Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:14:31.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Determination of Grain Boundary Atomic Structure in SrTiO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M.M. McGibbon
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6031, USA
N.D. Browning
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6031, USA
A.J. McGibbon
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6031, USA
M.F. Chisholm
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6031, USA
S.J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6031, USA
Get access

Abstract

In the electroceramic SrTiO3 the grain boundary atomic structure governs a variety of electrical properties such as non-linear I-V characteristics. An understanding of this atomic structure-property relationship for individual grain boundaries requires a technique which probes both composition and chemical bonding on an atomic scale. Atomic structure models for [001] tilt boundaries in SrTiO3 bicrystals have been determined directly from experimental data, by combining high-resolution Z-contrast imaging to locate the cation columns at the boundary, with simultaneous electron energy loss spectroscopy to examine light element coordination at atomic resolution. In this paper we compare and contrast the grain boundary structure models of symmetric and asymmetric boundaries in SrTiO3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McGibbon, M.M., Science, 266, 102 (1994)Google Scholar
2. Gull, S. F. and Skilling, J., lEE Proc. 131F, 646 (1984).Google Scholar
3. McGibbon, A.J. and Pennycook, S.J. in Proceedings of the 52nd Microscopy Society of America Conference, New Orleans, LA, 31st July to 5th August 1994 (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, CA, 1994)Google Scholar
4. McGibbon, M. M. et al. Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc., 341, 148 (1994)Google Scholar
5. Brydson, R., Sauer, H., Engel, W. in Transmission Electron Energy Loss Spectrometry in Materials Science (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1992), pp. 131154.Google Scholar
6. Paterson, J. H. and Krivanek, O. L., Ultramicroscopy 32, 319 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Otten, M. T., Miner, B., Rask, J. H., Busek, P. R., Ultramicroscopy 18, 285, (1985).Google Scholar
8. Brydson, R., Sauer, H., Engel, W., Hofer, F., J. Phys: Condens. Matter 4, 3429 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Altermatt, D. and Brown, I. D., Acta Cryst. B41, 240 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Brown, I. D. and Altermatt, D., Acta Cryst. B41, 244 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Merkle, K. L. and Smith, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2887 (1987)Google Scholar
12. Fonda, R. W. and Luzzi, D. E., Phil.Mag. A 68, 1151 (1993)Google Scholar
13. Browning, N.D., Pennycook, S.J., Chisholm, M.F., McGibbon, A.J. and McGibbon, M.M., Interface Science (in press).Google Scholar
14. We would like to thank Estes, T. C. and Luck, J. T. for technical assistance. This research was sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, US Department of Energy, under contract No. DE-AC05-84OR21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., and supported in part by an appointment to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.Google Scholar