Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:21:09.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Nanomaterial Energy Levels for Organic Photovoltaics by Cyclic Voltammetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Robert Ann DiLeo
Affiliation:
rad0468@rit.edu, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Annick Anctil
Affiliation:
axa9518@rit.edu, Rochester Institute of Technology, Microsystems Engineering, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Brian Landi
Affiliation:
bjlsps@rit.edu, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Cory Cress
Affiliation:
cory_cress@hotmail.com, Rochester Institute of Technology, Microsystems Engineering, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Ryne P Raffaelle
Affiliation:
rprsps@rit.edu, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, United States
Get access

Abstract

A wide variety of nanomaterials and associated nanomaterial/polymer composites are being developed in an effort to produce higher efficiency organic solar cells. This development requires a fundamental understanding of the energy levels for the individual materials, and their composites, to enable device designs which posess appropriate energy level matching. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) allows for the determination of the band gaps (Eg) and energy levels of these various nanomaterials and composites by measuring their oxidation and reduction potentials. These potentials correspond to a given material's ionization potential (IP) and electron affinity (EA), respectively. The results for the EA, IP, and Eg have been determined by CV for derivatized fullerenes and CdSe quantum dots (QD), measured in isolation, and in conjugated polymer composites with MEH-PPV. In addition, CV measurements conducted under dark and illuminated conditions were used to investigate the relationship between energy levels within the composites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Forrest, S.R., MRS Bulletin, 2005. 30: p. 2832.10.1557/mrs2005.5Google Scholar
2. Koster, L.J.A. et al. , Physical Review B, 2005. 72: p. 085205–1.10.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205Google Scholar
3. Lemaur, V. et al. , Journal of American Chemical Society, 2005. 127: p. 6077–86.10.1021/ja042390lGoogle Scholar
4. Kucur, E. et al. , Journal of Chemical Physics, 2003. 119(4): p. 23332337.Google Scholar
5. Zhang, H. et al. , Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2005. 100: p. 36343640.10.1002/app.23156Google Scholar
6. Holt, A.L., Leger, J.M., and Carter, S.A., Journal of Chemical Physics, 2005. 123: p. 044704–1.Google Scholar
7. Kim, J.H. and Lee, H., Chemical Materials, 2002. 14: p. 22702275.10.1021/cm011553rGoogle Scholar
8. Richter, M.M. et al. , Chemical Physics Letters, 1994. 226: p. 115120.10.1016/0009-2614(94)00716-0Google Scholar
9. Ding, H. et al. , Electrochemistry Communications, 2002. 4: p. 503505.10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00359-4Google Scholar
10. Kucur, E. et al. , Journal of Chemical Physics, 2004. 120: p. 15001505.10.1063/1.1632891Google Scholar
11. Sonar, P. et al. , Materials Research Bulletin, 2006. 41: p. 198208.10.1016/j.materresbull.2005.07.032Google Scholar
12. Landi, B.J. et al. , Materials Letters, 2006. 60: p. 35023506.10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.057Google Scholar
13. Yu, W.W. et al. , Chemistry of Materials, 2003. 15: p. 28542860.Google Scholar
14. Backer, S.A. et al. , Chemical Materials, 2007. 19: p. 29272929.10.1021/cm070893vGoogle Scholar
15. Benson-Smith, J.J. et al. , Advanced Functional Materials, 2007. 17: p. 451457.10.1002/adfm.200600484Google Scholar
16. Kooistra, F.B. et al. , Organic Letters, 2006. 9: p. 551554.Google Scholar
17. Zheng, L. et al. , Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004. 108: p. 1192111926.10.1021/jp048890iGoogle Scholar