Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:44:03.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anisotropic Magnetoresistance of Stretched Sheets of Carbon Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Elena Cimpoiasu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21412, U.S.A.
David Lashmore
Affiliation:
Nanocomp Technologies Inc., Concord, NH 03301, U.S.A.
Brian White
Affiliation:
Nanocomp Technologies Inc., Concord, NH 03301, U.S.A.
George A. Levin
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We performed magnetoresistance (MR) measurements on bulk carbon nanotube sheets that had been partially aligned by post-fabrication stretching. The magnetic field was applied under different orientations with respect to the direction of the stretch, while the electric current was either parallel or perpendicular to the direction of the stretch. We found that the fielddependence of the MR is composed of two terms, one positive and one negative. The magnitudes of both terms are largest when the field is parallel with the direction of the stretch. If the sheets are treated with nitric acid, the positive term is removed and the MR is smallest when the field is aligned with the magnetic field. We attribute these anisotropic features to magnetoelastic effects induced by the coupling between the magnetic catalyst nanoparticles, the magnetic field, and the network of nanotubes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Meyyappan, M., Carbon Nanotubes: Science and Applications, (CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2005).Google Scholar
2. Cimpoiasu, E., Levin, G.A., White, B., Lashmore, D., submitted to Phys. Rev. B. Google Scholar
3. Schauer, M. W., Lashmore, D., and White, B., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1081, P03 (2008).Google Scholar
4. Chaffee, J., Lashmore, D., Lewis, D., Mann, J., Schauer, M., and White, B., “Direct Synthesis of CNT Yarns and Sheets,” in NSTI Nanotech 2008, Technical Proceedings - Microsystems, Photonics, Sensors, Fluidics, Modeling, and Simulation, ed. Laudon, M. and Romanowicz, B., 3, pp. 118121.Google Scholar
5. Nilmalraj, P.N., Lyons, P. E., De, S., Coleman, J. N., and Boland, J. J., Nanoletters 9, 3890 (2009).Google Scholar
6. Vavro, J., Kikkawa, J. M., and Fischer, J. E., Phy. Rev. B 71, 155410 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Takano, T., Takenobu, T., and Iwasa, Y., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 124709 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Kim, G. T., Choi, E. S., Kim, D. C., Suh, D. S., Park, Y. W., Liu, K., Duesberg, G., and Roth, S., Phys. Rev. B 58, 16064 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Jaiswal, M., Wang, W., Fernando, K. A. S., Sun, Y.-P., and Menon, R., Phys. Rev. B 76, 113401 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Lee, P. A., Ramakrishnan, T. V., Reviews of Modern Physics 57, 287 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Grow, R. J., Wang, Q., Cao, J., Wang, D., and Dai, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 093104 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Li, Z., Dharap, P., Nagarajaiah, S., Barrera, E. V., and Kim, J. D., Advanced Materials 16, 640 (2004).Google Scholar
13. Cullinan, M. A. and Culpepper, M.L., Phys. Rev. B 82, 115428 (2010).Google Scholar
14. Cao, J., Wang, Q., and Dai, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 157601 (2003).Google Scholar