be ginnings of Solid State Physics, edited by Si Nevill Mott (The Royal Society, London, 1980) p. 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. For example, see Riordan, M. and Hoddeson, L., Crystal Fire: The Birth of the Information Age (W.W. Norton, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
6.Jones, H., Mott, N.F., and Skinner, H.W.B., “A Theory of the Form of the X-ray Emission Bands and Metals,” Phys. Rev. 45 (1934) p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bardeen, J., “Reminiscences of Early Days in Solid State Physics,” in The Beginnings of Solid State Physics, edited by SirMott, Nevill (The Royal Society, London, 1980) p. 77.Google Scholar
8.Bardeen, J., London, F. and London, H., “Supra leitung und Diamagnetismus,” Physica 2 (1935) p. 341; F. London, “Macroscopic Interpretation of Supraconductivity,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 152 (1935) p. 24. For a summar of research on superconductivity up to the Second World War, see P.F. Dahl, Superconductivity: Its Historical Roots and Development from Mercury to the Ceramic Oxides (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992). Fo insight into the work of the London brothers see K. Gavroglu, Fritz London: A Scientific Biography (Cambridge University Press, Nev York, 1995); Out of the Crystal Maze: A History of Solid State Physics, 1900-1960, Chapter 8 edited by L. Hoddeson, E. Braun, J. Teichmann, and S. Weart (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992) p. 588, n 21, p. 141 and Sec. IV. “Superconductivity, 1929-1933,” in L. Hoddeson, G. Baym, and M. Eckert, “The Development of the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Metals, 1928-1933,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 (1987) p. 287.Google Scholar
9.London, F. and London, H., “Supraleitung und Diamagnetismus,” Physica 2 (1935) p. 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Shoenberg, D., Superconductivity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1938). (In the mid-50s, Bardeen would recommend the 1952 edition of this book to his post-doc Leon Cooper.)Google Scholar
11.Bardeen, J., “Theory of Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 59 (1941) p. 928. (Bardeen would employ a similar approach in his work during the 1980s on charge density waves.)Google Scholar
12.Riordan, M. and Hoddeson, L., Crystal Fire: The Birth of the Information Age (W.W. Norton, New York, 1997) pp. 185–192.Google Scholar
13. Brattain interview by C. Weiner, May 28, 1974, AIP, quoted in Riordan, M. and Hoddeson, L., Crystal Fire: The Birth of the Information Age (W.W. Norton, New York, 1997) p. 190.Google Scholar
14. The evidence came from work by a group of experimenters based in different labs including Pippard, A.B., Fairbank, W., Maxwell, E., Marcus, P., Daunt, J.C., Mendelssohn, K., Goodman, B., Brown, A., Zemansky, M., Boorse, H., Corak, W., Tinkham, M., and Glover, R.E..Google Scholar
15. J. Bardeen notes (May 15-May 18, 1950), papers, University of Illinois Archives; Bardeen, J., “Zero-Point Vibrations and Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 79 (1950) p. 167; Out of the Crystal Maze: A History of Solid State Physics, 1900-1960, Chapter 8, edited by L. Hoddeson, E. Braun, J. Teichmann, and S. Weart (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992) p. 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Fröhlich, H., ’Isotope Effect in Superconductivity,” (letter) Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), Sect. A 63 (1950) p. 778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Bardeen, J. to Peierls, R., July 17, 1951, Peierls Papers, Oxford.Google Scholar
18.Seitz, F. interview by Hoddeson, L., Daitch, V., and Elichirigoity, I., April 22, 1993.Google Scholar
19.Pines, D. interview with Hoddeson, L. and Daitch, V., December 3, 1993.Google Scholar
20.Bohm, D. interview by Hoddeson, L., May 8, 1981; Out of the Crystal Maze: A History of Solid State Physics, 1900-1960, Chapter 8, edited by Hoddeson, L., Braun, E., Teichmann, J., and Weart, S. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992) p. 536.Google Scholar
21.Pines, D. interview by Hoddeson, L., August Band 16,1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Bardeen, J. and Pines, D., “Electron-Phonon Interaction in Metals,” Phys. Rev. 99 (1955) p. 1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Bardeen, J., “Theory of Superconductivity. Theoretical Part,” in Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 15 (Springer, Berlin, 1956) p. 274.Google Scholar
24.Bardeen, J., “History of Superconductivity Research,” in Impact of Basic Research on Technology, edited by Kursonoglu, B. and Perlmutter, A. (Plenum Press, New York, 1973) p. 15.Google Scholar
25.Schrieffer, J.R. interview with Warnow, J. and Williams, R.M., September 26, 1974.Google Scholar
26.London, F., Superfluids: Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity, vol. 1 (John Wiley, New York, 1950) pp. 142–155.Google Scholar
27.Cooper, L.N., “Bound Electron Pairs in a Degenerate Fermi Gas,” Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) p. 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Lazarus, D. interview with Elichirigoity, I., February 24, 1992.Google Scholar
29.Greytak, B. Bardeen, Bardeen family interview with Hoddeson, L. and Riordan, M., March 15, 1992.Google Scholar
30.Bardeen, J. to Goudsmit, S.A., February 15, 1957, Bardeen Papers, University of Illinois Archives.Google Scholar
31.Bardeen, J., Cooper, L.N., and Schrieffer, J.R., “Microscopic Theory of Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) p. 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Slichter, C., John Bardeen Memorial talk, February 8, 1991.Google Scholar
33. Among the first were Morse, R.W. and Bohm, H.V. at Glover, Brown and R.E. and Tinkham, M. at Berkeley.Google Scholar
34.Bardeen, J., Cooper, L.N., and Schrieffer, J.R., “Theory of Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) p. 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Brown, L., Brout, R., Cao, T.Y., Higgs, P., and Nambu, Y., “Panel Session: Spontaneous Breaking of Symmetry,” in The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 70s, edited by Hoddeson, L., Brown, L.M., Dresden, M., and Riordan, M. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997) p. 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar