Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:21:52.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dry Etching of MRAM Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

S.J. Pearton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
H. Cho
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
K.B. Jung
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center San Jose, CA 95120
J.R. Childress
Affiliation:
IBM Almaden Research Center San Jose, CA 95120
F. Sharifi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
J. Marburger
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access

Abstract

A wide variety of GMR and CMR materials have been patterned by high density plasma etching in both corrosive (Cl2-based) and non-corrosive (CO/NH3) plasma chemistries. The former produce much higher etch rates but require careful in-situ or ex-situ, post-etch cleaning to prevent corrosion of the metallic multilayers. The former may have application for shallow etching of NiFe-based structures, but there is little chemical contribution to the etch mechanism and mask erosion can be a problem. The magnetic performance of patterned MRAM elements is stable over long periods (>1 year) after etching in Cl2 plasmas, provided a suitable cleaning protocol is followed. It is also clear that high ion energies during patterning of magnetic materials can have a significant influence on their coercivity. The effects of ion energy, ion flux and process temperature are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. see, for example, IBM J. Res. Develop. 42, 3116 (1998).10.1147/rd.421.0003Google Scholar
2. Russek, S.E., Oti, J.O., Kaka, S. and Chen, E.Y., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4773 (199).10.1063/1.370477Google Scholar
3. Delft, F.C.M.J. van, J. Magn. Mag. Mater. 140–144, 2203 (1995).10.1016/0304-8853(94)00574-5Google Scholar
4. Fischl, D.S. and Hess, D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 1577 (1988).10.1116/1.584218Google Scholar
5. Kinoshita, K., Yamada, K. and Matutera, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 4888 (19991).10.1109/20.278980Google Scholar
6. Jung, K.B., Lambers, E.S., Childress, J.R., Pearton, S.J., Jenson, M. and Hurst, A.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1255 (1997).10.1063/1.119925Google Scholar
7. Jung, K.B., Hong, J., Cho, H., Caballero, J.A., Childress, J.R., Pearton, S.J., Jenson, M. and Hurst, A.T., Appl. Surf. Sci. 138/139, 111 (1999).10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00417-6Google Scholar
8. Nakatani, I., IEEE Trans Mag. 32, 4448 (1996).10.1109/20.538896Google Scholar
9. Gokan, H. and Eho, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 23 (1981).10.1116/1.570693Google Scholar
10. Balooch, M., Fischl, D.S., Olander, D.R. and Siekhaus, W.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 2090 (1988).10.1149/1.2096215Google Scholar
11. Hess, D.W., Plasma Chem. Plasma Proc. 2, 141 (1982).10.1007/BF00633130Google Scholar
12. Vasile, M.J. and Mogab, C.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 1841 (1986).10.1116/1.573775Google Scholar
13. see, for example, Oehrlein, G.S. and Kurogi, Y., Mat. Sci. Eng. R24, 853 (1998).Google Scholar