Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T19:24:28.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence of re-entrant behavior in laponite-PEO systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Hossein Baghdadi
Affiliation:
hossein@acad.umass.edu, University of Massachusetts - Amherst, Chemical Engineering, 686 North Pleasant St, Amherst, MA, 01002, United States, 413-545-6157
Surita R. Bhatia
Affiliation:
sbhatia@ecs.umass.edu, University of Massachusetts - Amherst, Chemical Engineering, United States
Elizabeth E. C. Jensen
Affiliation:
ejensen2@email.smith.edu, Smith College, Department of Physics, United States
Nalini Easwar
Affiliation:
neaswar@email.smith.edu, Smith College, Department of Physics, United States
Get access

Abstract

Rheology and dynamic light scattering capture re-entrant behavior of laponite-polymer systems. Neat laponite under basics conditions and concentrations of 2wt% or greater forms a viscoelastic soft glass due to electrostatic repulsions. We show that that addition of low molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) melts the glass due to a depletion force. The depletion force speeds up dynamics in the system resulting in a low viscosity solution. A re-entrant viscoelastic solid is formed with the addition of high molecular weight PEO due to the polymer chains bridging between laponite particles. As expected the transition from a low to high viscosity solution scales with the polymer mean square end-to-end distance and gap between laponite particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nelson, A. and Cosgrove, T., Langmuir 20, 10382 (2004)Google Scholar
2. Nelson, A. and Cosgrove, T., Langmuir 20, 2298 (2004)Google Scholar
3. Baghdadi, H. A., Sardinha, H. and Bhatia, S. R., Journal Of Polymer Science Part BPolymer Physics 43, 233 (2005)Google Scholar
4. Eckert, T. and Bartsch, E., Physical Review Letters 89, (2002)Google Scholar
5. Lal, J. and Auvray, L., Journal Of Applied Crystallography 33, 673 (2000)Google Scholar
6. Lal, J. and Auvray, L., Molecular Crystals And Liquid Crystals 356, 503 (2001)Google Scholar
7. Mongondry, P., Nicolai, T. and Tassin, J. F., Journal Of Colloid And Interface Science 275, 191 (2004)Google Scholar
8. Stiakakis, E., Vlassopoulos, D., Likos, C. N., Roovers, J. and Meier, G., Physical Review Letters 89, (2002)Google Scholar
9. Lin-Gibson, S., Schmidt, G., Kim, H., Han, C. C. and Hobbie, E. K., Journal Of Chemical Physics 119, 8080 (2003)Google Scholar
10. Schmidt, G., Nakatani, A. I., Butler, P. D. and Han, C. C., Macromolecules 35, 4725 (2002)Google Scholar
11. Schmidt, G., Nakatani, A. I. and Han, C. C., Rheologica Acta 41, 45 (2002)Google Scholar
12. Schmidt, G., Nakatani, A. I., Butler, P. D., Karim, A. and Han, C. C., Macromolecules 33, 7219 (2000)Google Scholar
13. Pham, K. N., Puertas, A. M., Bergenholtz, J., Egelhaaf, S. U., Moussaid, A., Pusey, P. N., Schofield, A. B., Cates, M. E., Fuchs, M. and Poon, W. C. K., Science 296, 104 (2002)Google Scholar
14. Chen, S. H., Chen, W. R. and Mallamace, F., Science 300, 619 (2003)Google Scholar
15. Grandjean, J. and Mourchid, A., Europhysics Letters 65, 712 (2004)Google Scholar
16. Vanmegen, W. and Underwood, S. M., Physical Review E 49, 4206 (1994)Google Scholar
17. Zaccarelli, E., Foffi, G., Dawson, K. A., Buldyrev, S. V., Sciortino, F. and Tartaglia, P., Physical Review E 66, (2002)Google Scholar
18. Zaccarelli, E., Foffi, G., Dawson, K. A., Sciortino, F. and Tartaglia, P., Physical Review E 6303, (2001)Google Scholar
19. Swenson, J., Smalley, M. V. and Hatharasinghe, H. L. M., Physical Review Letters 81,5840 (1998)Google Scholar
20. Zebrowski, J., Prasad, V., Zhang, W., Walker, L. M. and Weitz, D. A., Colloids And Surfaces A-Physicochemical And Engineering Aspects 213, 189 (2003)Google Scholar