Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:28:18.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fixation of Cesium by Calcium Aluminosilicate Hydrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Susan L. Hoyle
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Michael W. Grutzeck
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Recent work by the authors has demonstrated that cesium was being incorporated in a hydrated phase as their cement-based waste forms cured. The objective of the present study was to identify the hydrated phases responsible for the observed cesium incorporation. Four calcium aluminosilicate glasses having a 1:2 Al2 O3 /CaO ratio and a 25–70 mole % silica content were mixed with ˜0.3 molar CsOH or CsCl solutions (water/solid ratio = 10) and allowed to hydrate at 38° and 90°C for periods up to 90 days. Paste equivalent samples, having a water/solid ratio of 1.0 were also prepared to gauge the cementing properties of these mixtures. Solutions were analyzed for Ca, Al, Si, and Cs while solids were characterized using x-ray powder diffraction and scanning electron microscopy.

Glasses exposed to the CsOH solution were more reactive than their counterparts exposed to the CsCl solution. In addition, reactivity as well as crystallinity seemed to be higher at 90° than at 38°C. At least two cesium-containing zeolites were identified in the 90°C CsOH solution experiment: A cesium-containing wairarkite analogue and possibly another cesium-containing zeolite unidentified at this time. The relatively complete removal of cesium from the solution, in one case, as well as the fact that the mixtures are self-cementing suggests that the glasses may be “engineered” to serve as overpack material in a deep-seated geologic repository.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crawford, R.W., Glasser, F.P., Rahman, A.A., Angus, M.J. and McCulloch, C.E., “Diffusion Mechanisms and Factors Affecting Leaching of Cesium-134 from Cement-based Waste Matrices,” Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle 6., 177196 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Crawford, R.W., McCulloch, C., Angus, M., Glasser, F.P. and Rahman, A.A., “Intrinsic Sorption Potential of Cement 134Cs,” Cement and Concrete Research 14,594599 (1984).Google Scholar
3. McCulloch, C.E., Rahman, A.A., Angus, M.J., Glasser, F.P. and Crawford, R.W., “Immobilization of Cesium in Cement Containing Reactive Silica and Pozzolans,” Advances in Ceramics- Nuclear Waste Management, Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A. (eds.), Vol.8, pp. 113128, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH (1984).Google Scholar
4. Hoyle, S. and Grutzeck, M.W., “Effects of Phase Composition on the Cesium Leachability of Cement-Based Waste Forms,” Waste Management 1986, Proceedings of Waste Isolation; Technical Programs and Public Education, Vol.3, pp. 491–496, University of Arizona (1986).Google Scholar
5. Hoyle, S. and Grutzeck, M.W., “Effect of Pore Solution Composition on Cesium Leachability of Cement Based Waste Forms”, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (eds.), Vol.84, pp. 309317, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA (1987).Google Scholar
6. JCPDS, Joint Committee of Powder Diffraction Standards, 1601 Park Lane, Swarthmore, PA (1985).Google Scholar
7. Diamond, S., “Cement Paste Microstructure–An Overview at Several Levels”, in Hydraulic Cement Pastes: Their Structure and Properties, Cement Concrete Assn., Wexham Springs, England (1976).Google Scholar