Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T14:20:58.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ Dynamic Atomic-Level Investigation of a Weak Charge Transfer Lamellar Intercalation Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

L. Diebolt
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (USA) 85287-1604.
R. Sharma
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (USA) 85287-1704.
M. Mckelvy
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (USA) 85287-1704.
W. S. Glaunsinger
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ (USA) 85287-1604.
Get access

Abstract

Environmental-cell dynamic high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (DHRTEM) has been used to provide atomic-level insight into lamellar reaction processes for the model weak- charge-transfer intercalation reaction of NH3 with 2H-TaS2. In situ intercalation was induced by exposing 2H-TaS2 crystallites to controlled pressures of NH3(g) and recorded on videotape with 0.03 second time resolution. The intercalation processes observed possess a strong similarity to nucleation and growth processes. Onset occurs in either outermost or internal guest galleries, with further intercalation of the galleries progressing away from the onset layers. Randomly staged regions, containing occasional packages of short-range order, were observed to form during the growth process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Intercalation Chemistry, edited by Whittingham, M.S. and Jacobson, A. J. (Academic Press, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
(2) Chemical Physics of Intercalation, edited by Legrand, A.P. and Flandrois, S. (Plenum Press, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
(3) Intercalated Layered Materials, edited by Levy, F. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).Google Scholar
(4) Intercalation in Layered Materials, edited by Dresselhaus, M. S. (Plenum Press, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
(5) Schöllhorn, R. and Zagefka, H. D., Angew. Chem. Int. [Ed. Engl.] 16, 199 (1977).Google Scholar
(6) Grange, P. and Delmon, B., J. Less-Common Met. 36, (1974).Google Scholar
(7) Stupian, G. W. and Cosse, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 13, 684 (1976).Google Scholar
(8) Whittingham, M. S., J. Solid State Chem. 29, 303 (1979).Google Scholar
(9) McKelvy, M., Sidorov, M., Marie, A., Sharma, R., and Glaunsinger, W., Chem. Mater. 6, 2233, (1994).Google Scholar
(10) McKelvy, M., Sharma, R., and Glaunsinger, W., Solid State Ionics 63, 369, (1993).Google Scholar
(11) McKelvy, M. and Glaunsinger, W., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 497 (1990).Google Scholar
(12) Sharma, R., Weiss, K., McKelvy, M., Glaunsinger, W., Proc. 52nd Ann. Meet. Microscopy Society of America, 1994, 494.Google Scholar
(13) Chianelli, R. R., Scanlon, J. C., Whittingham, M. S., and Gamble, F. R., Inorg. Chem. 14, 1691 (1975).Google Scholar
(14) Wang, C., McKelvy, M. and Glaunsinger, W., submitted.Google Scholar
(15) Kirczenow, G., in Graphite Intercalation Compounds I, edited by Zabel, H. and Solin, S.A. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1990), pp. 59100.Google Scholar