Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:36:39.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Stress on Creep of Lamellar Near γ-TiAl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Beddoes
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, KIS 5B6, Canada
J. Triantafillou
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, KIS 5B6, Canada
L. Zhao
Affiliation:
Structures, Materials & Propulsion Lab., National Research Council, Ottawa, K1A 0R6, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The creep behaviour of a binary Ti-48%A1 intermetallic is presented as a function of stress for two fully lamellar microstructures. The two lamellar conditions differ in terms of the lamellar interface spacing and grain boundary morphology. Air cooling (AC) from the single phase a region causes planar grain boundaries and lamellar spacing of 90 to 130 nm, while furnace cooling (FC) causes interlocked lamellae along grain boundaries and 350 to 550 nm lamellar spacing. Monotonie and stress increment creep tests at 760°C indicate that the AC condition exhibits a lower mimimum creep strain rate at stresses between 105 MPa and 290 MPa. The stress exponent increases from ∼ 1 at low stress to ∼ 10 at high stress. Consecutive stress reduction creep tests indicate that the internal stress required for dislocation glide is higher for the AC condition. The results suggest that at low stress the creep rate is controlled by recovery mechanisms, while at high stress the creep rate is predominantly controlled by dislocation glide. It is postulated that at high stresses the lower creep rate of the AC condition, compared to the FC condition, results from the reduced lamellar interface spacing, which increases the internal stress required for dislocation glide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Beddoes, J., Wallace, W. and Zhao, L., Int. Mat. Rev., 40, 197 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Wang, J.N., Schwartz, A.J., Nieh, T.G., Liu, C.T., Sikka, V.K. and Clemens, D., in Gamma Iitanimn_Aluminides, edited by Kim, Y-W., Wagner, R., Yamaguchi, M. (TMS, Warrendale, 1996) pp. 949.Google Scholar
3. Wang, J.N., Schwartz, A.J., Nieh, T.G. and Clemens, D., Mat. Sei. Eng., A206, 63 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Nieh, T.G. and Wang, J.N., Scripta Met. Mater., 33, 1101 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Hofmann, U., Sedláček, R. and Blum, W., Z. Metallkd., 87, 411 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Gibeling, J.C. and Nix, W.D., Mat. Sci. Eng., 45, 123 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Northwood, D.O. and Smith, L.O., Metals Forum, 8, 237 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Triantafillou, J., Beddoes, J. and Wallace, W., Canadian Aeronautics & Space J., 42, 108 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Chen, W.R., Triantafillou, J., Beddoes, J. and Zhao, L., to appear in Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), Dec. (1996).Google Scholar
10. Triantafillou, J., Beddoes, J., Zhao, L. and Wallace, W., Scripta Met. Mater., 31, 1387 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Kimm, D.I. and Wolfenstine, J., Scripta Met. Mater., 30, 615 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Worth, B.D., Jones, J.W. and Allison, J.E., Met. Mat. Trans., 26A, 2947 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Orowan, E., in Symp. on Internal Stress in Metals and Alloys, Institute of Metals, London (1948)p. 451.Google Scholar
14. Martin, P.L. and Lipsitt, H.A., in Proc. Jnt. Conf. on Creep. & Fracture, Institute of Metals, London (1990) p. 255.Google Scholar