Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:34:25.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ STM Observation of the Spiral Growth in the Epitaxial Fe Films on MgO(001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Agus Subagyo
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita-13, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan, agus@nano.eng.hokudai.ac.jp
Kazuhisa Sueoka
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita-13, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan, agus@nano.eng.hokudai.ac.jp
Koichi Mukasa
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita-13, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan, agus@nano.eng.hokudai.ac.jp CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kita-13, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
Get access

Abstract

We reported a scanning tunneling microscopy(STM) observation on the growth mode transition from 2D-nucleation to spiral growth in the epitaxial Fe films on MgO(001). As the growth temperature is increased to above 493 K, a temperature region where the Schwoebel barrier is overcome, the Fe films grow in a 2D-nucleation and growth mode formed atomically flat films. The 2D-nucleation transformed into a spiral growth as increasing film thickness. At a growth temperature of 493 K, the transition of 2D nucleation to the spiral growth was observed at a film thickness of 75 Å. The critical thickness of the emergence of growth transition decreased as the growth temperature is increased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Li, C. and Freeman, A. J., Phys. Rev. B 43, 780 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Dekoster, J., Groote, S. D., Kobayashi, T., and Langouche, G., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 148, 93 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Park, Y., Fullerton, E. E., and Bader, S. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2140 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Huang, Y. Y., Liu, C., and Felcher, G. P., Phys. Rev. B 47, 183 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Durand, O., Childress, J. R., Galtier, P., Bisaro, R., and Schuhl, A., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 145, 111 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Jordan, S. M., Lawler, J. F., Schad, R., and van Kempen, H., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1499 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Lairson, B. M., Visokay, M., Sinclair, R., and Clemens, B. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1390 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Belian, P., Schad, R., Potter, C. D., Verbank, G., Mashchalkov, V. V., and Bruynseraede, Y., Phys. Rev. B 50, 9957 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Hanson, M., Johansson, C., Nilsson, B., Isberg, P., and Wtippling, R., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 2793 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Kim, S. G., Otani, Y., Fukamachi, K., Yuasa, S., Nyvlt, M., and Katayama, T., J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 198–199, 200 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Subagyo, A., Sueoka, K., Mukasa, K., and Hayakawa, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 3820 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Stroscio, J. A., Pierce, D. T., Davis, A., Celotta, R. J., and Weinert, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2960 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Thürmer, K., Koch, R., Weber, M., and Rieder, K. H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1767 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Kanaji, T., Asano, K., and Nagata, S., Vacuum 23, 55 (1973);Google Scholar
Urano, T. and Kanaji, T., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 3403 (1988).Google Scholar
15. Barker, R. A., Estrup, P. J., Jona, F., and Marcus, P. M., Solid State Commun. 25, 375 (1978).Google Scholar
16. Hulpke, E. and Smilgies, D.-M., Phys. Rev. B 40, 1338 (1989).Google Scholar
17. From RHEED observation during growth and STM images, we concluded that the reconstruction emergence is inherently related to the growth process of Fe film itself and emerged at the same time as the forming of an atomically flat surface: Subagyo, A., Sueoka, K., and Mukasa, K., to be published.Google Scholar
18. Bertacco, R., De Rossi, S., and Ciccacci, F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 2277 (1998).Google Scholar
19. Anderson, J. F., Kuhn, M., Diebold, U., Shaw, K., Stoyanov, P., and Lind, D., Phys. Rev. B 56, 9902 (1997).Google Scholar