Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:41:39.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glassy and Crystalline States in a Model without Disorder: Spin Analog of a Structural Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Lei Gu  and
Bulbul Chakraborty
Lei Gu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254, USA, bulbul@snow.cc.brandeis.edu
Bulbul Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254, USA, bulbul@snow.cc.brandeis.edu
Get access

Abstract

We have analyzed a non-randomly frustrated spin model which exhibits behavior remarkably similar to the phenomenology of structural glasses. The high-temperature disordered phase undergoes a strong first-order transition to a long-range ordered structure. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we have studied the behavior of the supercooled state by quenching to temperatures below this transition temperature. For a range of supercooling, the system remains ergodic and exhibits dynamics characteristic of supercooled liquids. Below a certain characteristic temperature, however, the system freezes into a “glassy” phase. In this phase, the system is non-ergodic and evolves through a distribution of traps characterized by a power-law distribution of trapping times. This change in the dynamic behavior is concurrent with the appearance of a shear instability.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 455: Symposium T – Glasses and Glass Formers–Current Issues , 1996 , 229
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Angell, C.A., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 92, 6675 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Menon, Narayanan and Nagel, Sidney R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1230 (1995) ;Google Scholar
Bitko, D. et al, Europhys. Lett 33, 489 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Bouchaud, J. P. and Mezard, M., J. Phys. I 4, 1109 (1994).Google Scholar
4. For a recent review and simulation studies, see Tomida, T. and Egami, T., Phy. Rev. B 52, 3290 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Kivelson, S. A. et al, J. Chem. Phys 101, 2391 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Chen, Z. Y. and Kardar, M., J. Phys. C 19, 6825 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Gu, Lei, Chakraborty, Bulbul, Garrido, P. L., Phani, Mohan and Lebowitz, J. L., Phys. Rev. B 53, 11985 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Bouchaud, J. P., J. Phys. I 2, 1705 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Thirumalai, D. and Mountain, Raymond D., Phys. Rev. B47, 479 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Krauth, W. and Mezard, M., Z. Phys. B 97, 127 (1995).Google Scholar