Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:29:36.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaching of Spent Fuel under Anaerobic and Reducing Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Yngve Albinsson ,
Arvid Ödegaard-Jensen ,
Virginia M. Oversby  and
Lars O. Werme
Yngve Albinsson
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
Arvid Ödegaard-Jensen
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
Virginia M. Oversby
Affiliation:
VMO Konsult, Karlavägen 70, SE-114 59 Stockholm, Sweden
Lars O. Werme
Affiliation:
Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, Box 5864, SE-10240 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Sweden plans to dispose of spent nuclear fuel in a deep geologic repository in granitic rock. The disposal conditions allow water to contact the canisters by diffusion through the surrounding bentonite clay layer. Corrosion of the canister iron insert will consume oxygen and provide actively reducing conditions in the fluid phase. Experiments with spent fuel have been done to determine the dissolution behavior of the fuel matrix and associated fission products and actinides under conditions ranging from inert atmosphere to reducing conditions in solutions. Data for U, Pu, Np, Cs, Sr, Tc, Mo, and Ru have been obtained for dissolution in a dilute NaHCO3 groundwater for 3 conditions: Ar atmosphere, H2 atmosphere, and H2 atmosphere with Fe(II) in solution. Solution concentrations forU, Pu, and Mo are all significantly lower for the conditions that include Fe(II) ions in the solutions together with H2 atmosphere, while concentrations of the other elements seem to be unaffected by the change of atmospheres or presence of Fe(II). Most of the material that initially dissolved from the fuel has reprecipitated back onto the fuel surface. Very little material was recovered from rinsing and acid stripping of the reaction vessels.

Type
articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 757: Symposium II – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI , 2002 , II9.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Spahiu, K., Eklund, U-B., Cui, D., and Lundström, M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV, edited by McGrail, B.P. and Cragnolino, G.A (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 713, Warrendale, PA, 2002) pp. 633–638.Google Scholar
2. Ollila, K., Solubility of Unirradiated UO2 Fuel in Aqueous Solutions – Comparison Between Experimental and Calculated (EQ3/6) Data. Report YJT-95–14 (Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Helsinki, Finland, 1995) 27 p.Google Scholar
3. Grambow, B., Loida, A., Dressler, P., Geckeis, H., Gago, J., Casas, I., de Pablo, J., Giménez, J., Terrero, M.E., Long-term Safety of Radioactive Waste Disposal: Chemical Reaction of Fabricated and High Burnup Spent UO2 Fuel with Saline Brines. Final Report. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technical Report FZKA 5702 (Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1996) 174 p.Google Scholar
4. Grambow, B., Loida, A., Martinez-Esparza, A., Diaz-Arocas, P., de Pablo, J., Paul, J.L., Marx, G., Glatz, J.P., Lemmens, K., Ollila, K., Christensen, H., Long-term Safety of Radioactive Waste Disposal: Source Term for Performance Assessment of Spent Fuel as a Waste Form. Final Report. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Technical Report FZKA 6420 (Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2000) 383 p.Google Scholar
5. Bruno, J., Cera, E., Grivé, M., Eklund, U.-B., and Eriksen, T., Experimental determination and chemical modelling of radiolytic processes at the spent fuel/water interface. SKB Technical Report TR-99–26 (SKB, Stockholm, 1999) 51 p.Google Scholar
6. Albinsson, Y., Jakobsson, A.-M and Ödegard-Jensen, A., Rates and Mechanisms of Radioactive Release and Retention inside a Waste Disposal Canister, European Commission Contract N° FIKW-CT-2000–00019, 2nd Annual Progress Report, August 2002.Google Scholar
7. Rai, D., Felmy, A.R. and Ryan, J.L., Inorg. Chem. 29, 260 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Lemire, R.J. and Garisto, F., The solubility of U, Np, Pu, Th, and Tc in Geologic Disposal Vault for Used Nuclear Fuel. AECL Report AECL-10009 (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Canada, 1989)Google Scholar
9. Albinsson, Y., Forsyth, R., Skarnemark, G., Skålberg, M., Torstenfelt, B., and Werme, L., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 559–565.Google Scholar
10. Ramebäck, H., Albinsson, Y., Skålberg, M., and Werme, L., Radiochimica Acta 66/67, 405 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Beall, G.W. and Allard, B., in Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions, edited by Tewari, P.H., (Plenum Press, New York, 1981) p. 193.Google Scholar
12. Ramebäck, H., Albinsson, Y., Skålberg, M., Sätmark, B. and Liljenzin, J.O., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A357, 540 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Kleycamp, H., J. Nucl. Mater. 131, 221 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Grenthe, I., Fuger, J., Konigs, J. M., Muller, A.B., Nguyen-Trung, C., and Warner, H., Chemical Thermodynamcs of Uranium (North-Holland, Netherlands, 1992).Google Scholar