Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:36:11.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence Of Curing On Surface Characteristics Of Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. Sadegzadeh
Affiliation:
Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, England
R. J. Kettle
Affiliation:
Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, England
C. L. Page
Affiliation:
Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, England
Get access

Abstract

An experimental assessment is presented of the influence of curing regimes on the abrasion resistance of concrete. Specimens have been produced from several different mix compositions and the abrasion resistance has been measured using a rolling-wheel apparatus. To explore these relationships, microstructural features of the cement matrix components of the surface have been studied by mercury intrusion porosimetry. The results indicate the abrasion resistance of concrete is controlled by the pore structure of the surface matrix. The nature of the curing regime having significantly influenced the pore size distribution and total pore volume of the surface matrix of the concrete surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sadegzadeh, M., Page, C.L. and Kettle, R. J.; Cement and Concrete Research 17, 581 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Sadegzadeh, M., “Abrasion Resistance of Concrete”. PhD Thesis, Aston University, Birmingham, UK, (1985).Google Scholar
3. Kettle, R. J. and Sadegzadeh, M, Am. Concr. Inst. SP100-71, 2, 1385 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Sadegzadeh, M. and Kettle, R. J., Materiaux et Construction, 21, 47 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Winslow, D. N. and Diamond, S., J. Mater. 5, 564 (1970)Google Scholar
6. Diamond, S., Cem. Concr. Res. 1, 531 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bager, D.B. and Sellevold, J., Cem. Concr. Res. 5, 171 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Alford, N.M. and Rahman, A., J. Mater. Sci. 16, 3105 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Powers, T.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 41(1), 1 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar