Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:50:39.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparing Narrow Size Distribution Particles from Amphiphilic Association Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Anthony J.I. Ward  and
Stig E. Friberg
Get access

Extract

Small inorganic particles with a narrow size distribution have been prepared from aqueous and organic solutions under varied temperatures, pressures, and concentrations. This article reviews the preparation of such particles from microemulsions and liquid crystals and shows how these amphiphilic association structures can have a pronounced influence on the size, shape, and even chemical composition of the precipitated particles.

Surfactants associate in the presence of water to form micelles and lyotropic mesophases. This is a consequence of the molecular geometrical packing requirements, superposed on the dissolution behavior of these substances. Associated structures that have shapes with the lowest free energy are preferentially formed. A balance is attained between the interactions of the hydrophobic portions of the surfactant, reducing the unfavorable contact with aqueous environs and the interactions between the headgroups. The composition regions of these different phases have been widely studied. Micelles exist as normal and reversed structures (Figure 1), while the liquid crystalline phases show a variety of structures which have been studied in great detail.

Figure 1 gives a simplified example of the structural conditions in different parts of a phase diagram of the three components water/surfactant/amphiphilic substance (e.g., medium chain length alcohol). The interaction between water and the surfactant is sufficiently pronounced to permit the formation of reversed micelles. The association structures of different regions shown in Figure 1 include normal (L1) and reversed micelles (L2). The hexagonal phase (E) consists of a hexagonal array of cylinders with the hydrocarbon chains situated in the center of the cylinder, while the reverse hexagonal phase (F) is built of cylinders with aqueous centers. The lamellar phase (Lα) is made up of infinite sheets of bimolecularly arranged surfactant molecules separated by aqueous layers. The physical properties and reasons for the formation of such lyotropic phases have been discussed extensively.

Type
Fine Particles Part I
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 12 , December 1989 , pp. 41 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ekwall, P., in Adv. in Liquid Crystals, Vol. 1, edited by Brown, G.H. (Academic Press, New York, 1975) p. 1.Google Scholar
2.Lindman, B. and Wennerstrom, H., Phys. Rep. 52 (1979) p. 1.Google Scholar
3.Tiddy, G.J.T., Phys. Rep. 57 (1980) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lindman, B. and Wennerstrom, H., Topics in Chemistry No. 87: Micelles (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980) p. 1.Google Scholar
5.Israelachvili, J.N., Mitchell, B.J., and Ninham, B.W., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. II 72 (1976) p. 1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Mitchell, B.J. and Ninham, B.W., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. II 76 (1981) p. 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Friberg, S.E. and Buraczewska, I., Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. 63 (1978) p. 10.Google Scholar
8.Matijević, E., Acc. Chem. Res. 14 (1981) p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Matijević, E., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 15 (1985) p. 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Boutonnet, M., Anderson, C., and Carsson, R., Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A A34 (1980) p. 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Boutonnet, M., Kizling, J., and Stenius, P., Colloids Surf. 5 (1982) p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kurihara, K., Kizling, J., Stenius, P., and Fendler, J.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) p. 2574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Prince, L.M., Surfactant Science Series, Vol 6, edited by Lissant, K.J. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1976) p. 125.Google Scholar
14.Ober, R. and Taupin, C., J. Phys. Chem. 84 (1980) p. 2418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Friberg, S.E., Buraczewska, I., and Sjoblom, E., Adv. Chem. Ser. 177 (1979) p. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Shinoda, K. and Friberg, S.E., Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 4 (1975) p. 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lindman, B., Stilbs, P., and Moseley, M.E., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 83 (1981) p. 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Nagy, J.B., Gorgue, A., and Deroune, E.G., Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. (1982); Preparation of Catalysts, Third International Symposium on Scientific Bases for the Preparation of Heterogeneous Catalysts, Louvain-la-Neuve, Sept. 1982 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982).Google Scholar
19.Lufimpadio, N., Nagy, J.B., and Derouane, E.G., in Surfactants in Solution, Vol. 3, edited by Mittal, K.L. and Lindman, B. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984) p. 1483–1497.Google Scholar
20.Eicke, H.F., Shepherd, J.C.W., and Steinemann, A., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 56 (1976) p. 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Robinson, B.H., Steytler, D.C., and Tack, R.D., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. I 5 (1979) p. 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Fletcher, P.D.I., Robinson, B.H., Bermijo-Barrera, F., and Oakenfull, D.G., in Microemulsions, edited by Robb, I.D. (Plenum Press, New York, 1982) p. 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Lang, J., Djavanbakht, A., and Zana, R., in Microemulsions, edited by Robb, I.D. (Plenum Press, New York, 1982) p. 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Fletcher, P.D.I., Howe, A.M., Perrins, N.M., Robinson, B.H., Toprakcioglu, C., and Dore, J.C., in Surfactants in Solution, Vol. 3, edited by Mittal, K.L. and Lindman, B. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984) p. 1745–1758.Google Scholar
25.Atik, S.S. and Thomas, J.K., Chem. Phys. Lett. 79 (1981) p. 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Kurihara, K., Kizling, J., Stenius, P., and Fendler, J.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) p. 2574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Eicke, H.F., Top. Curr. Chem. 87 (1980) p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Zulauf, M. and Eicke, H.F., J. Phys. Chem. 83 (1979) p. 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Dvolaitzky, M., Ober, R., Taupin, C., Anthore, R., Auvray, X., Petipas, C., and Williams, C., J. Disp. Sci. Techn. 4 (1983) p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Kon-no, K., Koide, M., and Kitahara, A., Nippon Kagaku Kaishi (1984) p. 815.Google Scholar
31.Koide, M., Kon-no, K., and Kitahara, A., Shikizai 58 (1985) p. 699.Google Scholar
32.Kandori, K., Shizuka, N., Kon-no, K., and Kitahara, A., J. Disp. Sci. Techn. 8 (1987) p. 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Friberg, S.E. and Yang, C.C., Proc. Natl. Conf. Metallurgy Soc. (1989), in press.Google Scholar
34.Tamura, H. and Matijević, E., J. Colloids Interface Sci. 90 (1982) p. 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Jean, J.H. and Ring, T., Colloids Surf. 29 (1988) p. 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Haruta, M. and Delmon, B., J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1986) p. 859.Google Scholar
37.Matijević, E., Pure Appl. Chem. 60 (1988) p. 1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Castellano, M. and Matijević, E., Chem. Mat. 1 (1989) p. 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Shinoda, K., J. Phys. Chem. 81 (1977) p. 1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Kjellander, R. and Flaim, E., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. I 177 (1981) p. 2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar