Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:50:00.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cast Co-Cr-Mo Alloy as a Substrate for Porous Coated Prosthetic Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

L. Gustavson ,
T. Crippen ,
J. H. Dumbleton  and
M. Bushelow
L. Gustavson
Affiliation:
Howmedica, Research and Development, 359 Veterans Boulevard, Rutherford, New Jersey 07070
T. Crippen
Affiliation:
Howmedica, Research and Development, 359 Veterans Boulevard, Rutherford, New Jersey 07070
J. H. Dumbleton
Affiliation:
Howmedica, Research and Development, 359 Veterans Boulevard, Rutherford, New Jersey 07070
M. Bushelow
Affiliation:
Howmedica, Research and Development, 359 Veterans Boulevard, Rutherford, New Jersey 07070
Get access

Abstract

The application of metallic porous coatings on hip prostheses stems has increased the need for evaluating the interrelationship of implant design, material properties, and manufacturing process relative to component fatigue resistance.

In testing the PCA®(porous-coated anatomical) hip a three phase approach was followed comparing Vitallium® and Ti-6AI-4V alloys. Material and component fatigue tests were conducted, followed by in vitro stress analysis. The results of these studies are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 110: Symposium M – Biomedical Materials and Devices , 1987 , 553
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mears, D.C., Materials and Orthopaedic Surgery, (The Williams and Wilkin's Co., Baltimore, 1979), p. 12.Google Scholar
2. Standard Specification for Cast Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications. ASTM F 75–82. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1982.Google Scholar
3. Howmedica data (unpublished).Google Scholar
4. Pilliar, R.M., J. Biomed. Matl. Res: Applied Biomatl. 21-Al, 1–33, (1987).Google Scholar
5. Yue, S., J. Biomed. Matl. Res. 18, 1055 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Gessinger, G.H. in Proceedings of Fourth Int'l. Conf. on Ti, 1787–1795 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Koster, W.P., AFML-Tech Report 70–11: 70, 94 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Williams, D.N., MCIC Report 71–01, (MCIC Batelle Columbus, O., 1971), p. 54–65.Google Scholar
9. Wood, R.A., Titanium Alloys Handbook, Handbook, MCIC-HB-02, (MCIC, Batelle Columbus, O., 1971) p. 23–29.Google Scholar
10. Recommended Practice for the Constant Force Amplitude Fatigue Testing of Stemmed Femoral Components Used in Hip Arthroplasty, Phila.: American Society for Testing and Materials (unpublished draft).Google Scholar
11. Paul, J.P., Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 192, 163–172 (1976).Google Scholar