Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:29:25.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Data Mining Approach to Ab-Initio Prediction of Crystal Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Dane Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Gerbrand Ceder
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Stefano Curtarolo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
Get access

Abstract

Predicting crystal structure is one of the most fundamental problems in materials science and a key early step in computational materials design. Ab initio simulation methods are a powerful tool for predicting crystal structure, but are too slow to explore the extremely large space of possible structures for new alloys. Here we describe ongoing work on a novel method (Data Mining of Quantum Calculations, or DMQC) that applies data mining techniques to existing ab initio data in order to increase the efficiency of crystal structure prediction for new alloys. We find about a factor of three speedup in ab intio prediction of crystal structures using DMQC as compared to naïve random guessing. This study represents an extension of work done by Curtarolo, et al. [1] to a larger library of data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Curtarolo, S., Morgan, D., Persson, K., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Villars, P., in Intermetallic Compounds, Principle and Practice, edited by Westbrook, J. H. and Fleischer, R. L. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994), Vol. 1, Chapter 11, p. 227.Google Scholar
3. Morgan, D., Rodgers, J., and Ceder, G., J. Phys.-Condes. Matter 15, 4361 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Woodley, S. M., Battle, P. D., Gale, J. D., et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 2535 (1999).Google Scholar
5. de Fontaine, D., in Solid State Physics, edited by Ehrenreich, H. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, 1994), Vol. 47, p. 33.Google Scholar
6. Johannesson, G. H., Bligaard, T., Ruban, A. V., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, art. no. (2002).Google Scholar
7. Curtarolo, S., Coarse-Graining and Data Mining Approaches to the Prediction of Structures and their Dynamics, PhD. Thesis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2003).Google Scholar
8. Perdew, J. P. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Comput. Mat. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Wold, S., Ruhe, A., , W. H., et al., SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 5, 735 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Kramer, R., Chemometric Techniques for Quantitative Analysis (Dekker, New York, 1998).Google Scholar
12. Jong, S. d., Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 18, 251 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Jackson, J. E., A User′s Guide to Principal Components (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991).Google Scholar