Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:34:17.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dehydration of Protein Polymers in Concentrated Nematic Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Reinhard Hentschke
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110, USA
Judith Herzfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110, USA
Get access

Abstract

Protein fibers (e.g., actin filaments, microtubules, and sickle cell hemoglobin polymers), formed by reversible association of quasispherical protein monomers, contain substantial solvent. At high concentrations, solutions of these fibers become non-ideal due to interactions between the elongated particles. One manifestation of this non-ideality is the spontaneous alignment of the fibers. Model calculations, involving simple intra- and inter aggregate interactions leading to polymerization and alignment, agree well with osmotic pressure measurements of sickle cell hemoglobin solutions in the region of the phase transition. However, at higher concentrations the theory cannot fit the experimental data unless solvent is gradually squeezed out of the fiber under osmotic stress. We find that a linear potential for the fiber dehydration gives osmotic pressure results consistent with the experimental data. Under these conditions, substantial fiber dehydration occurs with increasing protein concentrations beyond the alignment transition. This indicates that particle interactions sufficient to cause alignment are also sufficient to squeeze significant amounts of solvent out of the sickle cell hemoglobin fibers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Herzfeld, J. and Taylor, M.P., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2780 (1988)Google Scholar
2. Hentschke, R. and Herzfeld, J., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5094 (1989)Google Scholar
3. Taylor, M.P., Berger, A.E., and Herzfeld, J., J. Chem. Phys. 91, 528 (1989)Google Scholar
4. Taylor, M.P. and Herzfeld, J., submitted to LangmuirGoogle Scholar
5. Hentschke, R. and Herzfeld, J., J. Chem. Phys. (in press)Google Scholar
6. Odijk, T., J. Phys. 48, 125 (1987)Google Scholar
7. Prouty, M.S., Schechter, A.N., and Parsegian, V.A., J. Mol. Biol. 184, 517 (1985)Google Scholar
8. Ross, P.D., Hofrichter, J., and Eaton, W.A., J. Mol. Biol. 115, 111 (1977)Google Scholar
9. Herzfeld, J., I. Chem. Phys. 88, 2776 (1988)Google Scholar
10. Hentschke, R. and Herzfeld, J., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 34, 827 (1989)Google Scholar
11. Cotter, M.A. and Wacker, D.C., Phys. Rev. A 18, 2669 (1978)Google Scholar
12. Hentschke, R. and Herzfeld, J., in preparationGoogle Scholar
13. Hentschke, R. and Herzfeld, J., in preparationGoogle Scholar
14. Ross, P.D. and Minton, A.P., J. Mol. Biol. 112, 437 (1977)Google Scholar
15. Gibbons, R.M., Mol. Phys..17, 81 (1969)Google Scholar
16. Dickerson, R.E. and Geis, I., Hemoglobin (Benjamin, New York, 1983)Google Scholar
17. Podgornik, R., Rau, D.C., and Parsegian, V.A., Macromolecules 22, 1780 (1989)Google Scholar