Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:21:54.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Annealing in H2 Atmosphere on the Electrical Properties of Thin Film CdS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2011

Natalia Maticiuc ,
Jaan Hiie ,
Tamara Potlog ,
Vello Valdna  and
Aleksei Gavrilov
Natalia Maticiuc
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Tallinn University of Technology, 5 Ehitajate tee, Tallinn, 19086, Estonia. Department of Applied Physics and Informatics, Moldova State University, 60 A. Mateevici street, Chisinau, MD 2009, Moldova.
Jaan Hiie
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Tallinn University of Technology, 5 Ehitajate tee, Tallinn, 19086, Estonia.
Tamara Potlog
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics and Informatics, Moldova State University, 60 A. Mateevici street, Chisinau, MD 2009, Moldova.
Vello Valdna
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Tallinn University of Technology, 5 Ehitajate tee, Tallinn, 19086, Estonia.
Aleksei Gavrilov
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Tallinn University of Technology, 5 Ehitajate tee, Tallinn, 19086, Estonia.
Get access

Abstract

Chemical bath-deposited (CBD) thin film CdS has been widely used as a buffer and n-type window layer in CdS/CIGS and CdS/CdTe thin film solar cells. Annealing of CBD CdS assigns to the layers required concentration and mobility of electrons, crystallinity, structural stability and perfect Ohmic front contact in TCO/CdS interface. But always annealing reduces band gap (Eg) of solution-deposited CdS and lowers current density of the CdS/CdTe PV device due to optical absorption within the CdS layer.

We have studied systematically dynamics of changes in CBD CdS/glass thin film structural, optical and electrical properties in annealing process in H2 ambient at normal pressure in pre-heated ceramic tubular furnace. Here we’ll present electrical, characterization results of annealed CBD CdS/glass thin films, 300 nm thick. The films were deposited with thiourea from ammoniacal 1 mM dilute solution of CdSO4 and 0.001 at. % of NH4Cl relative to Cd for Cl doping.

We found high concentration of electrons 1-4 E19 cm-3 in the layers annealed at 200–450 °C, while for 200 °C the long time of annealing over 60 min is needed, but for high temperature region 350–450 °C only for short 10 min annealing this concentration region of electrons was achieved. In the high temperature region rapid decrease of electron concentration and conductivity will go on with increasing annealing temperature and time. Mobility of electrons will decrease from 9 to 5 cm2/V·s in the annealing region 200–350 °C, which is probably connected with disordering of lattice. On the basis of acquired results we propose an hypothesis about substitutional incorporation of OH group on S site in CdS lattice in deposition process and that (OH)s complex defect acts as a donor defect like Cl and we believe that the both defects are responsible for changes of thin film CdS electrical, optical and structural properties in the annealing process. Thermal annealing in hydrogen atmosphere is a convenient and appropriate method for precise control of CdS thin film electrical properties, and also for creation of n/n+ CdS window layers in the substrate configuration of a solar cell.

Keywords

annealingelectrical propertiesII-VI
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1324: Symposium D – Compound Semiconductors for Energy Applications and Environmental Sustainability , 2011 , mrss11-1324-d14-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wu, X., Solar Energy 77, 803–814 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Repins, I., Contreras, M., Romero, M., Yan, Y., Metzger, W., Li, J., Johnston, S., Egaas, B., DeHart, C., Scharf, J., McCandless, B. E. and Noufi, R., PVSC’08 33rd IEEE Proc., 1-6 (2008).Google Scholar
3. Nair, M. T. S., Nair, P. K., Zingaro, R. A. and Meyers, E. A., J.Appl.Phys., 75(3), 1557–1564 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Abou-Ras, D., Kostorz, G., Romeo, A., Rudmann, D. and Tiwari, A.N., Thin Solid Films, 480–481, 118–123 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Dhere, R. G., Duenow, J. N., Duda, A., Glynn, S., Li, J., Metzger, W. K., Moutinho, H. and Gessert, T. A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1165, 1165-M02-08 (2009).Google Scholar
6. Sakurai, T., Ishida, N., Ishizuka, S., Islam, M. M., Kasai, A., Matsubara, K., Sakurai, K., Yamada, A., Akimoto, K. and Niki, S., Thin Solid Films, 516, 7036–7040 (2008).Google Scholar
7. Chung, Y. D., Cho, D. H., Park, N. M., Lee, K. S. and Kim, J., Current Applied Physics, 11, S65–S67 (2011).Google Scholar
8. Maticiuc, N., Potlog, T., Hiie, J., Mikli, V., Põldme, N., Raadik, T., Valdna, V., Mere, A., Gavrilov, A., Quinci, F., Lughi, V. and Sergo, V., Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences, 9(3–4), 275–279 (2010).Google Scholar
9. Hiie, J., Muska, K., Valdna, V., Mikli, V., Taklaja, A. and Gavrilov, A., Thin Solid Films, 516, 7007–7012 (2008).Google Scholar
10. Vasco, E., Puron, E. and de Melo, O., Material Letters, 25, 205–207 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Al Turkestani, M. K. and Durose, K., Sol. Energy Mat. & Solar Cells, 95, 491–496 (2011).Google Scholar
12. HSC Chemistry 4.0, Chemical Reaction and Equilibrium Software with extensive Thermochemical Database (1999).Google Scholar
13. Hiie, J., Quinci, F., Lughi, V., Sergo, V., Valdna, V., Mikli, V., Kärber, E. and Raadik, T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1165, 1165-M08-17 (2009).Google Scholar
14. Kylner, A., Rockett, A. and Stolt, L., Sol.Stat. Phenom., 51–52, 533–540 (1996).Google Scholar