Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T18:21:12.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status of Low-Dose Implantation for VLSI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

T.E. Seidel  and
L.A. Larson
Get access

Extract

This article describes the current status of implantation in silicon for ion doses up to but not including the onset of the amorphous state. Physical phenomena, applications to VLSI, and equipment issues are discussed and linked from the viewpoint of vertically integrated technologies (see Figure 1). In such a view, engineering applications are the customer of research on phenomena, and the equipment industry is the customer of both the research and applications community. The article highlights areas in phenomena, applications, and equipment requiring particular attention.

Studies in physical phenomena associated with ion implantation are motivated by the need for very shallow junctions. The shallowness is limited by ion channeling effects in crystalline silicon (which directly affect the as-implanted impurity profile) and by diffusion (which occurs during implant activation and annealing of damage). The inventory of ion-damage induced defects includes point defects, cluster defects, and dislocations arising from the combination of damage and annealing. A recent survey by Schreutelkamp et al. of low-dose implantation describes advances in characterization of channeling effects, and the formation of dislocation damage which, in turn, impacts thermally processed profiles. These effects need to be understood in terms of modern MOS (metal-oxide-semiconductor) processes.

Type
Ion-Assisted Processing of Electronic Materials
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , June 1992 , pp. 34 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Schreutelkamp, R.J., Mater. Sci. Rep. 6 (7, 8) (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Simonton, R. and Sinclair, F., Emerging Ion Implantation Processes for the 1990s, Advanced Ion Implantation Survey Report, Eaton Corporation Report No. 8500208 (1990).Google Scholar
3.Akasaka, Y., NIM B37/38 (North Holland, 1989) p. 9.Google Scholar
4.Kusters, K.H.et al., NIM B55 (North Holland, 1991) p. 9.Google Scholar
5.Hill, C. and Hunt, P., NIM B55 (North Holland, 1991) p. 1.Google Scholar
6.Hofker, W.K., Philips Res. Rep., Supp., No. 8 (1975).Google Scholar
7.Klein, K.M.et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (7) (1991) p. 2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Yu, Ninget al., NIM B59/60 (1991) p. 1061.Google Scholar
9.Park, C., Klein, K.M., Tasch, A.F., Simonton, R.B., and Lux, G., Tech. Digest, IEDM '91, Washington, DC, (December, 1991).Google Scholar
10.Wilson, R.G., J. Appl. Phys. 60 (8) (Oct. 1986) p. 2797; R.G. Wilson, J. Appl. Phys. 52 (6) (1981) p. 3985; J. Comas and R. G. Wilson, J. Appl. Phys. 51 (7) (1980) p. 3697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Davidson, S.M. and Booker, G.R., in First International Conference on Implantation, edited by Eisen, F.H. and Chadderton, L.T., (Gordon and Breech, New York, 1971); W.K. Wu and J. Washburn; J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977) p. 3742.Google Scholar
12.Brice, D.K., J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977), p. 101.Google Scholar
13.Pennycook, S.J., in Rapid Thermal Processing, edited by Sedgwick, T.O., Seidel, T.E., Tsaur, B-Y. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 52, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986) p. 37.Google Scholar
14.Michel, A.E., in Rapid Thermal Processing, edited by Sedgwick, T.O., Seidel, T.E., Tsaur, B-Y. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 52, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986) p. 3.Google Scholar
15.Fair, R.B., Impurity Doping Processes in Silicon, edited by Wang, F. (North Holland, New York, 1981) Chapter 7.Google Scholar
16.Jones, S.K., Prussin, S., and Weber, E.R., Appl. Phys. A45 (1988) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Packan, P.A. and Plummer, J.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (1990) p. 1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Maex, K., Hobbs, L., and Eichhammer, W., VLSI Sci. and Technol., edited by Andrews, J.M. and Celler, G.K., (ECS Pennington, NJ, 1991) p. 254.Google Scholar
19.Calder, I.D. and Naem, A.A., in Rapid Thermal Annealing/ Chemical Vapor Deposition and Integrated Processing, edited by Hodul, D., Gelpey, J., Green, M.L., and Seidel, T.E., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 146, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) p. 203.Google Scholar
20. Courtesy, Varian Corporation.Google Scholar
21.Kusters, K.H., Muhlhoff, H.M., and Cerva, H., NIM B55 (North Holland, 1991) p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Praminik, D.et al., Solid State Technol. (May 1984) p. 211.Google Scholar
23.Pfiester, J., et al., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 9 (8) (1988) p. 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Kaga, T.et al., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 35 (12) (1988) p. 2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Tsang, P.et al., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev., ED-29 (1982) p. 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Pfiester, J.et al., IEDM 1987 Tech. Dig., p. 51.Google Scholar
27.Hori, T.et al., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 9 (6) (1988) p. 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Manoliu, J., Semiconductor Int. (April, 1988) p. 90.Google Scholar
29.Fuse, G.et al, IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. ED-34 (2) (1987).Google Scholar
30.Larson, L.A. and Kirby, B.J., in Emerging Semiconductor Technology, edited by Gupta, D.C. and Langer, P.H. (ASTM STP960, ASTM, 1986) p. 119.Google Scholar
31.Current, M.I. and Larson, L.A., in Advanced Applications of Ion Implantation, edited by Current, M.I. and Sadana, D.K., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 147, Pittsburgh, FA, 1989) p. 365.Google Scholar
32.Freeman, J.H., Radiat. Eff. 100 (1986) p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Quin, X.Y.et al., NIM B55 (1991) p. 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar