Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:19:26.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guiding the design and application of new materials for enhancing sustainability performance: Framework and infrastructure application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Gregory Keoleian ,
Alissa M Kendall ,
Michael D Lepech  and
Victor C Li
Gregory Keoleian
Affiliation:
gregak@umich.edu, University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment, 440 Church, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, United States, 734 764 3194, 734 647 5841
Alissa M Kendall
Affiliation:
kendalla@umich.edu, University of Michigan, Center for Sustainable Systems, United States
Michael D Lepech
Affiliation:
mlepech@umich.edu, University of Michigan, Civil and Environmental Engineering, United States
Victor C Li
Affiliation:
vcli@umich.edu, University of Michigan, Civil and Environmental Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for guiding the design of new materials to enhance the sustainability of systems that utilize these materials throughout their production, use and retirement. Traditionally, materials engineering has focused on the interplay between material microstructure, physical properties, processing, and performance. Environmental impacts related to the system’s life cycle are not well integrated into the materials engineering process. To address this shortcoming, a new methodology has been developed that incorporates social, economic, and environmental indicators – the three dimensions of sustainability. The proposed framework accomplishes this task and provides a critical tool for use across a broad class of materials and applications. Material properties strongly shape and control sustainability performance throughout each life cycle stage including materials production, manufacturing, use and end-of-life management. Key material parameters that influence life cycle energy, emissions, and costs are highlighted. The proposed framework is demonstrated in the design of engineered cementitious composites, which are materials being developed for civil infrastructure applications including bridges, roads, pipe and buildings. This research is part of an NSF MUSES (Materials Use: Science, Engineering and Society) Biocomplexity project on sustainable concrete infrastructure materials and systems (http://sci.umich.edu).

Keywords

environmentally benigncompositemicrostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 895: Symposium G – Life-Cycle Analysis Tools for “Green” Materials and Process Selection , 2005 , 0895-G06-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. CSS. 2005 Materials Use Factsheet, Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, http://css.snre.umich.edu/4_2_Factsheets.htm Google Scholar
2. ASCE. 2001. Renewing America's Infrastructure: A Citizen's Guide. American Society of Civil Engineers. Washington, D.C. pp. 43. http://www.asce.org/pdf/citizens_guide.pdf Google Scholar
3. TRIP. 2002. Key Facts About America's Road and Bridge Conditions and Federal Funding. Accessed March 2002 from The Road Information Program (TRIP): http://www.tripnet.org/nationalfactsheet.html Google Scholar
4. van Oss, H. G. and Padovani, A. C.. 2002b. Cement Manufacture and the Environment. Part I:Chemistry and Technology. Journal of Industrial Ecology.6(1): 89–105.Google Scholar
5. UNFPA. 2001. The State of World Population 2001, Chapter 3. Accessed March 2002 from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA): http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2001/english/ch03.html#3 Google Scholar
6. Hendricks, C.A., Worrell, E., Price, L., Martin, N., Meida, L. Ozawa, de Jager, D. and Reimer, P.. 1998. Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Interlaken.Google Scholar
7. Worrell, E., Price, L., Martin, N., Hendriks, C. and Meida, L. Ozawa. 2001. Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annual Reviews of Energy and the Environment. 26: 303–329.Google Scholar
8. WBCSD. 2002. Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry. Draft report for World Business Council on Sustainable Development. Battelle Memorial Institute. http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports/2002/cement.pdf Google Scholar
9. US EPA. 1999. 40 CFR Part 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry; Final Rule. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/pcem/fr14jn99.html Google Scholar
10. US EPA. 2000. Sources of dioxin-like compounds in the United States. Draft exposure and human health reassessment of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. EPA/600/P-00/001 Bb. Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/part1and2.cfm Google Scholar
11. TRIP. 2001. Stuck in Traffic: How Increasing Traffic Congestion is Putting the Brakes on Economic Growth from. Accessed March 2002 from The Road Information Program (TRIP): http://www.tripnet.org/StuckinTrafficReportMay01.PDF Google Scholar
