Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:26:41.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Pressure on 5d → 4f Emission Transitions of Ce3+

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Garry B. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4630
Yongrong Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4630
Kevin L. Bray
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4630
Ulisses R. Rodriguez Mendoza
Affiliation:
Departmento de Fisica Fundamental y Experimental, Universidad de La Laguna, S/C de Tenerife, Spain
Get access

Abstract

High pressure is used to tune the emission and band structure of the phosphors Ce3+:Lu2S3 and Ce3+:Lu2SiO5. A significant red shift of the broad 5d → 4f emission of Ce3+ was observed in both phosphors. In Ce3+:Lu2S3, we also observed a significant decrease in the emission intensity of Ce3+ and attribute the quenching to a pressure-induced electronic crossover of the Lu2S3 conduction bandedge with the emitting 5d state of Ce3+. In Ce3+:Lu2SiO5, two Ce3+ sites are present and we observed energy transfer from one site (Ce(2)) to the other (Ce(1)) at low pressure. At high pressure, the energy transfer ceases and emission is no longer observed from the Ce(1) site. We propose an exciton recombination model of the energy transfer process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yen, W. M., et al., J. Lumin. 69, 287 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Blasse, G., et al., Inorg. Chim. Acta 189, 77 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Korzhik, M. V. and Trower, W. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2327 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Bray, K. L., Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 213, p. 194 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Culp, T. D. and Bray, K. L., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 368 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Shen, Y. R. and Bray, K. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3990 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Spijker, J. C. van't, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 134, 304 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Suzuki, H., et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 320, 263 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Naud, J. D., et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 43, 1324 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Raukas, M., PhD. Thesis, University of Georgia (1997).Google Scholar
11. Takahe, K. and Taguchi, A., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 5614 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Raukas, M., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3300 (1996).Google Scholar