Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T11:18:12.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Martensite Lattice Correspondence and Twinning in Uranium Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J.G. Speer  and
D.V. Edmonds
J.G. Speer
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH England
D.V. Edmonds
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH England
Get access

Abstract

A new lattice correspondence has been deduced for the γ→a′ martensite reaction in dilute uranium alloys. The new correspondence involves a lattice deformation with significantly smaller principal strains than those previously considered, although more atomic shuffles are required.

From an analysis of possible transformation twinning modes based on the new correspondence, the further possibility of a deformation twinning mode in these alloys is theoretically predicted. The mode is compound, described by (021)(023) [012] [032], and involves a twinning shear (g = .044) which is smaller than any value previously predicted or observed, although again a larger number of shuffles would be required. The significance of these results is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 21: Symposium GREECE – Phase Transformations in Solids , 1983 , 705
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cahn, R.W., Acta Met., 1, 49 (1953).Google Scholar
2. Crocker, A.G., J.Nucl.Mat., 16, 306 (1965).Google Scholar
3. Lloyd, L.J. and Chiswick, H.H., Trans.AIME, 203, 1206 (1955).Google Scholar
4. Lomer, W.M, The Mechanism of Phase Transformations in Metals, London (Inst. of Metals), 243 (1956).Google Scholar
5. Crocker, A.G. and Ross, N.D.H., The Mechanism of Phase 69). Transformations in Crystalline Solids, London (Inst. of Metals), 176 (1969).Google Scholar
6. Christian, J.W., Atomic Energy Research Estab. Report (AERE M/R 1811), (1955).Google Scholar
7. May, G.H., International Research and Development Co. Research Report (IRD 66–71), (1966).Google Scholar
8. Carpenter, D.A. and Vandermeer, R.A., ICOMAT-82, Leuven (1982), to be published.Google Scholar
9. Hatt, B.A., J.Nucl.Mat., 19, 133 (1966).Google Scholar
10. Giraud-Héraud, F., Guillaumin, J. and Sifferlen, R., J.Nucl.Mat., 25, 16 (1968).Google Scholar
11. Christian, J.W., The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, London (Pergamon Press), (1965).Google Scholar
12. Otsuka, K. and Shimizu, K., Int. Summer Course on Martensitic Transformations, Leuven, 1982, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
13. Yakel, H.L., Physical Metallurgy of Uranium Alloys, Burke, J.J. et al, eds., Chestnut Hill, Mass., (Brook Hill Publ. Co), 259 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Howlett, B.W., J.Nucl.Mat., 35, 278 (1970).Google Scholar
15. Yakel, H.L., J.Nucl.Mat., 33, 286 (1969).Google Scholar
16. Jaswon, M.A. and Dove, D.B., Acta Cryst., 10, 14 (1957).Google Scholar
17. Ross, N.D.H. and Crocker, A.G., Scripta Met., 3, 37 (1969).Google Scholar