Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T19:55:28.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injection-Related Damage in Metal-Oxide-Silicon Tunnel Diodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

K. R. Farmer ,
P. Lundgren ,
M. O. Andersson  and
O. Engstrom
K. R. Farmer
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology, Department of Physics, Newark, NJ 07102
P. Lundgren
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Solid State Electronics, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
M. O. Andersson
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Solid State Electronics, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
O. Engstrom
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Solid State Electronics, S-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

Current-voltage and conductance-voltage characterization is used to study high bias related “positive charge” in MOS tunnel diodes fabricated on p-type substrates. This charge effect appears to be associated with interface state levels that are located both throughout the band gap, and at a well-defined energy level roughly 0.3 eV above the silicon valence band edge. The well-defined state apparently acts as a tunnelingcenter communicating with the gate electrode and the silicon valence band. In addition, the first observation of high bias related charge is reported for tunnel diodes built on n-type substrates. This charge has positive character at low bias levels, transforming to net negative charge at high gate voltages.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 284: Symposium G – Amorphous Insulating Thin Films , 1992 , 229
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. See for example, Taur, Y., IEDM Tech. Dig. (1992), to be published.Google Scholar
2. Farmer, K. R., Andersson, M. O. and Engstrom, O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 2666 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Andersson, M. O., Farmer, K. R. and Engstrom, O., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 1846 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Farmer, K. R., Andersson, M. O. and Engstrom, O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 730 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Green, M. A., Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster University, 1974.Google Scholar
6. Maserjian, J., in Physics and Chemistry ofSiO2 and the Si-SiO2 Interface, edited by Helms, C. R. and Deal, B. (Pergamon, New York, 1988), p. 427.Google Scholar
7. Nicollian, E. H. and Brews, J. R., MOS Physics and Technology (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
8. Schmidlin, F. W., J. Appl. Phys. 37, 2823 (1966).Google Scholar
9. Direct tunneling from the valence band would not be expected to be important because, for the diodes under test, the ratio of valence band to conduction band contributionsto the tunnel current, Ivt/Ict ∼ 10”−12. See reference 5, p. 206.Google Scholar
10. Kar, S. and Dahlke, W. E., Solid-State Electron. 15, 221 (1972).Google Scholar
11. Card, H. C. and Roderick, E. H., Solid-State Electron, 15, 993 (1972).Google Scholar
12. Card, H. C., Solid-State Electron. 22, 809 (1979).Google Scholar