Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:15:14.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Change of Ms Temperatures and its Correlation to Atomic Configurations of Offstoichiometric NiTi-Cr and NiTi-Co Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Hideki Hosoda
Affiliation:
Now wilh Institute for Materials, Tohoku University, 2–1–1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980–77, Japan.
Toshihiko Fukul
Affiliation:
Now with NKK Cooperation, Minamiwatarida, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210, Japan
Kanryu Inoue
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195–2120, USA
Yoshlnao Mishima
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4249 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226, Japan
Tomoo Suzuki
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Tokyo Institute of Technology, O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

Effects of compositional deviation from the stoichiometry and Cr and Co additions on martensitic-transformation-slart and auslenite-start temperatures (Ms and As) of offstoichiometric NiTi alloys are investigated. Ms and As are determined using conventional differential thermal analysis (DTA), where the temperature range investigated is between 77K and 423K. Alloys are widely chosen with both Ni- and Ti-rich compositions, to which ternary elements, Cr and Co, are added. It is clearly shown that Ms and As in single phase regions are reduced with increasing amount of constituent element, Ni, and ternary elements, Cr and Co. On the other hand, Ms and As do not depend on Ti concentration when Ti concentration is more than 52mol.%. NiTi alloys are in two phase region in the case. Ms changes by Co at offstoichiometry are evaluated to be -15K / mol.% in Ni poor side and -30K / mol.% in Ni rich side. These values correspond to -22K / mol.% for the stoichiometric NiTi alloys. Also, effects of Cr on Ms are evaluated to be -65K / mol.% in Ni poor side and -45K / mol.% in Ni rich side. The former is similar to the Ms change in stoichiometric alloys, and the latter is close to our prediction of -30K / mol.% in comparison with the reported value of -120K / mol.% for stoichiometric alloys. It is concluded for offstoichiometric NiTi alloys that effects of ternary additions on Ms can be explained using electronic structures of ternary elements by taking atomic configurations into account, as well as the stoichiometric NiTi alloys. Effect of degree of order is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hosoda, H., Inoue, K., Enami, K. and Kamio, A., J. Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 7, 312 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Olsuka, K. and Wayman, C. M., in Reviews on Deformation Behavior of Metals, ed. by Feltham, P., 2, 81 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Hosoda, H., Mishima, Y. and Suzuki, T., in Intermetallic Compounds, ed. by Izumi, O., (Proc. Sixth JIM Intl. Symp. (JIMIS-6), Japan Institute of Metals, Sendai, Japan, 1991) p. 81.Google Scholar
4. Hosoda, H., Inoue, K. and Mishima, Y., in High Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Allovs VI, ed. by Horton, J. A., Baker, I., Hanada, S., Noebe, R. D. and Schwartz, D. S., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 364, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995)p. 437.Google Scholar
5. Hosoda, H., Inoue, K. and Mishima, Y., Gamma Titanium Aluminides, ed. by Kim, Y-W., Wagner, R. and Yamaguchi, M. (Proc. Intl. Symp. Gamma Titanium Aluminides (ISGTA’ 95), TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1995) p. 361.Google Scholar
6. Pascoe, R. T. and A Newey, C. W., Met. Sci. J., 2, 138 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Hosoda, H., Mizuuchi, K. and Inoue, K., in Proc. Intl. Svmp. Microsystems. Intelligent Materials and Robots, ed. by Tani, J. and Sashi, M., (7th Sendai Intl. Symp., Sendai, Japan, 1995) p. 231.Google Scholar
8. Nishida, M. and Honma, T., J. de Phys., 43, C422 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Hwang, C. M., Meichle, M., Salmon, M. B. and Wayman, C. M., Phil. Mag., 47, 9 (1983); 47, 117 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Murray, J. L., in Binary Alloy Phase Diagram, ed. by Massalski, T. B., Murray, J. L., Benett, L. H. and Baker, H., (2, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986) p. 1763.Google Scholar
11. Hoiima, T., Matsumoto, M., Shugo, Y., Nishida, M. and Yamazaki, I., in TITANIUM'80 Science and Technology, ed. by Kimura, T. and Izumi, O., (2, Proc. 4th Inti. Conf. Ti, TMS-ASM, Warrendale, PA, 1980) p. 1455.Google Scholar
12. Hosoda, H., Kamio, A., Suzuki, T. and Mishima, Y., J. Japan Inst. Metals, 60, 793 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Nakla, Y., Tadaki, T. and Shimizu, K., Mat. Trans. JIM., 33, 1120 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Buehler, W. J. and Wiley, R. C., Trans. ASM, 55, 269 (1962).Google Scholar
15. Suzuki, T., J. Japan Inst. Metals, 34, 337 (1970).Google Scholar
16. Saburi, T., Tatsumi, T. and Nenno, S., J. de Phys., 43, c4261 (1982).Google Scholar