Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:15:50.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interface Defects in GaAs and GaAs-AlxGa1−xAs Grown on Ge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

N.-H. Cho ,
S. McKernan ,
C. B. Carter  and
D. K. Wagner
N.-H. Cho
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Bard Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853
S. McKernan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Bard Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853
C. B. Carter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Bard Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853
D. K. Wagner
Affiliation:
Applied Solar Energy Corporation, 15251 E. Don Julian Road, P.O. Box 1212, City of Industry, CA. 91749
Get access

Abstract

Σ=3 lateral twin boundaries and a Σ=19 boundary have been investigated by highresolution electron microscopy. The lateral twin boundary was produced by growth on single crystal (110) Ge substrate and was observed to facet parallel to the common (112) plane and the (111)/{115} planes. The Σ=19 boundary was grown on a bicrystal substrate and faceted parallel to the common {331} plane. In this case, convergent-beam electron diffraction was used to determine the polarity of the adjoining grains. A possible model for the atomic configuration is proposed for each of the observed boundaries. GaAs-AlxGa1−xAs heterolayers were grown on a (001) Ge substrates to examine the interaction of antiphase boundaries with heterojunctions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 104 , 1987 , 617
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Holt, D.B., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 25, 1385–1395 (1964).Google Scholar
2.McPherson, J.W., Filatovs, G., Stefanakos, E. and Couis, W., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 41, 747–756 (1980).Google Scholar
3.De Cooman, B.C., Cho, N.-H., Carter, C.B. and Elgat, Z., Ultramicrosc. 18 305 (1986).Google Scholar
4.Carter, C.B., Cho, N.-H., Elgat, Z., Fletcher, R. and Wagner, D.K., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser 76 221 (1985).Google Scholar
5.Cho, N.-H., Carter, C.B., Wagner, D.K. and McKernan, S., Microsc. Semicon. Mater. Conf., Oxford, March (1987).Google Scholar
6.Cho, N.-H., Proc. 45th Annual Meeting EMSA, Baltimore (1987).Google Scholar
7.Smith, D.A. and Krakow, W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (1986).Google Scholar
8.Taftø, J., Proc. 39th Annual Meeting EMSA, San Antonio154 (1979).Google Scholar
9.Taftø, J. and Spence, J.C., J. Appl. Cryst. 15 60 (1982).Google Scholar
10.Liliental-Weber, Z. and Parechanian-Allen, L., Appl. Phys. Lett, 49(18) 1190 (1986).Google Scholar
11.De Cooman, B.C. and Carter, C.B., Appl. Phys. Lett, 50(1) 40 (1987).Google Scholar
12.Cho, N.-H., McKernan, S., Wagner, D.K. and Carter, C.B., J. Phys. in press (1987).Google Scholar
13.Cho, N.-H., De Cooman, B.C. and Carter, C.B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 47(8) 879 (1985).Google Scholar
14.Carter, C.B., Cho, N.-H., McKernan, S. and Wagner, D.K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 91, 181 (1987).Google Scholar
15.Cho, N.-H., McKernan, S., Carter, C.B., De Cooman, B.C. and Wagner, D.K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 91, 161 (1987).Google Scholar