Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:18:58.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dissociation of Sessile Superdislocations at a Coherent Twin Eoundary in Ordered CU3AU During Plastic Deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

F.D. Tichelaar  and
F.W. Schapink
F.D. Tichelaar
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Metallurgy, Delft University of Technology, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
F.W. Schapink
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Metallurgy, Delft University of Technology, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The glide behaviour of superdislocations at a coherent twin boundary in ordered Cu3Au was examined in a transmission electron microscope for the case when the superdislocations are sessile in the boundary. Possible schemes for dissociation of a superdislocation in the boundary were analysed geometrically. The leading superpartial of each superdislocation dissociated into a superpartial in the matrix and a residual Shockley partial in the boundary of glissile type. The trailing superpartial remained undissociated in the boundary. The superpartial in the matrix glided on a cube plane, and a ribbon of APB connected to the boundary was left in its trail. The cube slip occurs as a result of (i) a maximal resolved shear stress for the observed slip system and (ii) the geometric criteria for slip applied to all possible slip systems in the matrix. The Schmid factors for the slip systems in the matrix could be calculated by assuming a uniform tensile axis in the foil. The tensile axis was deduced from the observed slip systems in the twin.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 186: Symposium I – Alloy Phase Stability and Design , 1990 , 295
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

1. Pope, D.P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 81, 3, (1987).Google Scholar
2. Baker, I., Schulson, E.M., and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall. 35, 1533, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Schulson, E.M., Weihs, T.P., Baker, I., Frost, H.J., and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall. 34, 1395, (1986).Google Scholar
4. Bond, G.M., Robertson, I.M., and Bimbaum, H.K., J. Mater. Res. 2 436 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Bond, G.M., Robertson, I.M., and Bimbaum, H.K., Acta Metall. 37 1407 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Brown, G.T., Smallman, R.E., and Morris, D.G., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 62, 509, (1980).Google Scholar
7. Tichelaar, F.D. and Schapink, F.W., Phil. Mag. A, in press (1990a).Google Scholar
8. Tichelaar, F.D. and Schapink, F.W., Phil. Mag. A 54, L55 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Tichelaar, F.D. and Schapink, F.W., Phil. Mag. A, in press (1990b).Google Scholar
10. Shen, Z., Wagoner, R.H., and Clark, W.A.T., Acta Metall. 36, 3231 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Lee, T.C., Robertson, I.M., and Bimbaum, H.K., Scr. Metall. 23, 799, (1989).Google Scholar
12. Baker, I. and Schulson, E.M., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a). 89, 163, (1985).Google Scholar
13. Mikkola, D.E., and Cohen, J.B., Acta Metall. 14, 105, (1966).Google Scholar
14. Kuramoto, E., and Pope, D.P., Phil. Mag. 34, 593, (1976).Google Scholar