Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:43:40.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adhesion behavior of polymer networks with tailored mechanical properties using spherical and flat contacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Nishant Lakhera ,
Annalena Graucob ,
Andreas S. Schneider ,
Elmar Kroner ,
Maurizio Micciché ,
Eduard Arzt  and
Carl P. Frick
Nishant Lakhera
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071
Annalena Graucob
Affiliation:
INM—Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Functional Surfaces Group, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
Andreas S. Schneider
Affiliation:
INM—Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Metallic Microstructures Group, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
Elmar Kroner*
Affiliation:
Functional Surfaces Group, INM—Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
Maurizio Micciché
Affiliation:
Functional Surfaces Group, INM—Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
Eduard Arzt
Affiliation:
Functional Surfaces Group, INM—Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany; Metallic Microstructures Group, INM—Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany; and Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
Carl P. Frick
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071
*
Address all correspondence to Elmar Kroner at elmar.kroner@inm-gmbh.de
Get access

Abstract

Four acrylate-based networks were developed such that they possessed similar glass transition temperature (~− 37 °C) but varied in material stiffness at room temperature by an order of magnitude (2–12 MPa). Thermo-mechanical and adhesion testing were performed to investigate the effect of elastic modulus on adhesion profiles of the developed samples. Adhesion experiments with a spherical probe revealed no dependency of the pull-off force on material modulus as predicted by the Johnson, Kendall, and Roberts theory. Results obtained using a flat probe showed that the pull-off force increases linearly with an increase in the material modulus, which matches very well with Kendall's theory.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 73 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Hertz, H.: Over the solid contact of elastic bodies. J. Reine Angew. Math. (J. Pure Appl. Math.) 92, 22 (1882).Google Scholar
2Kendall, K.: Adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 4, 1186 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Johnson, K.L., Kendall, K., and Roberts, A.D.: Surface energy and contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A—Math. Phys. Sci. 324, 301 (1971).Google Scholar
4Kendall, K.: Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 8, 1449 (1975).Google Scholar
5Shull, K.R.: Contact mechanics and the adhesion of soft solids. Mater. Sci. Eng., R, Reports 36, 1 (2002).Google Scholar
6Maugis, D. and Barquins, M.: Fracture mechanics and the adherence of viscoelastic bodies. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 11, 1989 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Crosby, A.J. and Shull, K.R.: Adhesive failure analysis of pressure—sensitive adhesives. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 37, 3455 (2000).Google Scholar
8Luengo, G., Pan, J.M., Heuberger, M., and Israelachvili, J.N.: Temperature and time effects on the “adhesion dynamics” of poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) surfaces. Langmuir 14, 3873 (1998).Google Scholar
9Maugis, D. and Barquins, M.: Adhesive contact of sectionally smooth-ended punches on elastic half-spaces: theory and experiment. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 16, 1843 (2000).Google Scholar
10Lin, Y., Hui, C., and Baney, J.: Viscoelastic contract, work of adhesion and the JKR technique. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32, 2250 (1999).Google Scholar
11Kroner, E., Paretkar, D.R., McMeeking, R.M., and Arzt, E.: Adhesion of flat and structured PDMS samples to spherical and flat probes: a comparative study. J. Adhes. 87, 447 (2011).Google Scholar
12Zhao, B. and Kwon, H.J.: Adhesion of polymers in paper products from the macroscopic to molecular level an overview. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 25, 557 (2011).Google Scholar
13Kroner, E., Blau, J., and Arzt, E.: Note: an adhesion measurement setup for bioinspired fibrillar surfaces using flat probes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 016101 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Frick, C.P., Lakhera, N., and Yakacki, C.M.: Thermo-mechanical Behavior of (Meth) Acrylate Shape-Memory Polymer Networks (Cambridge Univ. Press, MRS Proceedings, 2011), doi:10.1557/opl.2011.913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Lakhera, N., Yakacki, C.M., Nguyen, T.D., and Frick, C.P.: Partially constrained recovery of (meth)acrylate shape-memory polymer networks. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 126, 72 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Yakacki, C.M., Ortega, A.M., Frick, C.P., Lakhera, N., Xiao, R., and Nguyen, T.D.: Unique recovery behavior in amorphous shape-memory polymer networks. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 297, 1160 (2012), DOI: 10.1002/mame.201200275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Lakhera, N., Smith, K.E., and Frick, C.P.: Systematic tailoring of water absorption in photopolymerizable (meth)acrylate networks and its effect on mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. (2012), DOI: 10.1002/app.38371.Google Scholar
18Lakhera, N., Laursen, C.M., Safranski, D.L., and Frick, C.P.: Biodegradable thermoset shape-memory polymer developed from poly(β-amino ester) networks. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 50, 777 (2012).Google Scholar
19Cook, W.D. and Delatyck, O.: Relaxations in transition region of crosslinked polyesters. 2. Glass-transition. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 12, 1925 (1974).Google Scholar
20Owens, D.K. and Wendt, R.C.: Estimation of surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1741 (1969).Google Scholar
21Mather, P.T., Luo, X.F., and Rousseau, I.A.: Shape memory polymer research. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 39, 445 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Ortega, A.M., Kasprzak, S.E., Yakacki, C.M., Diani, J., Greenberg, A.R., and Gall, K.: Structure-property relationships in photopolymerizable polymer networks: effect of composition on the crosslinked structure and resulting thermomechanical properties of a (meth)acrylate-based system. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 110, 1559 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Kroner, E., Maboudian, R., and Arzt, E.: Adhesion characteristics of PDMS surfaces during repeated pull-off force measurements. Adv. Eng. Mater. 12, 398 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar