Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:18:57.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of Niobium Films at High Temperatures on Sapphire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Wagner*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung Institut für Werkstoffwissenschaft D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The growth and microstructural evolution of Nb thin films on the basal plane of α-Al2O3 were studied at different growth temperatures. The influence of island orientation, density, and misfit strain energy on the growth behavior of Nb films on (0001)α-Al2O3 at high temperatures has been investigated. The films were grown by MBE at 900°C and 1100°C. At these temperatures the Nb grows in the Volmer-Weber growth mode on the basal plane. In-situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations revealed that in the initial growth stage, Nb nuclei with different epitaxial orientations were formed. This leads to different orientations of thicker Nb films at different growth temperatures. At a growth temperature of 900°C the Nb{111} planes are parallel to the sapphire basal plane whereas at 1100°C Nb grows with the {110) planes parallel to the basal plane of sapphire. The formation of two different epitaxial orientations of thick Nb films can only be explained by considering both the change in the total density of Nb islands with temperature and the influence of island size on their total energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Pashley, D.W., The Epitaxy of Metals in Processing of Metals and Alloys, Materials Science and Technology, ed. by Chan, R. W., Haasen, P. and Kramer, E. J. (VCH, Weinheim, 1991) Vol.15, p. 289.Google Scholar
[2] Bauer, E., Z. Kristallogr. 110, 423 (1958).Google Scholar
[3] Venables, J.A., Spiller, G.D.T. and Hanbücken, M., Pep. Prog. Phys. 47, 399 (1984).Google Scholar
[4] Thompson, C.V., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 763 (1985).Google Scholar
[5] Thompson, C.V., Acta Met. 36, 2929 (1988).Google Scholar
[6] Strecker, A., Salzberger, U. and Mayer, J., Prakt. Metallogr. 30, 481 (1993).Google Scholar
[7] Bauer, E., in Techniques for the Direct Observation of Structure and Imperfections ed. by Bunshah, R. F. (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1969) Vol. II Part 2, p. 501.Google Scholar
[8] Mayer, J., Flynn, C.P. and Rühle, M., Ultramicroscopy 33, 51 (1990).Google Scholar
[9] Durbin, S.M., Cunningham, J.E. and Flynn, C.P., J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 12, L75 (1982).Google Scholar
[10] Wagner, T., Lorenz, M. and Rühle, M., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1255 (1996).Google Scholar
[11] Cuomo, J.J. and Angilello, J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 125 (1973).Google Scholar
[12] Gutekunst, G., Mayer, J. and Rühle, M., Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 31, 1097 (1994).Google Scholar
[13] Gutekunst, G., Mayer, J. and Rühle, M., to be published in Phil. Mag.Google Scholar