Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:49:20.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An overview of simple basic equations used in HLW glass dissolution modeling: consequences for long term leaching and element profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Marc Aertsens
Marc Aertsens*
Affiliation:
Waste and Disposal Department, SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium. maertsen@sckcen.be
Get access

Abstract

Over the last decades, several models describing glass dissolution have been published. Starting from the basic equations in their simplest form, the relationships between models are evaluated to address the following questions: 'What is the relationship between their basic assumptions?, What is the resulting long term leach rate? and, Which element profiles do they allow one to predict?' Although not part of it, this paper could complement the European project GLAMOR, where two models describing the dissolution of glass in a water solution, the r(t) and the GM models, are used by several groups to fit the same sets of experimental data. In this paper, other models are considered as well and all models are compared with each other.

From comparison with the Boksay model, which uses the same equations, a simplification is suggested for the GM model concerning the water diffusion in the glass. The use of the numerical code developed to solve part of it, can mostly be avoided by using the analytical solution of the Boksay model.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 932: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX , 2006 , 82.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Iseghem, P. Van et Al, Glamor final Report, to be published by the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
2. Bourcier, W., “Critical review of glass performance modeling” (ANL report 94/17, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,1994).Google Scholar
3. , Boksay, Bouquet, G., Dobos, S., Phys. Chem. Glasses 9 (1968) 69.Google Scholar
4. Melling, P., Allnatt, A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 42, 553 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Beliustin, A., Ivanovskaja, I., “Generalized description of glass leaching based on conception of ion interdiffusion enhanced by network hydrolysis”, Proc. of 15th Int. Congress on Glass, Leningrad, Vol. 2A (1989) pp. 136–141.Google Scholar
6. Antropova, T., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 345–346, 270 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Ribet, I., Gin, S., Minet, Y., Vernaz, E., Chaix, P., Quang, R. Do, “Long-term behaviour of nuclear glass: the r(t) operational model”, Global (Paris, 9-13 september 2001).Google Scholar
8. Grambow, B., Müller, R., J. Nucl. Mat. 298, 112 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Lemmens, K., J. Nucl. Mat. 298, 11 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Aertsens, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 556 (1999) pp. 409–419.Google Scholar
11. Aagaard, P., Helgeson, H., American J. of Science 282, 237 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Grambow, B., “Nuclear waste glass dissolution : mechanism, model and application. Report to the JSS-project 87-02, phase IV”, 102 pages (1987).Google Scholar
13. Delage, F., Ghaleb, D., Dussossoy, J., Chevallier, O., Vernaz, E., J. Nucl. Mat. 190, 191 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Aertsens, M., Lemmens, K., Iseghem, P. Van, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 757 (2003) pp. 167–174.Google Scholar
15. Pescatore, C., Radiochimica Acta 66/67, 439 (1994).Google Scholar
16. Zavoshy, S., Chambre, P., Pigford, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 44, (1985) pp. 311–322.Google Scholar
17. Aertsens, M., Iseghem, P. Van, Proc. of the ENS meeting (Antwerpen, ISBN-3-9520691-40, 1999), pp. 339–343.Google Scholar
18. Maillard, S. S., , Iracane, D., Noté Technique NT SESD N° 96.33 F.A. 6858 (CEA, Fontenayaux-Roses, France, 1996); and S. Maillard, D. Iracane, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 506 (1998), pp. 231-238.Google Scholar