Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:12:50.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced response characteristics of SnO2 thin film loaded with nanoscale catalytic clusters for Methane gas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Divya Haridas
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India Keshav Mahavidyalaya, Pitampura, University of Delhi, India
Arijit Chowdhuri
Affiliation:
Acharya Narendra Dev College, Govindpuri, University of Delhi, India
K. Sreenivas
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Vinay Gupta
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Get access

Abstract

In recent years, an increase in usage of methane gas in household and automobile industry has been observed. Detection of methane is always a great cause of concern for safety at home or automobile industries, productions in mines and chemical factories. This paper reports the response characteristics of rf-sputtered SnO2 thin films (90 nm thin) loaded with nanoscale catalytic clusters for detection of methane. Ultrathin (8 nm) metal and metal-oxide catalysts (Pt, Ag, Ni, Pd, Au, NiO, Au2O3) clusters are loaded over the surface SnO2 thin film. The SnO2-Pd cluster structure is found to exhibit an enhanced response (97.2%) for 200 ppm of methane at a relatively low operating temperature (220oC). The enhanced response is shown to be primarily due to the dominant roles played by both Fermi level energy control mechanism and spillover mechanism.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. De Smedt, G., de Corte, F., Notele, R., Berghmans, J., Hazard, J.. Mater. 70, 105 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Haridas, D., Sreenivas, K., Gupta, V., Sens. Actuators B 133, 270 (2008).Google Scholar
3. Yamazoe, N., Kurokawa, Y. and Sciyama, T., Sens. Actuators 4, 283( 1983).Google Scholar
4. Tournier, G., Pijolat, C., Lalauze, R., Patissier, B., Sens. Actuators B 26-27, 24 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Cabot, A., Arbiol, J., Morante, J.R., Weimar, U., Barsan, N., Gopel, W., Sens. Actuators B 70, 87 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Cabot, A., Vila, A., Morante, J.R., Sens. Actuators B 84, 12 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Haridas, D., Chowdhuri, A., Sreenivas, K. and Gupta, Vinay, Sensors and Actuators B (2010) (Article in Press)Google Scholar
8. Haridas, D., Gupta, V., Sreenivas, K., Bulletin of Mat. Sci., 31 (3), 397 (2008).Google Scholar
9. Capeheart, T. W. and Chang, S.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol, 18-2, 393 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Kohl, D., Sensors and Actuators 18, 71 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Kor otcenkov, G., Brinzari, V., Boris, Y., Ivanov, M., Schwank, J., Morante, J., Thin Solid Films 436, 119 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Chang, S. C, Proceedings of International Meeting on Chem Sensory, Fukuoka, 78, (1983).Google Scholar
13. Schierbaum, K.D., Geiger, J., Weimar, U., Göpel, W., Sens. Actuators B 1314, 143 (1993).Google Scholar
14. Fliegel, W., Behr, G., Werner, J., Krabbes, G., Sens. Actuators B 1819, 474 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Papadopoulos, C.A., Vlachos, D.S., Avaritsiotis, J.N., Sensors and Actuators B 32, 61 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Kohi, D., Sensors and Actuators 18, 71 (1989).Google Scholar