Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:08:45.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of catalyzer area and design on the growth of intrinsic hot-wire CVD thin-film silicon for photovoltaic applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Markus Kupich
Affiliation:
University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Physics / Center of Optical Technologies and Laser Controlled Processes, P.O. Box 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern email: kupich@rhrk.uni-kl.de
Dmitry Grunsky
Affiliation:
University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Physics / Center of Optical Technologies and Laser Controlled Processes, P.O. Box 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern email: kupich@rhrk.uni-kl.de
Bernd Hofferberth
Affiliation:
University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Physics / Center of Optical Technologies and Laser Controlled Processes, P.O. Box 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern email: kupich@rhrk.uni-kl.de
Bernd Schröder
Affiliation:
University of Kaiserslautern, Department of Physics / Center of Optical Technologies and Laser Controlled Processes, P.O. Box 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern email: kupich@rhrk.uni-kl.de
Get access

Abstract

Recently, hot-wire deposited microcrystalline silicon has attracted increasing attention. The use of hot-wire deposited intrinsic μc-Si:H for high efficiency solar cells was demonstrated by Klein et al. [1]. Integration of high-quality intrinsic μc-Si:H into all-hot-wire nip solar cells, prepared close to the transition to amorphous growth using a tantalum catalyzer, resulted in initial and stable efficiencies of 5.4 % on simple stainless steel substrates [2]. However, the deposition rates for the absorber material in both cases remained low, at values around 1 Å/s.

In the present study we report on the dependence of deposition rate and material quality on the design and area of the tantalum catalyzer. It was found that different filament geometries require considerable changes in certain deposition conditions to optimize material properties. So, for example, enlarging the catalyzer surface made it necessary to decrease the hydrogen dilution of the process gas, in order to obtain the desired microcrystalline material close to the phase transition. These changes might be understood in terms of alterations of the gas decomposition relations on the catalyzer surface. For these modified conditions, deposition rates in the range of 2.5-10 Å/s could be achieved for μc-Si:H due to the fact that a higher silane fraction of the process gas could be used. For different wire geometries, the optimized intrinsic layers were incorporated into solar cells. Using a catalyzer with modified geometry and enlarged surface area, conversion efficiencies of ν = 4.4 % could be achieved for all-μc-Si:H, all-HWCVD solar cells at a rate of about 3 Å/s.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Klein, S., Finger, F., Carius, R., Dylla, T., Rech, B., Grimm, M., Houben, L., Stutzmann, M., Thin Solid Films 430 (2003), 202207.Google Scholar
2 Kupich, M., Grunsky, D., Kumar, P., Schröder, B., Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 81 (2004) 141146.Google Scholar
3 Mahan, A.H., Xu, Y., Iwaniczko, E., Williamson, D.L., Nelson, B.P., Wang, Q., Q.; J. NonCrystalline Solids 299–302 (2002) 2 Google Scholar
4 Nelson, B.P., Xu, Y., Mahan, A.H., Williamson, D.L., Crandall, R.S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 609 (2000) A22.8 Google Scholar
5 Rath, J.K., Hardeman, A.J., Werf, C.H.M. vam der, Veenendaal, P.A.T.T. van, Rusche, M.Y.S., Schropp, R.E.I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 762 (2003) A6.7 Google Scholar
6 Iwaniczko, E., Xu, Y., Schropp, R.E.I., Mahan, A.H., Thin Solid Films 430 (2003), 212215 Google Scholar
7 Weber, U., Koob, M., Dusane, R.O., Mukherjee, C., Seitz, H., Schröder, B., in: Proceedings of the 16th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Glasgow, UK, May 1-5 (2000), p. 115.Google Scholar
8 Rath, J.K., Tichelaar, F.D., Schropp, R.E.I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 557 (1999) 573 Google Scholar
9 Doyle, J., Robertson, R., Lin, G.H., He, M.Z., Gallagher, A., J. Appl. Phys. 64 (1988) 3215 Google Scholar
10 Klein, S., Finger, F., Carius, R., Kluth, O., Neto, L.B., Wagner, H., Stutzmann, M., in: Proceedings of the 17th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, October 22-26, (2001), p. 2965.Google Scholar
11 Masuda, A., Ishibashi, Y., Matsumura, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 609 (2000) A6.3 Google Scholar