12. Kanda, T. and Li., V.C. 1998. Multiple cracking sequence and saturation in fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Japan Concrete Institute Concrete Research and Technology. 9(2): 19–33.Google Scholar
13. Li, V.C. 1998. Engineered cementitious composites - tailored composites through micromechanical modeling. Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Present and the Future. Eds. Banthia, N., Bentur, A. and Mufti., A. Montreal: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering pp. 64–97. For more info on ECC see: http://www.engin.umich.edu/acemrl/ Google Scholar
14. Li, V.C. 2003. “On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) – A Review of the Material and its Applications,” J. Advanced Concrete Technology, 1(3): 215–230.Google Scholar
15. Ashby, M. 1992 “Material Selection in Mechanical Design” Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford, England. pp. 1–303 Google Scholar
16. ISO. 1997. “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework.” ISO 14040, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
17. Office of Management and Budget (2005) Discount Rates for Cost-Effectiveness, Lease, Purchase and Related Analyses. Appendix C to Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. Report of the Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
18. Weitzman, M. L. (2001) Gamma discounting. American Economic Review, 91, 260–271.Google Scholar
19. Gramlich, E. M. (1990) A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
20. Li, V.C., Fischer, G., Kim, Y., Lepech, M., Qian, S., Weimann, M., and Wang, S. 2003. “Durable link slabs for jointless bridge decks based on strain-hardening cementitious composites.” Project Report to MDOT.Google Scholar
21. Li, V.C. 2003. “On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) – A Review of the Material and its Applications,” J. Advanced Concrete Technology, 1(3): 215–230.Google Scholar
22. Liu, Y. and Weyers, R. 1998 “Modeling the Time-to-Corrosion Cracking in Chloride Contaminated Reinforced Concrete Structures” ACI Materials Journal 95(6) pp. 675–681,Google Scholar
23. Nisbet, M. A., et al. 2002. “Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete:Appendix; Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Manufacture.” Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.Google Scholar
24. Ecobilan, . 2001. “TEAM/DEAM.” Ecobilan, (PriceWaterhouseCoopers), Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
25. IISI. 2000. “Worldwide LCI Database for Steel Industry Products.” International Iron and Steel Institute.Google Scholar
26. KTC. 2002. “The Cost of Construction Delays and Traffic Control for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements.” KTC-02–07/SPR197–99 & SPR218–00–1F, Kentucky Transportation Center (KTC).Google Scholar
27. Kendall, Alissa. 2004. “A Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Comparing Bridge Deck Designs.” Master's Thesis. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
28. Keoleian, G.A., Kendall, A., Dettling, J.E., Smith, V.M., Chandler, R.F., Lepech, M.D. and Li, V.C. 2005. Life Cycle Modeling of Concrete Bridge Design: A Comparison of Engineered Cementitious Composite Link Slabs and Conventional Steel Expansion Joints. Journal of Infrastructure Systems.(2005) 11(1): 51–60.Google Scholar
29. Ravirala, V. and Grivas, D. 1995. “State Increment Method of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Highway Management.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 1(3): 151–9.Google Scholar
30. Ehlen, .A. (1997) Life-Cycle Costs of New Construction Materials. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 3, 129–133.Google Scholar
31. Ehlen, M. A. (1999) Life-cycle Costs of Fiber-Reinforced-Polymer Bridge Decks. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 11, 224–230.Google Scholar
32. Banzhaf, H. S., Desvousges, W. H., et al. (1996). “Assessing the Externalities of Electricity Generation in the Midwest.” Resource and Energy Economics 18, 395–421.Google Scholar
33. Matthews, H. S. and Lave, L. B. (2000). “Applications of Environmental Valuation for Determining Externality Costs.” Environmental Science and Technology, 24(8): 1390–1395.Google Scholar
34. Tol, R. S. J. (1999). “The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” The Energy Journal 20(1): 61–81.Google Scholar
35. U.S. Department of Transportation. “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design – In Search of Better Investment Decisions.” Report No. FHWA-SA-98–079. Pavement Division Interim Technical Bulletin. September 1998.Google Scholar
36. Chandler, Richard. 2004. “Life-Cycle Cost Model for Evaluating the Sustainability of Bridge Decks: A Comparison of Conventional Concrete Joints and Engineered Cementitious Composite Link Slabs.” Master's Thesis. University of Michigan.Google Scholar