Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:30:52.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Laser-Mössbauer Method for Surface Evolution and Thin Film Microstructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Monica Sorescu*
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Physics Department, Bayer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15282-0321, USA
Get access

Abstract

Using amorphous Fe81B13.5Si3.5C2, Fe40Ni38Mo4B18, Fe66Co18B15Si1 and Fe72.6Cr22Al4.8Si0.3Y0.3 as model systems, we apply the laser-Mössbauer method in order to obtain metallic glasses with novel properties. As shown by transmission Mössbauer spectroscopy, the bulk magnetic texture was modified in a rational manner by applying a varying number of excimer laser pulses per spot (λ=248 nm, τ=8 ns). As shown by conversion electron Mössbauer spectroscopy, this process left the surface magnetic texture unchanged and induced a distribution of magnetic moment directions throughout the thickness of the foil. A similar dependence of the magnetic texture upon the number of applied laser pulses was obtained in metallic glasses irradiated with a Nd:YAG laser (λ=532 nm, τ=8 ns). However, in this case we observed the onset of surface crystallization in the hyperfine magnetic field distributions extracted from the CEMS spectra. When a pulsed alexandrite laser was used (λ=750 nm, τ=60 μs), the onset of crystallization was found to be accompanied by bulk oxidation and the formation of magnetite particles in the irradiated system. Finally, a crucial experiment was performed in order to demonstrate the role played by the magnetostriction constant in the onset of crystallization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Sorescu, M., Tsakalakos, L. and Sands, T., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 6652 (1999).Google Scholar
[2]Sorescu, M. and Knobbe, E. T., Phys. Rev. B 49, 3253 (1994).Google Scholar
[3]Sorescu, M., Knobbe, E. T. and Barb, D., Phys. Rev. B 51, 840 (1995).Google Scholar
[4]Sorescu, M. and Knobbe, E. T., Phys. Rev. B 52, 16086 (1995).Google Scholar
[5]Slawska-Waniewska, A., Siemko, A, Finck-Finowicki, J., Zaluski, L. and Lachowicz, H. K., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 101, 40 (1991).Google Scholar
[6]Gonzalez, J. and Blanco, J. M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 126, 151 (1990).Google Scholar
[7]Matteazzi, P., Lanotte, L. and Tagliaferri, V., Hyperfine Interact. 45, 315 (1989).Google Scholar
[8]Radlinski, A. P., Calka, A., and Luther-Davis, B., Mater. Sci.Eng. 97, 253 (1988).Google Scholar
[9]Aroca, C., Sanchez, M. C., Tanarro, I., Sanchez, P., Lopez, E. and Vazquez, M., Phys. Rev. B 42, 8086 (1990).Google Scholar
[10]Schaaf, P., Kramer, A., Blaes, L., Wagner, G., Aubertin, F. and Gonser, U., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 53, 184 (1991).Google Scholar
[11]Sorescu, D., Sorescu, M., Mihailescu, I. N., Barb, D. and Hening, A., Solid State Commun. 85, 717 (1993).Google Scholar
[12]Brand, R. A., Lauer, J. and Herlach, D. M., J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 13, 675 (1983).Google Scholar
[13]Sorescu, M., J. Alloys & Comp. 284, 232 (1999).Google Scholar
[14]Sorescu, M. and Schafer, S. A., Scripta Mater. 36, 1255 (1997).Google Scholar
[15]Sorescu, M., J. Alloys & Comp. 280, 251 (1998).Google Scholar