Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:44:59.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetics of Low-Pressure Mocvd Of GaAs from Triethyl-Gallium and Arsine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

N.K. Ingle ,
C. Theodoropoulos ,
T.J. Mountziaris ,
R.M. Wexler  and
F.T.J. Smith
N.K. Ingle
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260
C. Theodoropoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260
T.J. Mountziaris
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Center for Electronic and Electro-optic Materials, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260
R.M. Wexler
Affiliation:
Eastman Kodak Company, Corporate Research Laboratories, Rochester, NY 14650
F.T.J. Smith
Affiliation:
Eastman Kodak Company, Corporate Research Laboratories, Rochester, NY 14650
Get access

Abstract

The growth of undoped GaAs films from Ga(C2H5)3 (TEG) and AsH3 by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) has been studied in a low-pressure reactor operating at 3 Torr. This precursor combination is known to produce GaAs films with very low carbon incorporation when compared to films grown from Ga(CH3)3 (TMG) and AsH3. A kinetic model of the growth process has been developed that includes both gas-phase and surface reactions based on reported decomposition mechanisms of TEG and AsH3. The kinetic model was coupled to a transport model describing flow, heat and mass transfer. Finite element simulations were performed to determine the rate constants of the growth reactions that provide the best fit between predicted and observed growth rates. Under typical operating conditions the surface reactions were found to dominate the growth process and a reduced surface kinetic model was identified by sensitivity analysis. The proposed reaction-transport models can successfully predict observed growth rates of GaAs films and they can be used for identifying optimal operating conditions in MOCVD reactors.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 334: Symposium W – Gas-Phase and Surface Chemistry in Electronic Materials Processing , 1993 , 177
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1. Smith, F.T.J., Prog. Solid St. Chem. 19, 111 (1989); F.T.J. Smith, MRS Syrup. Proc. 204, 117 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Kobayashi, N. and Makimoto, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24(10), L824 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Kuech, T.F., Mat. Sci. Rep. 2, 1 (1987); and references within.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kimura, K., Takagishi, S., Horiguchi, S., Kamon, K., Mihara, M. and Ishii, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 25(9), 1393 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Kuech, T.F. and Potemski, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47(8), 821 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Jensen, K.F., J. Crystal Growth 98, 148 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Paputa, M.C. and Price, S.J.W., Can. J. Chem. 57, 3178 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Yoshida, M., H. Watanabe and Uesugi, F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 677 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Lee, P.W., Omstead, T.R., McKenna, D.R. and Jensen, K.F., J. Crystal Growth, 85, 165 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Mountziaris, T.J. and Jensen, K.F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 2426 (1991).Google Scholar
11. McCaulley, J.A., McCrary, V.R. and Donnelly, V.M., J. Phys. Chem. 93, 1014 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Foord, J.S., Singh, N.K., Wee, A.T.S., French, C.L. and Fitzgerald, E.T., MRS Syrup. Proc. 204, 3 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Donnelly, V.M., McCaulley, J.A. and Shul, R.J., MRS Syrup. Proc. 204, 15 (1991); V.M. Donnelly and A. Robertson, Surf. Sci. 293, 93 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Yu, M.L., Memmert, U., Buchan, N.I. and Kuech, T.F., MRS Syrup. Proc. 204, 37 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Liickerath, R., Tommack, P., Hertling, A., Koss, H.J., Balk, P., Jensen, K.F. and Richter, W., J. Crystal Growth 93, 151 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Tsang, W. and Hampson, R.F., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 15(3), 1087 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Mounmiaris, T.J., Kalyanasundaram, S. and Ingle, N.K., J. Crystal Growth, 131,283 (1993).Google Scholar
18. Coltrin, M.E., Kee, R.J. and Miller, J.A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 1206 (1986).Google Scholar
19. Ingle, N.K., Theodoropoulos, C., T.J. Mountziaris, Wexler, R.M. and Smith, F.T.J., manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar