Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:31:36.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Deep Impurity InxGa1-xP Grown by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Z. C. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
Bing Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
H. K. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
J. C. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
Get access

Abstract

InxGai-xP (x=0.49) layers lattice-matched to GaAs have been grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). We did not observe any deep levels in the temperature range of 30-380K by deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) in undoped In0.49Ga0.51P layers which have a background concentration of 3.1×1015 cm−3. The deep levels, if they exist, have a concentration of less than 5×1011 cm−3, which is the lowest deep level concentration found so far in InxGa1-xP materials. Moreover, lattice-mismatched InxGa1-xP/GaAs heterojunctions were deliberately grown by varying the In-composition ranging from 0.43 to 0.57. No deep levels were created in 1-μm-thick InxGa1-xP layers due to lattice mismatch when 0.469 < x < 0.532. However, we have observed a shallow electron trap at EC - 60 meV in InxGa1-xP layers with x < 469, and a deep electron trap located at Ec - 0.85 eV in the samples with x > 0.532. We suggest that the lattice-mismatch-induced-defects in InxGa1-xP are either electrically inactive or resided outside the bandgap when In content ranging from 0.469 to 0.532.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ishikawa, M., Ohba, Y., Sugawara, H., Yamamoto, M. and Nakanishi, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 48, 207 (1986)Google Scholar
2. Stinson, L.J., Yu, J.G., Lester, S.D., Peanasky, M.J. and Park, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 2012 (1991)Google Scholar
3. Kroemer, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 1, 126 (1983)Google Scholar
4. Paloura, E.C., Ginoudi, A., Kiriakidis, G., Frangis, N., Scholz, F., Moser, M., Christou, A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 60, 2749 (1992)Google Scholar
5. Feng, S.L., Bourgoin, J.C., Omnes, F. and Razeghi, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 59, 941 (1991)Google Scholar
6. Huang, Z.C. and Wie, C.R., J. Appl. Phys., 75, 989 (1994)Google Scholar
7. Huang, Z.C., Wie, C.R., Varriano, J.A., Koch, M.W. and Wicks, G.W., J. Appl. Phys., 77, 1587 (1995)Google Scholar
8. Look, D.C., He, Y., Ramdani, J., El-Masry, N. and Bedair, S.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63, 1231 (1993)Google Scholar
9. Lan, S., Yang, C.Q., Cui, D.L., Xu, W.J. and Liu, H.D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 66, 872 (1995)Google Scholar
10. Huang, Z.C., Wie, C.R., Johnstone, D., Stutz, C.E. and Evans, K.R., J. Appl. Phys., 73, 4362 (1993)Google Scholar
11. Krishnamoorthy, V., Ribas, P. and Park, R.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 2000 (1991)Google Scholar
12. Schaff, W.J. and Eastman, L.F., E-MRS Meeting, June 1989, Vol. XVI, p.295 Google Scholar
13. Zhu, Q.S. and Akasaki, I., Semicond. Sci. and Teclinol., Vol. 7, 1441 (1992)Google Scholar