Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-20T00:07:03.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the Effect of Dissolved Organic Ligands on MineralDissolution Rates: an Example from Calcite Dissolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Teri DeMaio
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122 U.S.A.
D. E. Grandstaff
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122 U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Experiments suggest that dissolved organic ligands may primarily modifymineral dissolution rates by three mechanisms: (1) metal-ligand (M-L)complex formation in solution, which increases the degree ofundersaturation, (2) formation of surface M-L complexes that attack thesurface, and (3) formation of surface complexes which passivate or “protect”the surface. Mechanisms (1) and (2) increase the dissolution rate and thethird decreases it compared with organic-free solutions. The types andimportance of these mechanisms may be assessed from plots of dissolutionrate versus degree of undersaturation.

To illustrate this technique, calcite, a common repository cementing andvein-filling mineral, was dissolved at pH 7.8 and 22°C in Na-Ca-HCO3-Cl solutions with low concentrations of threeorganic ligands. Low citrate concentrations (50 μm) increased thedissolution rate consistent with mechanism (1). Oxalate decreased the rate,consistent with mechanism (3). Low phthalate concentration (< 50 μM)decreased calcite dissolution rates; however, higher concentrationsincreased the dissolution rates, which became faster than in inorganicsolutions. Thus, phthalate exhibits both mechanisms (2) and (3) at differentconcentrations. In such cases linear extrapolations of dissolution ratesfrom high organic ligand concentrations may not be valid.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Rogers, R. D., Hamilton, M. A., Veen, R. H., and McConnell, J. W. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, edited by Murphy, W. M. and Knecht, D. A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1996), pp. 475482.Google Scholar
2. Chave, K.E., Science 148, 1723 (1965).Google Scholar
3. Thomas, M. M. and Longo, J. M., in Water-Rock Interaction V (Orkustofnun, Reykjavik, 1986), pp. 573576.Google Scholar
4. Teng, H. and Grandstaff, D. E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, edited by Murphy, W. M. and Knecht, D. A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1996), pp. 249256.Google Scholar
5. Welch, S. A. and Ullman, W. J., in Water-Rock Interaction, edited by Kharaka, Y. K. and Maest, A. S. (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1992), pp. 127132.Google Scholar
6. Grandstaff, D. E., in Rates of Chemical Weathering of Rocks and Minerals, edited by Colman, S. M. and Dethier, D. P. (Academic Press, New York, 1986), pp. 4160.Google Scholar
7. Chou, L., Garrels, R. M., and Wollast, R., Chemical Geology 78, 269 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Berner, R. A. and Morse, J. W., Am. Jour. Science 274, 108, (1974).Google Scholar
9. Sjoberg, E. L. and Rickard, D. T., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 485 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Plummer, L. N. and Wigley, T. M. L., Geology 40, 191 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Ball, J. W. and Norstrom, D. K., Users manual for WATEQ4F, with revised thermodynamic data base and test cases for calculating speciation of major, trace, and redox elements in natural waters. U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Report, 91–183 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Sillén, L. G. and Martell, A. E., Stability Constants (The Chemical Society, London, 1964).Google Scholar
13. Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J., Aquatic Chemistry (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1996)Google Scholar
14. Maclnnis, I. N. and Brantley, S. L., Geology 56, 1113 (1992).Google Scholar